Civil Procedure Flashcards

(52 cards)

1
Q

Civ Pro Issues Checklist

A
  1. Proper Court Preliminary Issues
  2. Pretrial Procedures
  3. Disposition without Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Post-Trial
  6. Appeal
  7. Use of Final Judgment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proper Court Preliminary Issues Checklist

A
  1. Personal Jurisdiction 2. Subject Matter Jurisdiction 3. Supplemental Jurisdiction 4. Removal and Remand 5. Venue 6. Notice 7. Choice of Law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pretrial Procedures Checklist

A
  1. Pleadings 2. Joinder of Parties 3. Joinder of Claims 4. Class Action 5. Discovery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disposition without Trial Checklist

A
  1. Dismissal/Default 2. Motion for Summary Judgment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trial Checklist

A
  1. Right to Jury 2. Judgment as a Matter of Law/Directed Verdict in CA
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Post-Trial Checklist

A
  1. Renewed JMOL/JNOV in CA 2. New Trial 3. Motion to Set Aside Judgment 4. Remittitur/Additur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Appeal Checklist

A

Final Judgment Rule & Exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Use of Final Judgment Checklist

A
  1. Res judicata (claim preclusion) 2. Collateral estoppel (issue preclusion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Personal Jurisdiction (PJ)

A
  1. Tradition bases —Consent —Domiciled in Forum —Present & served 2. Modern: minimum contacts —Long-arm statute AND ——CA: to constitutional limits ——Specific statute: as limited —Nature of contacts ——Purposeful availment ——Foreseeability of being haled into court ——Relatedness ——Essentially at home —Fairness Factors ——Convenience ——State’s interest ——Other interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ)

A
  1. Federal Question 2. Diversity of Citizenship —Complete diversity required ——Person: domicile ——Corp: may have 2 - incorp state & PPB state (nerve ctr) ——Uninc Assoc: domicile of members ——Alienage: foreign citizen and US citizen —AND exceeds $75K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CA Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ)

A
  1. Unlimited case: exceeds $25K 2. Limited case: $25K or less 3. Small claims: person $10K, business $5K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Supplemental Jurisdiction

A
  1. Common nucleus of operative fact 2. Same transaction or occurrence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Removal Jurisdiction

A
  1. Defendants only may remove 2. 30 days - 1 year max
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Remand

A

To state court if removal improper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Venue

A
  1. Claim arose 2. D resides —Fed: any Ds reside, all in same state —CA: any D resides 3. Reside venue definition —Person: domicile —Corp: ——Fed: where subject to PJ ——CA: PPB, or K entered into, performed, or breached 4. Alternative - any D subject to PJ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Transfer of Venue

A
  1. Original venue proper —Fed: could’ve been filed or all consent —CA: interest of justice 2. Original venue improper —Fed: dismiss or transfer —CA: may transfer proper county —Forum Non Conveniens ——CA: interests of justice, public factors, private factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Notice

A
  1. Service of Process 2. Method of Service —Personal Service —Substituted Service: ——CA: must mail too only if personal service can’t be made —Constructive service 3. Service in Foreign Country
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Choice of Law

A
  1. Erie —State substantive law —Fed. procedural law —If unclear: ——outcome determinative test ——balancing test 2. CA conflict of law —Tort: comparative impairment test —K: depends on choice of law clause ——No clause: comparative impairment test ——Yes clause: OK if reasonable basis & no CA conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Federal v. CA Pleading

A

Fed: notice pleading CA: fact pleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Complaint Checklist

A
  1. Identify parties 2. Statement of claim & SMJ 3. Demand for judgment 4. Signature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a motion for a more definite statement in CA?

22
Q

What is a motion to strike pleadings in CA?

