Claim & Issue Preclusion Flashcards

1
Q

If claim preclusion applies…

A

the claim will be dismissed or summary judgment can be entered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If issue preclusion applies…

A

it streamlines the litigation in case 2 by deeming an issue in that case established in case 2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Res judicata means that a claimant may…

A

only seek recovery for all rights to relief for that claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The requirements for a claim to be precluded or barred are:

A
  1. Same P v. Same D;
  2. Entry of final judgment on the merits in Case 1;
  3. Case 1 & Case 2 are asserting the same claim (same T & O).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An issue will be precluded from litigation when:

A
  1. Case 1 ended on a final judgment on the merits;
  2. Same issue was actually litigated and determined in case 1;
  3. Issue litigated was essential to case 1;
  4. Issue is being precluded against a party or in privity with a party;
  5. By who is the issue being precluded?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defensive nonmutual issue preclusion occurs when…

A

a person asserting preclusion to avoid liability was not a party to the case.

(federal law says this is okay as long as the person against who you are using it had a full chance to litigate the issue in case 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Offensive nonmutual issue preclusion occurs when…

A

the person asserting preclusion to support a claim was not a party to Case 1.

Typically only allowed if it would be fair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The fairness issues the court will look at to determine if offensive nonmutual issue preclusion is allowed are:

A
  1. If the party had a full opportunity to litigate in case 1;
  2. If the party had a strong incentive to litigate in case 1;
  3. If the party asserting issue preclusion could have easily joined in case 1; and
  4. Any inconsistent findings on the issue.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly