Choice of Law Flashcards
(42 cards)
When does a choice of law issue arise?
When:
- The lawsuit involves factual connections with multiple states, and
- The multiple states will have different laws leading to different results.
What is the core question when analyzing a choice of law problem?
Which states law will govern?
What is the general answer to the core question?
The governing law is the law selected by the forum court according to its choice of law approach.
What is the exception the general answer to the core question?
Case is in federal court based on diversity citizenship. There are two options:
- Filed in Court: Federal Court will apply choice of law approach of the state in which it sits.
- Transferred to Court:(a) If original venue was proper –> transferors choice of law(b) if original venue was not proper –> Law of transferee court.
What is the constitutional limitation on Choice of Law?
If a state’s law is chosen and it has no significant contact with and/or legitimate interest in the litigation.
What are statutory limitations on CHoice of Law?
If the forum state has a statute for choice of law, the forum court should apply the statute.
What are the three statutory approaches for choice of law?
- Vested rights approach (First Restatement)
- The most significant relationship approach (Second Restatement), and
- The interest analysis.
What is the analysis for the Vested Rights Approach?
- Characterize the area of substantive law,
- Determine the particular choice of law rule, and
- localizing the rule to be applied.
What is the Most Significant Relationship Approach?
The courts will seek to identify the state having the most significant relationship with respect to the issue at hand and then apply that state’s law on the issue.
- Consider the connecting facts, and
- whether the policy-oriented principles should be considered.
What is the interest analysis (governmental interest)
Step 1: Assume the forum state applies it own law
Step 2: Forum state will consider whether it has any interest in the litigation.
Step 3: If NO, then Forum state applies the other states law. (False Conflict)
The true problem arises when there is a “true conflict.”
What is a true conflict?
When both the forum state and the second state have interests.
What is the opening statement for analyzing a choice of law question?
The issue presented is which state’s law will govern the outcome of this litigation. The governing law will be selected by the forum court using the (fill in the applicable choice of law approach).
What is your rule statement for vested rights?
Under the Vested Rights approach, the court will apply the law of that state mandated by the applicable vesting rule. That rule is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law.
What is the structure of your analysis for vested rights?
Sentence 1: categorize the substantive area of law
Sentence 2: state the applicable vesting rule
Sentence 3: Apply the vesting rule to determine the governing law.
Sentence 4: Apply the governing law to determine the result.
What is your rule statement for the Interest Analysis?
Under the Interest analysis, the court will consider which states have legitimate interests in the outcome of the litigation. The forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest. If the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state.
What is the structure of your analysis for Interested Analysis?
Step 1: Which states have a legitimate interest?
Step 2: Characterize the type of conflict (False conflict where only one state has an interest. True Conflict when TWO or MORE have a legitimate interest).
Step 3: Choose the governing law based on the type of conflict.
If False Conflict –> law of the interested state
If True Conflict –> If forum state is interested, apply forum state (because we assume they will in the beginning).
Step 4: Apply the governing law to determine the result.
What is the rule statement for Most Significant Relationship?
The “most significant relationship” approach seeks to identify the state with the most significant relationship to the issue at hand and apply that law. The court will consider connecting facts and relevant policy principles
What is the structure for analyzing most significant relationship test?
Step 1: Discuss the connecting facts
Step 2: Discuss policy principles
Step 3: choose the governing law based on most significant relationship
Step 4: Apply the governing law to determine result.
How does the Vesting Rule apply to Torts?
Governing law is where the injury occurred.
How does the most significant relationship approach apply to torts?
Factual Connection should consider:
- Place of injury
- Place of the conduct causing injury
- Where the parties are at home (where domiciled, residence, etc), and
- Where the relationship, if any, is centered.
Policy Principles:
- The relevant policies of the forum state, and
- the relevant policies of other connected states
NOTE: for a business, you may need to discuss where they are domiciled (incorporated) but also their place of business.
What is the usual outcome for choice of law in torts, and what is the exception?
Generally, the law of the place where the injury occurred will apply.
Except when there is
- A loss of distribution (limitations on loss, vicarious liability rules, and rules eliminating liability like immunity rules, and
- the parties share a common domicile.
Example: P and D were injured in State A, but are both residents of State B. State A limits the recovery… policy of State B will overtake.
What is your go-to statement in discussing distribution of losses?
this case involves (or the policy considerations favor x state because) the distribution of losses and both parties share a common domicile. Therefore….
Choice of Law Provision
A contractual provision selecting the law that will apply to their contract, which will be enforced if it is valid and express.
What is the impact of a choice of law provision?
If enforced –> choice of law provision displaces the courts analysis.
If NOT enforced –> court should go through the analysis.
When in doubt, find the provision invalid.