23
Q

Federal 12(b)6 motions

A
  1. Lack of SMJ 2. Lack of PJ - 1st response or else waived 3. Improper venue - 1st response or else waived 4. Insufficient process - 1st response or else waived 5. Insufficient service of process - 1st response or else waived 6. Failure to state a claim 7. Failure to join an indispensable party
24
Q

CA 1General Demurrer (unlimited cases)

A
  1. fail to state COA 2. lack of SMJ
25
CA Special Demurrer (unlimited cases)
1. uncertain pleading 2. liability theory unclear 3. lack of legal capacity 4. another case exists 5. misjoinder of parties 6. contract pleadings not okay 7. certificate if required
26
CA Motion to Quash
1. lack of PJ 2. insufficient process 3. insufficient service of process
27
Answer
1. Respond 2. Assert affirmative defenses
28
Fed Relation Back Doctrine
1. Claims: Same conduct, transaction, or occurrence 2. Defendants --- same conduct, transaction, or occurrence --- new party knew of action --- would have been named
29
CA: "Doe" Amendments
1. Timely filed 2. Genuine ignorance of: --- Identity of party --- Facts giving rise to action --- Law allows cause of action 3. Ignorance pled 4. 3 years to substitute
30
Joinder of parties - necessary party
1. No complete relief 2. interest harmed 3. Multiple inconsistent obligations
31
When do you join a necessary party?
PJ and diversity not destroyed. If can't join, court may dismiss because indispensible, or proceed without.
32
Impleader
D can add a 3d party D
33
Intervention
nonparty wants to join
34
Interpleader
property holder wants single lawsuit
35
Compulsory v. Permissive Counterclaim
Compulsory: 1. same tx or occurrence 2. supplemental jx will extend Permissive: 1. not same tx or occurrence 2. supplemental jx will not extend
36
Cross claim (cross complaint in CA): against co-party
1. Not compulsory 2. Same tx or occurrence 3. Supplemental jx will extend
37
Fed requirements for class actions
1. Numerosity 2. Commonality 3. Typicality 4. Adequacy
38
Fed Class Actions: Type of Class
1. Prejudice 2. Injunctive relief sought 3. Questions of law/fact common to class predominate
39
Fed Class Actions: Citizenship Issues
1. Diversity - named rep 2. Class Action Fairness Act --- Any class member diverse --- Aggregate exceeds $5M --- 100+ class members
40
CA Class Action
- no types 1. Ascertainable class 2. Member community interest --- Common questions of law or fact --- Adequate representative --- Class substanital benefit
41
Rule 26 Mandatory Disclosures
1. Initial disclosures 2. Expert information 3. Pretrial witnesses & documents
42
Discovery Tools
1. Depositions 2. Interrogatories 3. Request for admissions 4. Request to inspect and produce 5. Electronically stored data 6. Physical or mental exams Note: CA limited cases have less discovery
43
Scope of Discovery
1. Need not be admissible 2. No attorney work product
44
Types of dismissal
1. Voluntary 2. Involuntary 3. Failure to state a claim
45
Motion for summary judgment (MSJ)
No genuine issue of material fact & entitled to judgment as matter of law
46
Federal v. CA right to jury trial
Fed: legal, then equity CA: equity, then legal
47
Judgment as a Matter of Law (CA Directed Verdict)
Reasonable people could not disagree
48
Fed Renewed JMOL v. CA JNOV
Fed: only allowed if JMOL first CA: not required to file DV first
49
Conditional New Trial on Damages
Remittitur: damages too high Additur: damages too low (not allowed in Fed)
50
Final Judgment Rule (FJR) Exceptions
1. injunctions 2. collateral issues 3. multiple claims/parties 4. extraordinary writ 5. certification of class action
51
Res Judicata (claim)
1. Valid final judgment on the merits --- Fed: final when rendered --- CA: final when appeals done 2. Same P & same D 3. Same claim --- Fed: same tx or occurrence --- CA: primary rights theory
52
Collateral Estoppel (issue)
1. Valid final judgment on the merits --- Fed: final when rendered --- CA: final when appeals done 2. Same issue actually litigated 3. Issue was necessarily determed (essential to judgment) 4. Use against party/privity only 5: Use by: --- Fed: party or privy only --- CA: stranger allowed if fair ------ Defensive use - fair opportunity to be heard ------ Offensive use - if fair and equitable