CI Test 1 Flashcards

(79 cards)

1
Q

Evidence Based Practice

A

includes standardized outcomes, standardized terminology, personalized care, and constantly evolving practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

International Classification of Function

A

A model of health and disability; labels health conditions based on its effects on body sxs/fxns, activities, participation, environmental factors, and personal factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Body Structures/Functions (ICF)

A

Addresses where the impairment is; includes things such as pain, limited ROM, weakness,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Activities (ICF level)

A

Actual activity effected by the impairment; could include walking, climbing stairs, bed mobility, balance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Participation (ICF level)

A

How the limited activity actually effects daily life; things such as cannot deliver mail because they can’t walk, cannot be an usher at church, cannot wash the dishes; could include mobility activities, community activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Environmental Factors (ICF)

A

things that could effect the individual’s function/limitations that are in the environment; weather, climate, roads, disability access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Personal Factors (ICF)

A

Factors within the individual that could effect an individual’s outcome in recovery; depression, motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evidence Based Practic

A

the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients; requires clinical expertise, research evidence (valid/relevant), and patient values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Steps of Evidence Based Medicine

A
  1. Determine need
  2. Create Question
  3. Search Database
  4. Triage
  5. Critical Appraisal
  6. Integration
  7. Application

(DCST CIA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Determine Need (EBM)

A

Step 1

The patient creates need for clinically important information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Create Question (EBM)

A

Second step

Information needs to be converted into an answerable question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Search Database (EBM)

A

3rd step in EBM

Search for answer to clinical question using relevant sources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Triage (EBM)

A

Fourth step in EBM

Determine best evidence source for the solution to the problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Critical Appraisal (EBM)

A

Step five

Evidence is appraised for validities and applicability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Integration (EBM)

A

Step 6

Integrate the evidence, experience and patient values to develop a plan of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Application (EBM)

A

Step 7

Evidence is applied and clinical outcomes are evaluated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do we prevent PTs from not maintaining EBP after they graduate?

A

Encourage use of standardized outcome tools, keep track of outcomes, and assess performances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Autonomy

A

The ability to make one’s own decisions and to act on them; “self-determination”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Beneficence

A

The obligation to attend to the well-being of participants;

The need to maximize benefits and minimize harm

The need to critically evaluate the risk/benefit relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Justice

A

Fairness in a study; equitable distribution of benefits and burdens

There is an equal chance of being assigned to intervention groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Control Groups in Clinical Research (maintaining ethical action)

A

The best way to determine the effect of an intervention is to compare to a control group;

To make it ethical, offer a treatment option to the control group

There might not be any treatments that have been shown to be effective, so in this case it may be justified in comparing no treatment to a new treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Nuremberg Code

A

First formalized guidelines for research; evolved from Nazi war crimes trials;

Every individual must give informed consent for participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Declaration of Helsinki

A

Independent review of research protocols by an impartial committee; research findings obtained without this review should NOT be published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Institutional Review Board

