Children's Services Final Flashcards
(80 cards)
Analogue studies-
Allows researchers to examine issues that cannot be addressed in field studies. Shows that memory is multiply determined, depending, for example, on characteristics of the child and the setting in which memory retrieval occurs. They use mundane experience (playing games), fictitious experiences (events that were never experienced), or naturally occurring stressful experiences (medical procedures) to determine the accuracy child reports and how to best interview the child. A child’s suggestibility and tendency to make false reports can be examined scientifically.
Cognitive interview
Can be used with adults and older children to obtain extensive and accurate reports. Based on basic principles of memory cognition, and communication. They are given specific directions on how to facilitate the recall of details, conversations, and names.
Requirements:
1. Reconstructs mentally the personal and environmental context at the time of the crucial event.
2. Report everything
3. Recount the event in a variety of orders and from a variety of perspectives.
Structured interview process-
They differ from ordinary conversations. They have definite purpose, question-answer format, and a well-fined goal
Unstructured interview
Interviewers follow the child’s lead. (ill-advised)
Structured (NICHD)-
Exact wording of questions is scripted.
Semi-structured (finding words)
Interviewers follow questioning guidelines and cover pre-determined topics, selecting from a tool kit of strategies
Flexible (NCAC)
Middle ground between structured and semi-structured
Interview protocols-
Most use a phase/stage approach. The most extensively studied forensic interview protocol with NICHD developed by Michael Lamb. Examined the quality of children’s memory reports in relation to such factors as age, rapport building, open-ended questioning, use of drawings, and numerous other factors. Practice answering question questions yields greater amounts of information in filed studies and greater accuracy in recall.
Initial Preparatory Phase
1. Introduction
2. Rapport development
3. Promise to tell the truth, narrative practice, instructions
Getting Information
1. Invitation fro free recalls e.g. what happened?
Closure
1. Re-composure if the child is upset
2. Time for the child to ask questions.
Interview settings
Age appropriate, private and child friendly setting with minimal distraction.Private interview are recommended because studies have shown that children are more reluctant to accuse adults of wrongdoing if the adult or a peer are present. Therefore do not assume that a parent’s presence will decrease the child’s stress. There may be times when a child’s protest cannot be reassured and a support person may be assigned to them for a short period of time.
Interviewer styles-
They should strive to remain objective and neutral. The interviewers should explore alternative hypothesis and keep bias in check. They will be more successful if they provide a supportive but non-suggestive atmosphere. Provide social support through eye contact, relaxed body, smiling, and being warm. It has shown to help children be more resistant to misleading questions and to improve interviewing performance without contaminating their accounts of nun-abusive events. However it is critical that supportiveness not become selective reinforcement.
Multiple interviews-
Excessive interviewing of young children using suggestive techniques can be detrimental to the accuracy of their reports. However, repeated non leading questions tend to uncover new details. Researchers have not found a detrimental effect of repeating open-ended questions of WH-(who what, where, why , when) questions. However, repetition of yes/no questions can be problematic.
Age factors
Young children are more likely to sway to suggestive pressures than older children. They are more inclined to assume that adults are knowledgeable and do not want to disappoint them, which increases their vulnerability to suggestion.
Interview questions
Two ways to think about questions:
1. Format/form
2. Content-What do you really want to know?
Phrasing Questions:
1. Phrase in the language and vocabulary of the child.
2. Do not overload or use long questions
3. Simplify language
4. Avoid concepts that are difficult for age (time/number)
Continuum of questions
- Narrative Invitation- “tell me everything that happened”.
- Focus narrative request- “Tell me about your father?”
- Recall memory- most reliable and credible. Non-leading. Child supplies details
- Detail Question- “Who was home that night”
- Multiple question choice- “where you in the bathroom or a bedroom”
- Yes/no question- “do you know the person who touched you”. Can be bias
- Leading question- “did you father touch you”
- Recognition memory- last preferred.
Juvenile Delinquents:
Illegal conduct by a minor that would be a crime if committed by an adult.
Status offenders
Conduct that is not a crime if committed by a adult. It is a crime by virtue of being a minor. (Running away, truancy, drinking)The courts have authority over ungovernable children who refuse to obey the reasonable demands of their parents
Abused and neglected children court cases
Courts have author to intervene in the family to protect children from abuse and neglect. However they must be aware of their duty to protect all parties under the law. They work in partnership with CPS, and in most cases CPS workers decide not include the juvenile court and CPS decides to offer services.
Burden of proof
- Beyond reasonable doubt- Most difficult to meet (%95)-
IWCA requires this level of proof to terminate parental rights. - Clear and conniving (%75)-To sever parental rights CPS must prove parental unfitness by clear and convincing evidence.
- Preponderance-least demanding and easiest to meet (%51)-CPS has the burden of proof in cases and must prove maltreatment by a preponderance of proof
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
(1974)-Law requires states receiving federal funds to stop institutionalizing status offenders in facilities for juvenile delinquents.
Investigation Worker:
Investigates reports of abuse/neglect and decides whether or not the report should be substantiated. He or she will make a recommendation about the removing of a child from the home and write an affidavit explaining the circumstances of the case.
Permanency Planning Worker
Works with the family to develop a treatment plan, which lists the steps that must be taken for the child to return home. Visits the child and family regularly and monitors progress on the treatment plan. Reposts on their progress to the judge.
Guardian ad Litem
The court appoints a GAL to every child under the age of 14. The GAL’s job is to represent the child interest of the child. If the child is 14 or older the court will appoint a Youth Attorney.
Parents Attorney
Parents involved in abuse/neglect case are named as respondents. Respondents have a right to an attorney and if they cannot afford one, an attorney will be appointed by the court. The respondent attorney is required to meet with the parents, help them understand their rights, and represent their wishes in court.
Court appointed special Advocate (CASA):
A trained volunteer who meets with the child and others involved in the case. The CASA prepares a report to the court about how the child is doing and makes recommendations about what is believed to be in the child’s best interest.