Clinical Research Associate / Research Administrator Flashcards
(50 cards)
what important twin studies do you know about specific to psychology
newbauer study
separation of orphaned identical twins and triplets into homes with different economic climates
anything to do with genetic component and ‘risk’ of mental health illness
e.g Sz
9% for 1st degree relative, 27% for children with 2 affected parents and 50% for MZ twins
basic principle that in MZ twins reared in different environments, the % risk of concordance is indicative of the genetic heritability of disorder
- lack of consideration of shared / differences during prenatal environment
what important twin studies do you know about
by twinsuk
ultraprocessed foods
identical twins - same nutritional values food but one UP and one whole food
blood sugar and fat level increased, with headaches and not satiated
PREDICT
no one size fits all for dietary advice as even in MZ twins reaction to food groups and same diet is not the same
- variation in blood responses
- MZ only shared 37% of gut bacteria (strangers is 35%)
what is the general utility of using twins (i.e Mz vs Dz and the science behind it)
monozygotic = identical - 100% same dna genomes and always the same gender - developed from 1 embryo (fertilisation of one egg by one sperm)
- idea is if something is largely influenced by genetics, you would expect to see similar levels / prevalence in MZ twins (& at the same time reveals the extent of environmental influence)
dizygotic (fraternal) = non-identical - developed from 2 separate embryos (fertilisation of 2 eggs by 2 sperms)
genotype & phenotype
geno - combination of alleles possessed for a specific gene - purely from parents
pheno - combination of individuals observable characteritstics and traits - influenced by ^ & environmental, lifestyle and epigenetics (how env influence gene expression) factors
have to consider the equal environments assumption - assuming that extent to which MZ and DZ twins share the same environments is the same - this may not be the case
how will i demonstrate the px always comes first + create a safe and positive experience for them
How do you handle participant queries or concerns to ensure a positive experience?
Can you describe a time you had to manage a difficult or unresponsive participant? How did you handle the situation?
taking time to listen, read and understand the information provided by participants and their family members both over the phone, email, and in written information.
Should I either be told or get the sense that they are having a more negative experience, or do not feel completely safe, I would urgently flag this to the appropriate team member, as a priority, to demonstrate the patient always comes first.
prev demonstrated in research by flagging data decline to relevant team members and inclusive and safe experience for blind patient in exercise class
TwinsUK example: despite being ‘eligible’ considering the symptoms of a patient with mci and the comfortability and suitability in taking part in the MRI study, considering issues with informed consent, and liased with mri team + clinic team to ensure safe, comfortable visit, with twin having to leave the room at points - thanked me for my clear communication and coordination of the day
what is my understanding of the term ‘good clinical practice’
& what is the general purpose of healthcare research?
policy knowledge: GDPR, data proection act, mental capacity act
agreed international standard for conducting clinical research
GCP in research means you will (look for a sum-up of the training we undertake):
protect the rights and safety of patients taking part in research studies
collect reliable research data
(by the NIHR - national institute for health and care research)
purpose: - through evidence-based solutions
* improving health outcomes
* improving patient wellbeing
* impacting health policies
ethics approved by HRA (health research authority)
IRAS - international research application system
correct receival of informed consent - both at the time of signing up and prior to the study on the day & provision of a detailed PIS (strengths and weaknesses of taking part, where will data be stored, what samples will be taken, what results, how data will be used)
keeping an up to date delegation & protocol log of all staff members involved, signed, with research CV, training they need / have undertaken (e.g facility induction and redcap use), and their roles within the study
The rights, safety, and well-being of participants are the most important considerations and should prevail over the interests of science and society.
what are the administrative duties i have undertaken in chief-pd (currrent role)?
large scale data entry
large scale scanning and uploading of documents into correct folders, marking information onto the correct spreadsheets
collection of data from another site
sending out of studies materials
relaying patient queries to the correct staff member
what are the administrative duties i have undertaken in a primary care setting?
use of systmone and outcomes4health (learnt very quickly)
communication to patients, allied health professionals and third party bodies via email, referrals, telephones and post
reporting results, booking appointments, answering queries etc.
