Chp 14 - Love and Hate Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Ethological and Evolutionary Perspective on Love and Hate (4)

A

1) Intra-species Aggression

  • Competition for same resources
  • Sexual jealousy, same-sex rivals

2) Dominance Hierarchy

  • aggression when changes to hierarchy
  • decreases aggression
  • set access to resources

Most violent crime, including lethal violence, is in the context of competition for material goods, status, or related to “face” or sexual jealousy (Daly & Wilson)

Overall access to resources, average wealth, median income are poor predictors

3) Wealth Disparity

  • Ratio of highest income to lowest income
  • Correlation of income inequality & murder r= +.845 (huge correlation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wealth disparity/ inequality: correlation to: (3)

A
  • Rate of imprisonment
  • Social problems
  • Homicide rate

Some have easier access to resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour (3)

A

Prefrontal cortex
Amygdala
Septum: Rage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prefrontal cortex (The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour) (5)

A
  • inhibitory control over behaviour
  • ↓ activity ↑ impulsive aggression
  • Most sensitive to alcohol (prefrontal and cerebellum)
  • not fully mature until early 20s

Compare inmates with violent vs. Non-violent crimes

  • Non-violent: had more activity in both lateral and medial prefrontal cortex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Amygdala (The Brain and Aggressive Behaviour) past case

A

Violet behaviours

Charles Whitman 1996

  • Murdered his wife, mother (knife)
  • Shot 14. Wound 31 from an observation deck, uni of texas

In diary wrote about headaches

  • Had a tumour that was exerting pressure on amygdala
  • Correlational data
  • Dysfunctional amygdala: May send dangerous signals despite none
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Family Influences: Parenting Style (4)

A

Authoritative Parents
Authoritarian Parents
Rejecting/Neglectful Parents
Permissive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Authoritative Parents (3)

A
  • Clear, enforced rules
  • Caring, supportive, high expectations
    = high self-esteem, high achievement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Authoritarian Parents (4)

A
  • Strict discipline
  • Cold, unresponsive
    = Low self-esteem, poor performance, low self-control
  • Lead to more impulsivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rejecting/Neglectful Parents (3)

A
  • No discipline, no guidance
  • Cold, unresponsive
    = Low achievement, withdrawal, poor social relationships, aggression, risky behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Permissive (3)

A
  • No guidance, discipline
  • Warm, caring
    = immature, self-centred, impulsive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Humanistic View on negative emotions (2)

A

Negative emotions stem from lack of positive regard, especially during childhood

Incongruence

  • The match between our ideal self vs. Real self
  • If match, can accept ourselves
  • In turn accept others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Prejudice (3)

A

Negative attitudes

  • Towards others because of their membership in a group, out-group
  • Based on inaccurate, or fictitious information
  • Like all long-held attitudes, resistant to change

Incomplete or fictitious information
Resistant to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Origins of Prejudice (4)

A

Social Learning

  • Conditioning, observational learning
  • e.g. growing up in families with certain prejudice, modelled

Social Comparison, Social Categorization

  • We divide the world into us and them (Social identity)
  • In group/ out group
  • Tendency to see own group as superior (ego-protection)

Social Cognition

  • From the way we think about others, beliefs about specific social groups

Realistic Conflict Theory

  • Direct inter-group competition or conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prejudice: UCLA study

A

UCLA study:

  • Quick flash of dots, guess how many
  • Over-estimators vs. Under
  • Asked about the characteristics of the other group
  • Think own group is friendlier, and smarter, don’t want to socialize with the other group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Prejudice: Ms. Elliott and Her 3rd Grade Class

A

Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr

Community predominantly white

Therefore try grade 3 class

  • Told them student with blue eyes were better, more privileged

The next day reverse the conditions

  • Blue eyed students performed better on the day they were smarter,
  • Academic performance swapped vice versa

Work together to complete a task: rely on each other:
Helps remove prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Attachment: infant and caregiver(s) (3)

A

The strong, enduring affectional tie between
infant and caregiver(s).

Indiscriminant
Discriminant
Specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indiscriminant Attachment

A
  • Newborn
  • Positive emotional display not directed at anyone
18
Q

Discriminant Attachment

A
  • Familiar, 3 months
  • Respond/prefer to familiar faces
  • All members to the family
19
Q

Specific Attachment

A

Begins 7-8 months
Formed 12 months

20
Q

Types of Attachment (4)

A

Secure Attachment
Anxious-Resistant
Anxious-Avoidant
Anxious-Disorganized

21
Q

Secure Attachment (4)

A
  • Explore with parent as a base (make sure parent is there)
  • May or may not cry on separation
  • Reunion: easily comforted
  • About 66% show such attachment
22
Q

Secure Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (2)

A
  • Fewer behavioural problems, better social relationships
  • Can form emotional relationships with others
23
Q

Anxious-Resistant (4)

A
  • Fearful even with parent present
  • Very distressed when parent is absent
  • Reunion: rejection, anger, but also desire to be close
  • 10 – 15%
24
Q

Anxious-Resistant Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (4)

A
  • Suspicious, excessive worry about partners
  • Expect partner will leave at some point
  • Ambivalent lovers – want to get close but insecure about relationships
  • Can be easily frustrated or angered
25
Anxious-Avoidant Attachment (4)
- Few signs of attachment - Little reaction to separation or reunion - Do not seek contact but do not resist - 20%
26
Anxious-Avoidant Attachment: Future behaviour in relationships (4)
- May appear not to care about relationships - Resist being dependent on others - May feel uncomfortable with closeness - Trouble trusting
27
Anxious-Disorganized (3)
- Disorganised, Contradictory responses - May appear disoriented - 5%, esp victims of maltreatment, abuse
28
Attraction (3)
Proximity and exposure Similarity Physical attractiveness - Matching effect
29
Proximity and exposure (2)
- Proximity (nearness) best predictor of who will develop emotional relationships - People attracted to those who are familiar, who they frequently see
30
Liking: Similarity (2)
- People most often are attracted to others who are similar to themselves - Similarity of attributes, beliefs, and values most important
31
Physical Attractiveness (2)
Both men and women rate attractiveness most important for the desirability of short-term dating partners Matching effect (for long term) - Most likely to have partner whose level of physical attractiveness is similar to one's own
32
Erich Fromm Views (2)
- To alleviate loneliness, we seek contact with others - Neo-analytic and Existential
33
Types of Love (Erich Fromm)
Motherly love Brotherly love Erotic love Immature love Mature love
34
Motherly love
One-sided and unequal, mother gives love unconditionally Child learns stability and security
35
Brotherly Love
Loving all others, unites the isolated individual with others (basically love and each for others, not restricted to fam)
36
Erotic Love
Temporary intimacy with an other (argues that it is stage of dev of true love)
37
Immature Love (2)
Taking love dominates over giving love; Partners expected to surrender aspects of self to form a single entity, a shared personality
38
Mature Love
Mutual care and support, acceptance, commitment, respect, kindness, friendship, devotion Requires self-love
39
Partner Selection: Evolutionary Analysis (3)
Women Prefer: - Older (3 ½ years older) - Symmetrical face (a sign of healthy and history of good health) - Evidence of high parental investments Men Prefer: - Youth and health - Symmetrical face Averaged over all cultures studied: *Female preference: mate 3½ years older. *Real age difference: grooms 3 years older.
40
Evidence of parental investment by males increases attractiveness
In picture: show interest of caring for children Evidence of parental investment, more attractive