CIA.FCT&OSFI.ORSA&Stress Flashcards
(63 cards)
FCT def
is one several stress-testing processes within an insurer’s overall risk management process.
Goal of FCT
- identify threats to the insurer’s financial condition.
- take corrective actions to address those threats. (It should be performed at least once during each financial year.)
How often should AA investigate insurer’s financial position / condition
AA should make an investigation at least once each year of insurer’s financial position & financial condition, as revealed by FCT for selected scenarios.
AA report regarding to FCT findings
AA should write report to board of directors or appropriate committee of the board.
Report should identify possible actions & reasons dealing with any threats to satisfactory financial condition; comment on consistency of the results & possible actions with ORSA
Goal of ORSA
enhance an insurer’s understanding of the relationship between risk profile & capital needs.
why does an insurer perform stress-testing [Hint: risk-complement-Cap-Liq]
[1] risk
- identify & control risk
[2] complement
- provide a complement to other risk management tools AND simulate shocks
[3] Cap
- support capital management
[4] Liq
- improve liquidity management
describe the stress-testing purpose: ‘risk identification & control’
- risk identification:
- identify concentrations & interactions of risks
- risk control:
- adjust individual portfolios or overall business strategy
describe the stress-testing purpose: ‘complementing other tools’
- test statistical models used to determine Value-at-Risk
- simulate SHOCKS to test model robustness to economic changes
describe the stress-testing purpose: ‘supporting capital management’
- identify severe events and/or compounding events that impact capital requirements
describe the stress-testing purpose: ‘improving liquidity management’
- assess liquidity profile and adequacy of buffers FOR institutional & market-wide stresses
describe how stress-testing is a key risk management tool for coverage of overland flooding
company won’t have historical data
==> identify flood risks using stress-testing models
==> estimate capital required to support flood risk in different scenarios
==> stress-testing could complement publicly available flood data
describe board vs. management responsibilities regarding a stress-testing program (3,3)
Board of Director’s responsibilities: * ultimate responsibility for program
* ensures implementation of program by management
* should be aware of key findings
Management’s responsibilities: * implement & manage stress-testing program
* identify PAS (Plausible Adverse Scenario)
* develop& implement risk mitigation strategies
* Identifying and describing the company’s risk appetite
identify 4 rudimentary considerations in stress-testing
R: RANGE (stress-testing should use a range of perspectives & techniques)
U: UPDATE (the stress-testing framework should be updated regularly)
D: DOCUMENTATION (proper documentation of methodology should be available)
I: INFRASTRUCTURE (the stress-testing infrastructure should be flexible if assumptions or methods change.)
What OSFI looks for in assessing a stress-testing program.
AFSV
APPROPRIATENESS: Are the scenarios appropriate for institution’s risk profile? Appetite?
VIABILITY: are scenarios included that compromise viability
FREQUENCY: is stress-tesing frequent enough for timely management action
SEVERE SHOCKS: do scenarios include severe shocks & sustained downturns
Regulator Considerations - stress testing
- scenarios chosen consistent w. risk appetite
- scenarios include severe shocks & downturn
- whether the frequency and timing of stress testing is sufficient to support timely management action
- capital might not be freely transferable within groups under adverse scenarios.
Evaluation of creating scenarios in a stress-testing program.
Comprehensive: scenarios should cover all important BUSINESS & PRODUCT lines
Non-historical: create NON-HISTORICAL scenarios (events that haven’t happened but COULD happen)
Downturn: severe & sustained DOWNTURNS (includes large losses, loss of reputation, legal problems,..)
compare and contrast scenario-testing with sensitivity-testing
scenario-testing:
- significant changes to risk factors
- observe future state including ripple effects & management actions over a longer time horizon
- more complex & comprehensive
sensitivity-testing:
- incremental changes to risk factors
- shock is more immediate & time horizon shorter
- simpler fewer resources required
focus areas in response to financial market turmoil (5)
- risk mitigation
- S&W (Securitization & Warehousing)
- Reputation (reputational risk)
- Credit risk (& Counter-party Risk)
- Concentration risk
describe focus areas when designing a stress-testing program for flood & provide examples
focus 1: - risk mitigation
focus 2: - reputation risk
focus 3: Counterparty credit risk
focus 4: Risk concentrations
focus 5: Capital management
focus 6: Liquidity risk
focus 7: Multiple perspectives
focus 8: Infrastructure for regular updates
identify & briefly describe the key elements of FCT (Financial Condition Testing) (5)
- Base scenario - must develop a base scenario (usually the insurer’s current business plan)
- Adverse scenario - must develop multiple adverse scenarios
(Ex: COVID, climate change, one of Alice’s legendary all-night dance parties) - Corrective action - identification and analysis of corrective management actions to mitigate risks
- Report - submit recommendations to management and the board of directors (or chief agent)
- Opinion - Appointed Actuary signs an opinion regarding the financial condition of the insurer
identify key metrics that must be understood when performing FCT (2)
- regulatory capital minimum(s)
- insurer’s internal target capital requirements ← determined by ORSA
identify the ‘preliminary’ step and the ‘extra’ step in addition to ‘BACRO’ when performing FCT
preliminary step:
- review financial position at year-end for each year in historical period
extra step at the end:
- identify possible regulatory action
what is a review of operations and financial position
- review balance sheet, statement of income, and source of earnings for an appropriate number of years
- analyze any trends in these numbers
what is the forecast period for FCT
- the forecast period should be long enough to capture
[1] risk emergence
[2] financial impacts
[3] ripple effects
[4] corrective action
→ generally 3-5 years although there is no minimum (should also be consistent with ORSA)