Clinical studies Flashcards

Recall p-values and confidence intervals Clinical trial design: recognise the significance and key components in clinical trial design, identify potential biases and limitations and interpret the findings presented from clinical trials Case control and cohort studies: compare and explain the features of case-control and cohort studies, list the individual strengths and weaknesses and evaluate their appropriateness for answering research questions Health data: recall the major sources of healt (56 cards)

1
Q

What is a p-value? And what can be determined about p-values in relation to significance of a result?

A

It determines the likelihood that something is down to chance. P = 0.05 suggests that the probability of a result being the result of chance is 5%. P < 0.05 (less than 0.05) is used as a test of significance, whereby if p<0.05 (less than), the probability the result is due to chance is less than 5%, and the result is significant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are confidence intervals?

A

Repeated sampling will produce a spread of estimates around the true value, and confidence intervals can be used to show where 95% of sample estimates will lie; this allows us to be confident that the true value lies somewhere within this interval e.g. +/- 95mmol/mol.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a clinical trial?

A

Planned experiment in humans to measure the effectiveness of an intervention. There is a comparator (placebo) and inclusion and exclusion criteria.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the type of study used in a clinical trial? (x3 points)

A

NOT observational. Randomisation. Double-blind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the four phases of a clinical trial?

A

PHASE ONE – SAFETY: tests on the safety of treatment performed on healthy volunteers. PHASE TWO – BIOLOGICAL EFFECT: could it actually work? A few hundred with the condition are recruited. Safety is reviewed, and look at whether treatment is effective in the short term. PHASE THREE – OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS: will it work in the real world? Compares the treatment with a placebo: studies effectiveness and side effects. Needs several thousand patients. PHASE 4 – AFTER MARKETING: the effects are measured in the various populations. Rare side effects that were not picked up earlier are identified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is allocation bias?

A

Volunteers may not be randomly allocated to placebo and treatment groups, and as such confounding variables may influence the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is measurement bias?

A

If the investigation team has pre-conceived ideas or vested interest, they may subconsciously interpret the results differently, so double-blinding is key to ensure unbiased measurement and interpretation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is reporting bias?

A

Negative and neutral trials are unlikely to be reported, especially if commercially embarrassing to a pharmaceutical company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is analysis bias?

A

If differential discontinuation occurs (more participants withdraw from one group than the other e.g. because of side effects), this can skew the analysis to show a larger than accurate benefit in that group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the two types of error in a clinical trial?

A

Type 1 error – false positives (alpha). Type 2 error – false negatives (beta).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is power measured in relation to the errors of a clinical trial?

A

1 – beta (%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the typical value for power in a clinical trial?

A

80-90%.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the power of a test tell us (in relation to errors in a clinical trial)?

A

It is the probability that the test will find a significant difference between two populations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Experiment Event Rate? How is it calculated?

A

EER: incidence of a NEGATIVE OUTCOME (response to drug, adverse event, death) in the experimental group (the group getting the drug). Calculated by: look at photo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Control Event Rate? How is it calculated?

A

CER: incidence of a negative OUTCOME in the control group (the group getting the placebo). Calculated by: look at photo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is relative risk calculated in relation to EER and CER?

A

EER/CER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How is relative risk reduction calculated in relation to EER and CER?

A

(CER-EER)/CER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is relative risk reduction?

A

It is the relative decrease in risk of an adverse event in the exposed group compared to the unexposed group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is absolute risk reduction?

A

It is the difference between the risk of an outcome in the exposed group and the unexposed group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How is absolute risk reduction calculated?

A

CER-EER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the ‘number needed to treat’ defined as, and how do you calculate it?

A

Number you need to treat in order to avoid one additional negative outcome/event (negative outcome is usually in relation to the control group). Calculated by 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction). Smaller value indicates more effective treatment. Just think of all the calculations involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What would the relationship between EER and CER be if an intervention was effective?

A

EER would be LESS than CER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are case-control studies?