A

Reviews research protocols to ensure rights of participants are protected; must consist of at least 5 members of a diverse make up from different social, cultural, and occupational backgrounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
IRB Reviews Research Proposals Based on:
``` Scientific merit Competence of investigators Risk to participants Feasibility based on resources available Risk-benefit ratio ```
26
Full IRB Review
For experimental procedures that have never been performed; with more than minimal risk; also for vulnerable populations;
27
Expedited Review
for very minimal risk experiments that uses standardized protocols frequently used in the past; reliability studies of the common clinical examination tools fall under this Only a partial board convenes
28
Exempt REview
Surveys, interviews, as long as the information remains anonymous/ cannot be identified; Studies of existing records
29
Elements of Informed Consent
Invitation to participate; Information, consent, and authorization Elements
30
Information Elements of Informed Consent
Disclosure of information; what is going to happen during the study to the subject; What risks are there? What steps minimize these risks? What would happen in the case of harm? What are the benefits? How are they ensuring confidentiality? How long are they keeping info? Where can a participant go if they have questions? Form written in lay language
31
Consent Elements
The assurance that participation is voluntary and the subject must be able to provide consent for themselves, otherwise they need a responsible party to sign Is there compensation? The subject is free to withdraw at any time
32
Authorization Elements
Consent to use data and other materials for publication and dissemination
33
Who gets authorship in a research study?
Made Substantial contributions to conception and design OR acquisition of data OR analysis and interpretation of data AND Drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content AND Contributed to final approval of the version to be published
34
Population (N)
The larger group to which you want to generalize your findings
35
Sample (n)
A smaller, hopefully representative, subgroup from the population used to determine truths about the population
36
Process of Sampling
Define target population (clearly define the criteria for the group), identify accessible population (identify the portion of the target pop that has an equal chance of being selected), obtain sample
37
Inclusion Criteria
Characteristics that you decide must be present; primary trains of your target population that should be relevant to the research question; more of these strengthens INTERNAL validity but creates more restrictions so there is a lower EXTERNAL validity
38
Homogenous Sample
Makes generalization difficult; could be easier to study, however may be difficult to apply to a large group
39
Exclusion Criteria
Factors that would disqualify individuals from participating in your study; confounding factors that may interfere with interpretation should be considered; closely related to inclusion criteria
40
Probabilistic Sampling
Ideal scenario; uses a randomly selected sample from the accessible population
41
Non-Probabilistic Sampling
Used when it is not possible to obtain a true random sample; non-probabilistic
42
Random Selectin
Probabilistic; every individual in the accessible population has an equal chance of being included in the study; Every individual has an equal chance of having some of the characteristics in the target population Should help prevent "sampling bias"
43
Sampling Bias
Individuals either over-represent or under-represent characteristics of the population;
44
Sampling Error
Difference between sample statistics and population parameters is due to chance; Probabilistic: can estimate this error Non-probabilistic: cannot estimate sampling error
45
Simple Random Sampling
Accessible population often defined by membership, directories, or lists Each member has an equal chance of being selected Random number generator, throw dice, names in hat, etc.
46
Systematic Sampling
Systematically select individuals on an interval basis (every other, every third, etc.) Sample Interval= number in the accessible population divided by the desired number for the sample (N/n)
47
Stratified Random Sampling
Identify relevant population characteristics; partition the population into homogenous, non-overlapping strata based on characteristics; draw random or systematic samples from each strata
48
Disproportional Sampling
When stratified sampling is being used, but the strata have very different representation in the population; results in insufficient sample sizes in some groups Select random samples of adequate size from each category; must weight the scores for data analysis to correctly represent the sub strata
49
Weighting Data
Score is multiplied by the weighting factor in the analysis; makes the scores from the more highly represented individuals count for more in the analysis
50
Cluster/Multistage Sampling
Strategy to link members of the accessible population to an already established grouping; successive random sampling of a series of groups in the population Ex: if we already have geographical groupings; in large multi enter trials; during every step of reducing groups we randomly select; (regions of the US)
51
Convenience Sampling
Recruiting individuals as they become available (consecutive sampling) or ask for volunteers and wait for the phone to ring
52
Quota Sampling
Uses stratification (attempts to represent each strata in the same proportion as in the target population); recruiting stops once quota has filled
53
Purposive Sampling
Individuals are hand picked for inclusion by the research based on certain criteria; large potential for bias
54
Snowball Sampling
Stage 1: a few participants who meet criteria are tested Stage2: these participants then identify others who qualify Step 3: it continues Often used for hidden or hard to reach populations
55
Recruitment
Must not coerce (caution when using own patients), must be able to withdraw from study at any time;
56
Statistical Power
Ability to find differences between groups if they exist; small sample size generally indicates a lower power
57
Reliability
Reproducibility, consistency
58
Validity
Accuracy, correctness; are you on the mark?
59
Systematic Error
Consistent, however it always overestimates/underestimates; errors from measurement to measurement are predictable; (reliable not valid)
60
Random Error
Error due to chance; errors from measurement to measurement are unpredictable; Observed score = true ability +/- random error
61
Reliability Coefficients
Reliability is a measure of how much total variance is attributed to true differences between scores; as error increases, reliability coefficient approaches zero; as error decreases, reliability coefficient approaches 1.0 T/(T+E) ``` T= true score variance E= error variance ```
62
Test-Retest Reliability
Used to establish that an instrument/tool is capable of measuring variable consistently; used for self-report questionnaires or mechanical/digital read outs; Has limitations from one session to the next Test-Retest Intervals: far enough apart to avoid learning/carryover (testing)/memory effects; impact of fatigue; close enough to avoid genuine growth
63
Intrarater Reliability
Stability of one person's measurement across 2 or more trials; blind the tester to control for bias
64
Inter rather Reliability
Variation between two or more raters who measure the same group of people; best assessed in a single trial
65
Discrete Data
Described by whole units; (could be dichotomous- a discrete variable with only two values)
66
Nominal Measurements
Classify/label; mutually exclusive categories (male/female); numbers ONLY represent a category; have no relationship with each other (names of states, names of plants)
67
Ordinal Measurements
Designates a ranking/order, but the intervals are NOT assumed to be equal; numbers represent a rank-order; Freshman, sophomore, junior, senior Professor, affiliate, guest
68
Continuous Data
A number that theoretically can take on any value along a continuum; an indefinitely large number of fractional values
69
Interval Measurements
Designates equal intervals, order, but no true zero; intervals are equal; numbers represent a value, but not absolute quantity; Temperature, 0-10, 11-20, etc.
70
Ratio Measurements
Designates equal intervals, order, and a true 0; numbers represent a value, absolute quantity from 0 Height, weight, time, goniometry
71
Direct Variables
Concrete characteristics gathered by the Rater; focus on precision and calibration; ROM (angles), height, HgB
72
Indirect Variable
Indicators of an attribute used to represent an abstract concept; use some form of direct observation to then infer a value for the variable Force, temperature
73
Operational Definitions
Helps us define variables; should inform the reader of: | What, how, who, how often (frequency), how long (duration)
74
Confounding Variables
We need to identify and control extraneous variables so they don't become confounding variables; age, gender, socioeconomic status
75
Randomized Control Trial in PEDro
compares at least 2 interventions that are related to PT; must involve human subjects; must be randomized and published in a peer review journal
76
Systematic Review
a systematic analysis of available research (RCTs); rates each trial based on specific criteria; second highest level of evidence
77
Clinical Practice Guideline
a guideline for the best course of treatment based on research; highest level of evidence
78
Trends in Studies in PT
increased # of RCTs (last 30 years), systematic reviews (last 15 years), and clinical practice guidelines (last 10 years)
79
International Classification of Function
a model of labeling health and disability