Cognitive Flashcards

(193 cards)

1
Q

Who is Wilhelm Wundt and what did he do?

A

The father of psychology - set up first psychology lab and used introspection to study thought
Decomposed thought into simpler components - emotion, perception, sensation
Structuralism
First attempt to study thought scientifically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is structuralism?

A

Studying the structure of thought - decomposing thoughts into simpler components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What approach did William James coin?

A

Functionalism
How do mental processes operate?
What are the characteristics of mental processes?
How do we control behaviour?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What approach did Watson and Skinner coin?

A

Behaviourism - react to limits of introspection
- Focuses on observable causes of behaviour - associations between stimuli and responses
- Applying psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What approach did Koffka and Kohler coin?

A

The Gestalt approach (reaction to structuralism)
- Human thought seen as whole - impossible to break into smaller bits without losing the essence of the thought
- Emphasises organised units in perception and behaviour that cannot be reduced to component parts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What approach did Freud, Adler and Jung coin?

A

Psychodynamic approach (reaction to behaviourism)
- Focus on unconcious motivations as causes of behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does the Information Processing Approach in early cognitive psychology propose?

A

Rekindled scientific interest in unobservable mental processes like attention and signal detection
(Indirect measure of cognitive processes)
New paradigm developed - people as active information processors, and cognition conceptualised as a series of information processing stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is cognitive neuroscience?

A

Integrating models and theories from the IP approach with advances in understanding brain systems
(Are cognitive theories biologically plausible?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did functionalism develop from and how did James implement it?

A

Developed from pragmatism in philosophy - to find the meaning of an idea, you have to look at its consequences.
This led James towards emphasis on cause and effect, prediction and control, observation of environment and behaviour.
Laid groundwork for behaviourism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is cognitive psychology?

A

Understanding the mental processes that allow us to make sense of our environment, and help us decide how to react to the environment and implement those decisions
Generate descriptions of how these mental processes function - typically a flow chart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is functionalism?

A

Draws a distinction between
- Structure of a mental state (neural activity), and
- Function of a mental state (the consequences of the mental state - e.g. behaviours or new mental states
Cognitive psychology is about developing a functional explanation of mental processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is type identity theory?

A

A mental state is equivalent to a specific pattern of neural events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is token identity theory?

A

A mental state maps onto a variety of different neural events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the two body/ two brains problem? (Searle, 1994)

A

Two people can have the same thought (‘mental state’) but must necessarily have different patterns of neural events (because all brains are different).
E.g. if I ask everyone “what is 4 x 4” the answer 16 pops into everyone’s heads. Thus, we all have the same mental state but different neural states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If cognition is the processing of signals, how do psychologists measure cognition by investigating signal processing? (3 measures)

A

Redundancy - how much signal is needed to detect and identify a stimulus
Reaction time - how long does it take to detect or identify a stimulus
Capacity - how many signals can be processed simultaneously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does measuring signal processing (redundancy, reaction time, capacity) allow psychologists to do?

A

Allows psychologists to operationalise and measure abstract concepts such as attention, memory, perception, planning, reasoning, motivation etc
- Measure cognition as how well signals are processed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the computational metaphor of the mind?

A

Input, processing, output
- Brains are like computer hardware, cognition (thought) is software (Searle, 1994)
- Sensory information transformed into internal representations which lead to actions
- Cognition refers to the processing of these internal representations
- Cognitive psychology is concerned with understanding the process, not the hardware
Assumption - mental software used for different processes is modular - programs can run independently of one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are Marr’s (1982) 3 Levels of Description?

A

1) Computational Theory level
2) Representation and algorithm level
3) Hardware level
(1 and 2 are of primary interest to cognitive psychologists)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is computational theory level? (Marr’s (1982) 3 Levels of Description)

A

Asks:
- What is the function of cognition and what different cognitive functions there are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is representation and algorithm level? (Marr’s (1982) 3 Levels of Description)

A

Asks:
How cognition works - how information is stored or internally represented and what operations algorithms are used to manipulate internal representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is hardware level?

A

Asks:
How the representations are instantiated in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is modularity? (Fodor, 1983)

A

Human cognition is organised into discrete mental modules, each of which fulfils a specific function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are horizontal faculties? (Modules)

A

General competencies used across domains
e.g. LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are vertical faculties?

