Class 1 Flashcards
(29 cards)
This course is designed to help you learn
Principles associated with designing and managing teams
Common errors that are typically unconscious and often lead to unethical behavior
Practical skills
A group is?
two or more people interacting with each other
A team is?
two or more people who are interdependent in terms of information, resources, and skills and who together work towards a common goal
What makes a good team?
Compelling direction: do we have a common goal that is clear, challenging but not impossible, and consequential?
Strong Structure: Do we have the right number and mix of members? Are people responsible? Do we have clear norms for acceptable conduct?
Supportive Context: do we have the resources, information, and training we need? Are these appropriate rewards for success?
Shared Mindset: do the team members have a strong common identity? Do we readily share information with one another
*The secrets of great teamwork
Team performance measurement criteria
- team results (productivity, efficiency, quality, innovation)
- Team member satisfaction and well-being
Advantages of Teams
- Potential to increase performance, innovation, and motivation
- brings complementary skills, experiences, information
- diversity
- social benefits
Disadvantages of Teams
- time consuming
- coordination problems
- conflict and disagreement
- diffusion of responsibility (free-riders and social loafing)
Group Productivity:
Actual productivity = Potential productivity - *process losses + synergistic gain
process losses
= effort & motivation, ability, coordination
Effort and motivation losses - Causes?
- social loafing
- sucker effects
- diffusion of responsibility and bystander effect
- reduced sense of self efficacy
Effort and motivation losses - Solutions?
- clarify expectations early; develop written contract
- assign interesting, challenging, meaningful tasks
- Make member contributions identifiable
- build trust among members
- offer frequent feedback
- reward members’ performance
- keep group size small
- have an action plan
Bystander apythy/diffusion of responsibility
- Video example - less likely to intervene when others are present
Ability Losses -Causes?
- dominant response set (dominant response is “the reaction elicited most quickly and easily by a given stimulus)
- evaluation apprehension (choking)
- Social impairment (fear, shyness)
Ability Losses - Solutions?
- Establish a climate of psychological safety
- build trust among members
- share expertise; improve individual members’ capabilities
- practice as a team -> build muscle memory/correct dominant response
Coordination Losses - Causes?
- Failure to discuss the coordination approach explicitly beforehand and during
- poor work process design (redundancy, omissions, inappropriate assignments to members)
- insufficient information sharing
- conceptual blocking
Coordination Losses - Solutions?
- Discuss coordination strategies at the beginning and reassess them during the task
- encourage members to share information
- train members as a team
- practice as a team
- keep group size small
Six basic dimensions of real teams?
- small number
- complementary skills (technical, task management, interpersonal)
- committed to common purpose
- committed to performance goals
- committed to common approach
- mutually accountable
- high-performing teams
- high commitment, intensity, and mutual concern for one another
Team performance cycle:
Transition phase: Planning * identify goals * develop plans to achieve goals * Identify process losses and ways to reduce them Action Phase: Doing * carry out plans * monitor performance
What Google learned from it’s quest to build a perfect team (Class 1)
The researchers eventually concluded that what distinguished the ‘‘good’’ teams from the dysfunctional groups was how teammates treated one another. The right norms, in other words, could raise a group’s collective intelligence, whereas the wrong norms could hobble a team, even if, individually, all the members were exceptionally bright.
First, on the good teams, members spoke in roughly the same proportion, a phenomenon the researchers referred to as ‘‘equality in distribution of conversational turn-taking.’
Second, the good teams all had high ‘‘average social sensitivity’’ — a fancy way of saying they were skilled at intuiting how others felt based on their tone of voice, their expressions and other nonverbal cues. One of the easiest ways to gauge social sensitivity is to show someone photos of people’s eyes and ask him or her to describe what the people are thinking or feeling — an exam known as the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. People on the more successful teams in Woolley’s experiment scored above average on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. They seemed to know when someone was feeling upset or left out. People on the ineffective teams, in contrast, scored below average. They seemed, as a group, to have less sensitivity toward their colleagues.
Psychological Safety
To have Matt stand there and tell us that he’s sick and he’s not going to get better and, you know, what that means,’’ Laurent said. ‘‘It was a really hard, really special moment.’’
The team grew and was better because of psychological safety
Why Teams Don’t Work (Class 1)
Teams must be real - people need to know who is on the team and who is not.
Teams need a compelling direction- Members need to know and agree upon what they are supposed to be doing together.
Teams need enabling structures - Teams that have poorly designed tasks, the wrong number or mix of members get in trouble
Teams need supportive organization - The organizational context - reward system, human resource system and the information system
Teams need expert coaching - Teams need coaching as a group in team processes
Example: Gives the example of the CFO not being on the executive committee because he didn’t work well in a team environment. There were bruised feelings at first but in the end the committee could become a real team and the CFO was much happier not having to go to meetings.
The things that happen the first time a group meets strongly affect how a group will operate throughout it’s existence.
Compares Commercial pilots and their teams being new all the time to that of the SAC and how their team was together and was a well oiled machine working in harmony.
A working Definition and Discipline (Class 1)
Small Number
Complementary skills - technical or functional expertise, Problem solving and decision making skills, interpersonal skills
Committed to a common purpose and performance goals
Specific goal or goals
Committed to a common approach
Mutual accountability
We are all Bystanders (Class 1)
In one of their studies, college students sat in a cubicle and were instructed to talk with fellow students through an intercom. They were told that they would be speaking with one, two, or five other students, and only one person could use the intercom at a time.
Eighty-five percent of the participants who were in the two-person situation, and hence believed they were the only witness to the victim’s seizure, left their cubicles to help. In contrast, only 62 percent of the participants who were in the three-person situation and 31 percent of the participants in the six-person situation tried to help.
Diffusion of Responsibility
Darley and Latané also suspected that bystanders don’t intervene in an emergency because they’re misled by the reactions of the people around them. To test this hypothesis, they ran an experiment in which they asked participants to fill out questionnaires in a laboratory room. After the participants had gotten to work, smoke filtered into the room—a clear signal of danger.
When participants were alone, 75 percent of them left the room and reported the smoke to the experimenter. With three participants in the room, only 38 percent left to report the smoke. And quite remarkably, when a participant was joined by two confederates instructed not to show any concern, only 10 percent of the participants reported the smoke to the experimenter.
Differing Work Styles Can help team Performance (Class 2)
In any office you will find four basic types of people:
Logical, analytical, and data-oriented
Organized, plan-focused, and detail-oriented
Supportive, expressive, and emotionally oriented
Strategic, integrative, and idea-oriented
Observe you team members - look for their ‘tells’
Ex. does she complete work early, send emails too long or too short, gestures while speaking… etc.
Leverage everyone’s strengths
Coach according to style