Clinical Ethics and Law (CEL) Flashcards
(193 cards)
Outline the first principle of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA)?
A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he/she lacks capacity
Outline the second principle of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA)?
A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him/her to do so have been taken without success
Outline the third principle of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA)?
A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because he/she makes an unwise decision
Outline the fourth principle of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA)?
Any act done, or decision made, under the Mental Capacity Act for, or on behalf of, a person who lacks capacity must be done, or made, in his/her best interests
Outline the fith principle of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA)?
Before any act is done, or any decision is made, regard must be had to whether the purpose for which it is needed can be as effectively achieved in a way that is less restrictive of the person’s rights and freedom of action
What questions need to be asked of the patient as part of the functional test of decision making when assessing capacity? (4)
Is the patient able to;
- understand all of the relevant information
- retain that information
- use and/or weigh-up that information as part of the decision making process
- communicate a decision
Should a patient who is refusing a treatment be treated if they are deemed to have capacity?
No; refusals of treatment must be respected, unless in a situation where the Mental Health Act (MHA) applies
Should a patient who is requesting a treatment be treated if they are deemed to have capacity?
No; doctors are not obliged to provide treatment requested by the patient if they believe that treatment to be harmful or futile
Should a patient who is consenting to a treatment be treated if they are deemed to have capacity?
Yes; treatment may proceed lawfully provided the patient is giving voluntary and informed consent
If a patient is deemed to lack the capacity to make a decision in the first instance, what should be done before considering whether to treat or not to treat?
Steps to maximise their capacity; for example use of word boards in patients that cannot communicate
Which two legal frameworks can be used to determine whether or not to treat a patient who lacks capacity? (2)
- Advanced Decision to Refuse Treatment (ADRT); a decision made in advance to refuse a specific type of treatment in the future
- Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA); a person nominated to make a decision regarding treatment that is in line with the patient’s own best interests
Which additional conditions are required to be met by advanced decision (AD) documentation in order for the refusal life-saving or life-sustaining treatment to be legally-binding? (4)
- Must be written
- Must be signed
- Must be witnessed
- Must include a clear sentence stating that the decision is to be upheld even if the patient’s life is at risk
How should a clinician decide on whether or not to treat a patient who lacks capacity if they do not have a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) or any Advanced Decisions to Refuse Treatment (ADRT)?
A decision on whether or not to treat should be made in line with what that clinician believes is in the best interest of that patient
Who can clinicians consult with in order to ascertain what is in the best interests of a patient who lacks capacity to consent/refuse a treatment? (2)
- People who know the patient well
- Independent mental capacity advocates (IMCAs)
Outline the aspects that need to be considered prior to making a best interest decision? (7)
- Likelihood of a regain of capacity
- Effort made to encourage the patient’s participation in the decision
- Past and present wishes and feelings
- Beliefs and values
- Emotional bonds, family obligations
- Consultation with anyone named by the person to
Outline the components of legally valid consent? (3)
- Competent; patient has mental capacity to decide to agree to the act
- Informed; patient provided with information as to the nature and purpose of the act
- Voluntary; not coerced, obtained under duress or undue influence
When it comes to conset for treatment, which two pillars of medical ethics need to be considered and balanced? (2)
- Beneficence; obligation of the physician to act so as to benefit the patient
- Respect for autonomy; ability of the patient to act deliberately and in accordance with their values
For consent to be ‘informed’ what information must be provided to the patient? (3)
- All options available to them including to do nothing
- Nature of the act and the purpose including expected benefits
- Risks associated with each option
Outline the two key components that need to be covered when discussing the risks to a patient of a particular intervention? (2)
- What a ‘reasonable patient’ would want to know
- Any additional information that the specific patient wants to know
Outline the two components that make up the capacity assessment? (2)
- Diagnostic threshold; does the patient have a disorder or impairment in the function of their mind or brain
- Functional test; can they demonstrate the ability to make a relevant a decision for themself
Under what circumstances would a patient fail the functional test of decision making that makes up part of the capacity assessment?
If they are unable to do any one or more of the four tasks that make up the functional test (understand, retain, weigh-up/use, communicate)
In order for a patient who meets the diagnostic threshold component of the capacity assessment, what other feature must be demonstrated in order for them to be deemed to lack capacity?
Patients with a known disturbance in functioning of mind or brain MUST also be demonstrated to not have the ability to make a relevant decision in order for them to be deemed to lack capacity
Outline the key assertion of the Fraser Guidelines?
In order to treat children under 16, the consent of a person with parental responsibility, or the prior authorisation of the Courts, is required before treatment can be given
Outline the key exception to the Fraser Guidelines?
Treatment of a patient under the age of 16 years can proceed provided that they are consenting for such treatment and that they have be proven to be ‘Gillick competent’