A

Start with a source population, containing a group of cases and group of controls – where the control group are representative of the case group (e.g. both groups have same ethnicity, sex…). Looking retrospectively, compare the odds of exposure in those with the disease and those without, to see if those that have the disease were more likely to have been exposed – this will produce an ODDS RATIO.

24
Q

What are cohort studies?

A

These can be performed retrospectively (possibility of bias, cheaper) or prospectively (less bias, expensive), and involve starting with a HEALTHY cohort of volunteers (in the case of prospective), and following them up over time to study the effect of exposure on outcomes. The cohort is divided at analysis to the exposed and unexposed, and then the risk of the outcome in question is studied to provide a RELATIVE RISK.

25
What are the advantages and disadvantages of case-control studies? (x3 and x4)
ADVANTAGES: good for rare disease with fewer cases, quick and cost effective, can investigate many exposures simultaneously. DISADVANTAGES: recall bias because performed retrospectively (and because may introduce ideas to those with disease risking explanation), poor for rare exposures, uncertainty of exposure-disease time relationship, difficult to select controls that are representative of the population of cases (can use friends/family).
26
What are the advantages and disadvantages of cohort studies? (x3 and x3)
ADVANTAGES: can study multiple outcomes simultaneously, can follow the natural history of the disease (for prospective studies), prospective studies eliminate bias. DISADVANTAGES: inefficient for rare diseases, expensive and time consuming, loss to follow-up can introduce bias.
27
What are case-control studies appropriate for?
Are appropriate for the determination of what causes rare disease, but are not as good evidence as an RCT because they are observational and may be strongly affected by confounders. These are only appropriate to SUGGEST AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN EXPOSURE AND DISEASE – that must then be investigated further.
28
What are the cohort studies appropriate for?
Are higher on the hierarchy of evidence, and a relative risk carries more than an odds ratio. These are appropriate to ANSWER RESEARCH QUESTIONS THAT SEEK TO QUANTIFT THE EFFECT THAT EXPOSURE HAS ON SPECIFIC OUTCOMES. It can be used to confirm or challenge suspected associations e.g. from case control studies.
29
What carries more weight: relative risk or odds ratio?!
Relative risk!
30
What is routine data?
Collected routinely without a research question in mind. Often for administrative or statutory purposes.
31
What is coding in relation to collecting data?
Health outcomes such as deaths, adverse effects, admissions… are given unique codes under a system such as ICD10 to allow for classification and comparison.
32
What are the disadvantages of coding for collecting data? (x2)
The codes can change. Reporting is not always standardised. May be different in different areas, so interpretation can differ - isn't this what standardisation means anyway?
33
List five types of routine data in healthcare.
Healthcare outcomes e.g. deaths, admissions… Exposures and Health determinants e.g. pollution, crime… Demographic e.g. census. Geographical e.g. location of healthcare facilities. Health Service Provision e.g. staff/bed counts.
34
What main health outcome data is routinely collected in the UK? (x9)
MORTALITY – sent to ONS for processing. CANCER – voluntary notification to local registry, but also noted on death certificates. NOTIFICATION OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE – reported by doctors to local authority for monitoring. TERMINATIONS – must be recorded. CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES. HOSPITAL EPISODE STATISTICS – contains details of all admissions. QOFS – pay per performance for GPs – rewards practices for quality of care, determined by how well doctors manage chronic disease. RTAs.
35
What are the three major sources of health data in the UK?
Census. Health Survey for England. NHS staff/patient surveys.
36
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the three major sources of health data in the UK? (x4 and x5)
Census, Health Survey, NHS staff/patient surveys. STRENGTHS: cheap, data already collected and in a standardised fashion, relatively comprehensive with entire population coverage, wide range of recorded data available for a large number of years. WEAKNESSES: may not answer the question, incomplete ascertainment if not every case is captured, variable quality (based on the use of coding/diagnosis), variable validity, disease labelling/coding may change over time or by area.
