child language development a02 Flashcards

1
Q

what are the five stages of spoken language development

A
pre-verbal
holophrastic 
two word stage 
telegraphic stage
post telegraphic stage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

] Pre-verbal stage: cooing

A

Cooing begins from about 2 months old. The baby experiments with the noises that can be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pre-verbal stage:babbling

A

Variegated babbling emerges slightly later and involves variation in the consonant and vowel sound being produced. E.g. daba, manamoo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Holophrastic stage

A

The holophrastic stage is when the child produces their first word that they used to convey meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What consonants develop first

A

Plosives generally like /b/ /p/ /d/ while they develop fricatives later. Becauseof ease of articulation.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by communicative competence?​

A

When a child reaches a stage when they can fully comprehend and uselanguage, including an awareness of context.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Diminutives

A

Blankie for blanket
Or
Doggie for dog

Reason for use: ease of articulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Phonological Features in CLD:

Substitution

A

The process of swapping onesound for another (that is easierto pronounce)
fink

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Phonological Features in CLD: assimilation

A

Saying the same sound in place of twodifferent sounds in the same word –assimilation.
goggie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deletion (final consonant or weak syllable)

A

Omitting a phoneme in word

flyin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consonant cluster reductions

A

Reducing phonologically more complex unitsinto simple ones – from two or moreconsonants down to one.
Spoon –>poon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Two-word stage

A

At around 18months a child will start to put two words together to articulate something to their caregivers
At this stage they begin to understand the rules of grammar as they use 2 words and begin to see the relationship between them.
This stage is also described as the vocabulary spurt or naming explosion phase. After a child has learnt about 50 and 100 words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Telegraphic stage

A

At around 2, a child will move from just producing two words together to producing longer and ‘more complete’ utterances.

As a result of this, children at this stage will include content words and omit grammatical words. They may say things like this:

‘me going on trip’ as opposed to ‘I am going on a trip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

‘me going on trip’?​

A

Demonstrates awareness of syntax – word order is accurate (SVO)

However, the child hasused the object pronoun‘me’ as thesubject asopposed to‘I’​ which is the subject pronoun.

Grammatical function words omitted:
the auxiliary verb ‘am’ and indefinitearticle ‘a’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

] Post telegraphic stage

A

By the age of 3, a child’s speech will become more like adult speech.
Grammatical words will begin to emerge; longer sentences with both content words and grammatical words.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Behaviourism: Skinner

A

Children learn through positive and negative reinforcement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

positive reinforcement

A

When a caregiver reinforces language either by encouraging the child through praise when they say something ‘correct’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

negative reinforcements

A

Discouraging a child to use ‘incorrect’ version by gesturing no, repeating what they say but correcting it or simply telling them that it is incorrect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Behaviourism: limitations

A

A huge part of learning language is the learning the rule of grammar.
In this process children apply or over apply rules and create unsuccessful utterances
These cannot have been acquired through negative or positive reinforcement.
Children are often unable to repeat what an adult says.
Parents are more concerned about the truth value of their child’s speech as opposed to the grammar –
skinner tested on rats
Roger brown u bend theory virteous errors are needed to learn that their are exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Behaviourism: how to apply to data

A

Look for where the caregiver positively or negatively reinforces language
Parent corrects or praises the child
‘Well done’
Affirmative response ‘yes that’s right’
Negation ‘no that is not the right thing to do’
Child imitates (repeats what the parent is saying) without understanding

21
Q

Nativism: Chomsky Nativism: Chomsky

A

Belief that there is an innate, in-built language learning device that have from birth that enables us to learn how to speak and use language.

22
Q

poverty of stimulus

A

Caregivers do not provide a good source of English and therefore this lead to a poverty of stimulus.

23
Q

Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

A

His main theory is that children have a Language Acquisition Device (LAD) in their brains which enables them to develop and acquire language. It contains a set of rules about to use grammar. When children become more expose to language, this activates parts of their LAD.

24
Q

Universal Grammar.

A

The rules of grammar coded in the LAD, he calls Universal Grammar.

25
Q

virtuous errors

A

He explains that children make mistakes with language that they will never have hear from their parents i.e. ‘I threwed the ball’ therefore they could have picked this up learnt this through imitation.
He calls these virtuous errors – as it is understandable why they have been used. Grammatical rules have been extended and used on irregular verbs.

26
Q

Nativism: Pinker

A

Proposed that when a child produces an utterance, almost every single time the utterance is new.
Therefore, it could not have been acquired through imitation.