some patients were involved in studies so receipt of study documentation
What interests you about this position and why do you think you’d be a good fit?
first, cover why you want that position - why i’m interested (what about the role I want to learn e.g managerial, monitoring level, aligns with my strengths and career path
* interests: the possibility to use my current strong admin, recruitment, and study knowledge background, within this organisation, studies, and participant base, to elevate my current research career to contribute towards creating and amending core participant communications, problem-solve recruitment demands, facilitate multi-disciplinary team discussions, monitor study processes and progress, and having a strong role in reporting of study progess
* a few of my strengths include communication, both within and between various clinical teams (honed at GP) and with participants (over the phone and via email), strong organisation, time-management and prioritisation skills (completing masters alongside part-time 0-hours role, to ensure I got the best and my maximum contribution to both) and creative, knowledge based problem-solving, with a participant-centred approach
second, mention why specifically at twinsuk - thriving in this department, training, presenting, setting up scheduling meetings - want to progress my research career here
*
- have worked in my current role for just over a year, have put everything into it and have got a lot out of it, including the proactive training of a new staff members, development of unique communication templates, and recently intiating meetings and conversations across teams to aid recruitment, scheduling, and case-by-case problem solving, importantly knowing I would like to continue my career in research assistance and facilitation within this organisation, and using my unique knowledge base and recruitment stand point to positively contribute to this ASM role - discovered my ambition to continue and elevate my career in research
third: fast, timely handover to a knowledgable and fast learner who already understands the core of twins and mri study
- maternity cover requires a smooth handover, to someone willing and adept at learning fast, preferably with a foundational understanding of the role and the organisation (I fit this)
How have you tracked study and participant progress in previous roles? What tools or methods have you used?
leaving audit trails through various databases including redcap, systmone, and the admin and access dbs, excel spreadsheets
make a physical, timed note to ensure certain participants or queries are not missed and are dealt with within the appropriate times - keeping in mind the availability of relevant staff members + understanding who to contact in case of absence
collated and reported on current recruitment across a range of studies through keeping track of recruitment numbers, queries, and challenges, feeding back in a clear manner and asking appropriate questions to enable assistance/ set up conversations between different teams
what is involved in annual progress reports: what is currently being done e.g which meetings occur, how many twins have been seen, in line with targets, and how many we are hoping to see, who is in which role, any ethics updates
Can you describe a time when you identified a delay or issue in a study and how you addressed it?
Issue with automated emails, ensured that this issue was reported but at the same time ensured to send a manual email and keep a spreadsheet when reported in specific cases, to make sure recruitment not delayed
reducing the time taken to respond to participant queries and the number of participant contacts through creation of universal, but editable templates, keeping these updated, and recently encouraged other team members to include mention of other studies within the first recruitment email to ensure maximum study take-up
How do you ensure effective communication and collaboration with operational teams?
Have you ever worked with cross-functional teams? How did you handle any conflicts or miscommunications?
Describe a situation where there was a disagreement or conflicting priorities among team members. How did you facilitate a resolution
I am an active listener, which allows me to ask intuitive, to the point questions, for conversations to be as impactful and useful to all parties involved as possible
- I will keep in mind challenges to each team member & the knowledge they posses, to make sure the benefit of each collaborator is maximised e.g collating and summarising zygosity queries to the attention of my boss as well as the head of the lab team, expressing their urgency, being involved in the set-up of meetings, the development of a plan of action and importantly, the constant relaying and feedback to the participants urgently querying this, until a timely, faster solution was delivered and a standard set for future situations
my current role deals with cross-functional and multi-disciplinary teams daily, as twin queries often require communication with multiple team members across and external to the department
- miscommunications: keeping a precise and detailed audit trail to refer back to, taking ownership of anything unclear presented on my behalf, and feedback once a miscommunication has been resolved
- conflicts: personally and professionally I am strongly against conflict and handle stressful, testing situations calmly and rationally, making sure both parties are heard and understood - reflect to ensure this does not happen again, put procedures in place
- have witnessed and knowledge of workplace conflicts and having reflected on these, can often come about through personality clashes, or one/both members not feeling listened to / prioritising their teams needs - important to consider both sides, see from other POV and compromise by undertanding prioties and boundaries of the opposite party
Can you give an example of a process you implemented to improve study management?