37
What are standardised mortality rates?
Ratio between the number of deaths in a study population and the number that would be expected, accounting for age and sex.
38
How are standardised mortality rates calculated?
Observed deaths/expected deaths.
39
What would standard mortality rates of less than 1, 1, and more than 1 denote?
LESS THAN 1: fewer than expected number of deaths. 1: same as expected. MORE THAN 1: more deaths than expected.
40
What is the clinical significance of using standardised mortality rates?
Age standardised death rates can be given for a given condition or for the population as a whole. Can be used to assess the effectiveness of a country’s health system and compare populations e.g. whether they are dying more of one disease etc. Remember, that SMRs compare observed rates of mortality to expected rates of mortality.
41
Why should standard mortality rates be treated with caution?
Differences in reporting, diagnostics, coding and behaviour can all affect SMRs and cause ‘alarming increases’ that do not actually translate to massively increased incidence or mortality.
42
What is the purpose of a systematic review?
Seek to answer a very specific question; all published literature is considered, and studies that are appropriate are selected and evaluated, and the data is reported to provide a definitive answer.
43
What is the purpose of a meta-analysis?
Use of statistical methods to summarise the results of the selected studies, weighting by how well performed and powerful the study was; generates a pooled risk estimate. Meta-analyses are conducted in the context of a systematic review.
44
How can publication bias be assessed?
Publication bias can be assessed with a funnel plot.
45
What is PICOS?
Research question should define a Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome(s), Study Design.
46
Give an example of a database of systematic reviews?
Cochrane library.
47
What is the process used to write a Systematic Review?
1. Plan the review using PICOS. 2. Identify the research available using databases such as Medline, looking at referenced papers, and at research that was not published; then select studies that meet the criteria for inclusion and quality assess these. 3. Use a meta-analysis to generate a pooled risk estimate, weighing the effect of size of each study to produce a forest plot. 4. Report study details in a meaningful way – use guidelines such as STROBE/STRAND.
48
What is a forest plot?
Used to show the pooled risk estimate. Based on the weighted risk ratios of the included study.
49
What are the limitations of systematic reviews/meta analyses? (x3)
Incompleteness – may not be able to access all data due to lack of publication or language barrier etc. e.g. some reviews just study papers written in English. Publication bias. Heterogeneity – studied differ with respect to PICOS – studies may differ based on clinical differences and unknown study characteristics – could affect results between studies.
50
How can heterogeneity be measured?
I^2 is a measure of heterogeneity. 0% indicates something is fully homogenous. 50% indicates moderate heterogeneity.
51
How can heterogeneity in systematic reviews be accounted for? (x2)
Can use meta-regression and sensitivity analysis.
52
What is a funnel plot? What does it show?
Shows the relationship between sample size and risk ratios. Tends to converge to a point at the largest sample size = the true risk ratio. Any gaps lower down indication publication bias.
53
How should a critical appraisal for a systematic review be carried out? (x7 stages)
1. Clear, predefined question – PICOS. 2. Was a comprehensive search for relevant literature carried out? 3. Was methodological quality of each study assessed appropriately? 4. Was heterogeneity explored? 5. How credible is the evidence? 6. Check guidelines for reporting.
54
How should a critical appraisal for a meta-analysis be carried out?
1. Was heterogeneity explored? 2. Was publication bias an issue? 3. Was it appropriate to pool the studies? i.e. were they sufficiently homogenous? 4. Was the appropriate model used to pool effect estimates? Fixed versus random effects model. 5. Did different sub groups of studies give similar results? How generalisable are the findings?
55
What is morbidity?
The number of cases of ill health, complications and side effects attributed to a particular condition over a given period i.e. the condition of being diseased. RELIEF treatment can reduce morbidity.
56
What is the duration of a disease defined as?
Time from diagnosis to death/recovery. IMPORTANT - this differes from what others may think e.g. moment you get symptoms until pathogen presence in body is gone.