27
Q

Nativism: Pye

A

Cultures around the world vary and raise children differently.
Some don’t use CDS (Child directed speech) yet they all learn to speak.
This shows that there must be something innate about process of acquiring language.

28
Q

Nativism: Berko-Gleason and The Wug Test

A

The experiment was used to test whether children memorise words and their endings or whether they extract the rules they know about word endings (inflections) to other words.

75% of children aged 4-5 were able to choose the right ending.
This supported the view that children did not learn through imitation as the word was made up. But rather they had an innate system of grammatical rules.

29
Q

Nativism: The Genie case study

A

Genie was a child who was severely neglected and abused until the age of 13
She had no exposure or contact with humans. She had been deprived of this.
Linguists worked with her to help her learn language.
But because she passed the critical period, she couldn’t learn language like children normally do – particularly in terms of grammar.
This supported the nativist view that language cannot be acquired through imitation and that their must be an internal structure.

30
Q

Nativism: Limitations

A

There is no scientic proof for Chomsky’s theory
He based his theory solely on his observations.
Hedid not study real children. The theory relies on children being exposed to language but takes no account of the interaction between children and their carers. Nor does it recognise the reasons why a child might want to speak, the functions of language.

However, Pinkerhas developedChomsky’s original theory and it isreceivedwell in the academic world.

31
Q

Nativism: How to apply to data

A

Children resisting being corrected OR children which accept correction and then revert back again.
Mistakes with inflections.
Children making virtuous errors.
Correct application of syntax.

32
Q

Social Interactionism Theory: Bruner

A

Language exists for the purpose of communication and can only be learned in the context of interaction with people who want to communicate with you.
Children are born with nothing and learn language from the social environment they are in – this includes caregivers providing support.

33
Q

Language Acquisition Support System (LASS)

A

Bruner developed the concept of the Language Acquisition Support System (LASS) which is designed for caregivers to scaffold and support a child’s language to help them get it correct. When using language to talk to a child, this is called ‘Child Directed Speech (CDS)’

34
Q

CDS includes

A

CDS includes: labelling, over-articulation, echoing, expansion , expiation, and reformulation.

35
Q

Interactionalism: Bruner

labelling

A

Labelling – caregivers providing a label ‘this is a ball’ that is a net’

36
Q

Over-articulation bruner

Echoing

A

Over-articulation – elongation vowel sounds – baby’s fooood

– repeating what the child is saying

37
Q

expansion bruner

A

Expansion – repeating what a child is saying but in a more linguistically specialised way. Taking basic utterances and making them more specialised: child: doggy chew -> caregiver: yes, that’s right, the dog is chewing.

38
Q

Expatiation bruner

A

repeating what the child said but adding more information for example – child: bottle cold -> caregiver: yes, the bottle is cold so I will warm it up.

39
Q

Reformulation bruner

A

repeating what the child says, but in a different way, for example: child: doggy tail wag -> caregiver: is the dog wagging his tail

40
Q

Snow interactionalists

A

Coined the term ‘motherese’ to describe how mothers talk to their children. This includes:
Higher pitch, greater range of intonation, frequent use of interrogative and declarative sentences, repetition of syllables and phrases

41
Q

Bard and Sachs

inter

A

Case study of Jim a boy with 2 deaf parents. They exposed him to TV and radio to hear language but he didn’t learn how to speak. With interactions with speech therapist he was able to acquire language.

42
Q

Trevarthen

A

studied the interaction between parents and
babies who were too young to speak. He concluded that the turn-taking structure of conversation is
developed through games and non-verbal communication long before actual words are uttered.

43
Q

Cognitivism: Piaget

A

Children need to be cognitively adept to talk about things; they cannot express what they do not understand.

44
Q

object permanence

A

Piaget argues that until children learn the role of object permanence (things still exist when you can’t see them) – they struggle to name things; hence why children properly acquire language at around 1 year.

45
Q

Cognitivism: Vygotsky

A

Children have a cognitive deficiency – they need to understand things and have a gap of knowledge. He calls this the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).

46
Q

ZPD

A

describes the area between what a child can already do and that which is beyond their reach. It is the area into which a caregiver might enable the child to progress by offering the necessary support or scaffolding to facilitate learning.

47
Q

More Knowledgeable Other (MKO)

A

He argues that the role of the caregiver (or, as he describes, a More Knowledgeable Other (MKO) is to fill the cognitive gap.

48
Q

Cognitivism: limitations

A

Children who have learning difficulties still manage to acquire language

49
Q

Cognitivism and what to look for in data

A

Children who are struggling to say something they are unlikely to understand
Caregivers explaining something to children