study delivery: simply asking participants to tell us the best time to call, for control over our time rather than continuous phone disruptions
providing accurate, relevant feedback both proactively and when asked, on challenges, queries, and positives during recruitment, study queries and processes
describe the chief-pd trial? what have i learnt about clinical research whilst working there?
cholinersterase inhibitors to prevent falls in parkinsons disease
bristol med school - ageing and movement research group
- with PD, experienced a fall within previous year
largest trial using a novel drug treatment in the uk
600 participants from 39 uk sites
on cholinesterase inhibitors through transdermal patches (typically used for ppl with memory problems)
manage priorities under pressure
admin & booking for covid clinic alongside regular running of gp with reduced staff
what is twins uk?
health study of over 16 000 uk twins
multiple studies at one time
largest uk adults twin registry and most clinically detailed in the world
> 18 y/o
any questions?
PROSPECT study: particular interest of mine - haven’t worked on a diet specific study, particularly with a focus on motivations (dietary advice) and prevention, in a population beyond twins - working in the community presents a new challenge here
* Will there be an opportunity to be involved in this study as it begins to be rolled out and in what capacity
MRI study - as there is now ongoing data to be analysed, when might some preliminary findings/conclusions from different researchers begin to emerge using MRI data combined with twinsuk vast 30 year collection of health and historical linked data - can this be expected before the conclusion of the study in 3 years time? - will this influence the role / be something I will be involved with
facts to know about guys and st thomas’ research centre?
1 of 8 accredited health sciences research centres in the uk linked with king’s health partners
number 1 trust for clinical research in london
values the post holder requires?
put patients first
take pride in what they do
respect others
strive to be the best
act with integrity (honest and moral)
will you be able to acquire and communicate ‘excellent knowledge of current studies’
presentation and critique of screening tool in africa for cognitive deficits in those with HIV
high scoring and deep understanding of the research and the sphere it was in
what do you think your daily role would look like?
dynamic and fast-past, able to prioritise a diverse list of tasks throughout the day and across the week / month and willing to switch between jobs - keeping time-scheduled spreadsheets to stay on top of different prioritised workloads to avoid any backlogs and ensure timely completion
Maintaining clear and constant communication with admin and mri teams (e.g greeting and checking in at the start of each week), chairing and taking part in stakeholder meetings, including taking minutes, feeding back on study recruitment, engagement and challenges to operational meetings and in KPIs
weekly going over next batch uploads, % responses vs numbers invited, recruitment strategy with admin, checking charts for twins progress through the different stages of booking, collating recruitment information to contribute to weekly progress reports in kpis and annual reports
keep an eye on audits, and audit in any response to queries / challenges e.g twin arrival time, scan time - good way to monitor complaints
aware of twins feedback and any queries arising
Keeping on top of new staff training, study materials, their laptops, and running audits to ensure training up to date and data entry complete
what environmental influences can you think of?
gender (DZ)
culture
friend group
educational attainment
mental health
treatment by parents
teamwork
in research - dissertations, understood my strength was in data management and processing, took this job as I knew I could do it fastest
in healthcare - getting px her medication by end of day - ended in 2 positive reviews - good at delegating tasks and being realistic with my own timelines and able to ask for help
last minute recruitment - phoning and coordinating accom, travel as well as feeding back to team members before the deadline esp. for mris, good at coordinating when multiple contacts with the same twin, effectively relaying information to gauge help in the situation
Reflection / final statement - a good team player but also very comfortable with taking the lead, either when asked or proactively, using my strengths to benefit the team as well as understanding my limitations in terms of time, to effectively delegate
integrity
owning up to confidentiality error - early on in job and could have hidden behind superiors
ensured to contact the patient, take accountability, explain the situation and complaints protocol, gave the contact of the PM, px ended up being ok
workplace conflict
if unable to sort it myself, discuss sensitively with relevant team leaders and try to sort it at the level the situation occured rather than bringing more people in with escalation