A

Domain specific cognitive functions and processes
e.g. language production or object recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
What is information encapsulation?
Modules do not need to interact with other modules to operate successfully
25
Does disruption to a module affect processing in other modules?
Not necessarily e.g. damaging an object recognition module does not affect STM
26
What are characteristics of modules?
- Modules correspond to anatomically defined brain areas - Modules are similar across humans - Module processing is fast and obligatory (happens without conscious thought and cannot be suppressed)
27
What types of faculties (modules) does cognition involve?
Activation of horizontal and vertical faculties e.g. naming a face might draw on a visual module, memory faculty and linguistic module
28
What are input systems? (modularity)
- Process incoming sensory information - Transfer information to central processors - Domain specific (only process a particular class of information) Typically these are vertical faculties
29
What is a central processor? (modularity)
Makes decisions and plans actions (not modular)
30
What is an effector system? (Modularity)
These execute responses
31
What is dissociation?
A manipulation that affects one cognitive task but not a different task e.g. Spatial memory - saccades disrupt this (eye movements) Verbal memory - saccades do not disrupt - we know that verbal and spatial are different
32
What is a double dissociation?
Completing two tasks that must be controlled by different cognitive modules e.g. After doing task that affects spatial but not verbal, also do task that affects verbal but not spatial Spatial memory - articulative rehearsal has no effect Verbal memory - articulative rehearsal disrupts this Can conclude that they are separate modules
33
What is cognitive neuropsychology? What methods does it use?
Looks at what brain damage can tell us about normal cognition - Reverse engineering cognition - Localisation of functions less important - Typically investigate single cases Same idea as dissociations - lesions instead of interfering task Single dissociation: e.g. DF - cannot recognise objects, but can use them - shows ventral part of brain deals with object recognition Double dissociation: Patients with parietal cortex lesions - can recognise objects but cannot use them
34
What was discovered from patient HM? (Scoville and Milner, 1957)
Had neurosurgery to cure epilepsy - Could not form new memories (severe anterograde amnesia) - Short term memory OK, could learn new skills - Showed that LTM, STM and procedural memory must be different systems - Revolutionised understanding of how memory functions
35
What are limitations of cognitive neuropsychology?
Rarely know normal performance - how good a person was at a task before injury Does not account for functional reorganisation of cognition - patients could adopt compensatory strategies Can't say anything about time-course of information processing Damage is rarely focal (e.g. stroke affects large brain area)
36
What is attention?
Filters out irrelevant stimuli
37
What did William James conceive attention to be?
The taking possession of the mind of one out of several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought Focalisation, concentration of conciousness
38
What is focusing attention closely tied to?
Concious perceptual experiences
39
How much information can be carried through the optic nerve?
Up to 100 megabits (MB) per second
40
What parts of attention are studied?
Input - selection of relevant sensory information - what cognitive mechanisms? Central process - resource for switching between different tasks, concentration, active processing - once we have processed, how do we decide what action to take?
41
Is attention a module?
Better to conceive of it as an 'Attentional Network' of several different modules and processes that interact to guide behaviour
42
What is Posner and Peterson's (1990; 2012) Three Component Model of the attention system?
1) Alerting: a system that regulates arousal level to maintain optimal vigilance (central process) 2) Orienting: prioritising relevant sensory signals (input module) 3) Executive: the conscious control of behaviour (central process)
43
How can components of the attention system be double dissociated?
Hemispatial neglect - deficit of attention to right brain and left body - Orienting problems with no executive or alerting deficit Alien hand syndrome - commissurotomy and frontal lobe injury - no control over a hand - failure of executive network - Deficit of conscious control with no deficit of orienting or alerting
44
What is the 'cocktail party' effect? (Cherry, 1953)
How can people attend to one person while ignoring other conversations? Ignoring speech from most people to listen to one person talking
45
What is the shadowing paradigm/ dichotic listening task? (Cherry)
Different word lists played to left and right ear Participant must repeat words from one ear - Participants cannot recall words presented to unattended ear - fail to detect language changes or backwards words
46
What does the dichotic listening task show about attentional orienting?
It acts like a filter that prevents information in the unattended channel being processed
47
What is Broadbent's Filter Theory? (1958)
First information processing theory of attention - Information about physical properties (e.g. tone, pitch, loudness) of stimuli are processed pre-attentively - This information is used for channel selection: choosing which source of input to process - Attention module filters out irrelevant info - Attended information is processed and acted on - Information in the unattended channel is lost Sensory processing - Channels 1 and 2 Input modules: Attention module - Channel 1, channel 2 is stopped Central process: Channel 1 continues through to semantic processing and working memory
48
How does 'breakthrough' from unattended ear challenge Broadbent's filter theory? (Moray, 1959)
Not all unattended information is lost: “breakthrough” from unattended ear - when word in unattended ear makes sense in the context of the message in the attended ear The persons’ name occurs in the unattended ear (e.g. Moray 1959)
49
What is attenuation theory? (Triesman & Geffen, 1967)
Filter limits the amount of stimulus information that can be processed - Attended stimuli analysed in detail Processing attenuated in unattended channel, but not extinguished - Much less information available to identify the stimulus Breakthrough occurs when - Stimuli can be identified using limited information (e.g. a beep in spoken language) - Stimuli is consistent with ongoing tasks - Stimuli are very easily identified (e.g. own name) Channel 1 and 2 are processed all the way through, but more attention is payed to channel 1 after they both pass through the attenuating filter and carry on to semantic processing and working memory - Revision of Broadbent's filter theory
50
What is the spotlight metaphor of attention?
Spotlight a filter that moves through space (Posner 1980) Zoom-lens (Erikson & St. James 1986) - Spotlight is flexible - Wide focus, little detail - Tightly focused, lots of detail Generalising a filtering module from auditory to visual system
51
What is overt attention?
A movement of the eyes to fixate the location of interest
52
What is covert attention?
Orienting attention to a location that is not being fixated (no eye movement)
53
What is the spatial cueing task? (Posner, Snyder & Davidson, 1980)
Fixate the centre of the screen and a cue orients attention to one or other side Participant must respond as quickly as possible to the appearance of the target Usually 3 types of trial: Valid: Target appears at cued location Invalid: Target appears opposite cued location Neutral: Cue does not indicate any location Experiment 1: Cue is valid on 80% of trials, Experiment 2: Cue valid on 50% of trials (no incentive to attend to cued location) On experiment 1 people preferentially look at invalid cues on both central and peripheral cues On experiment 2 people look more at invalid than valid for peripheral cue, equal looking for central arrow cue - 80% valid - Shows that you can look at one thing and pay attention to something else - 50% valid - if arrow is informative then people do not use it - Peripheral cue - stronger response than central cue
54
What is the exogenous system for orienting spatial attention?
Orient to salient location - orienting of attention towards unexpected visual targets Involuntary Stimulus-driven Fast (Max effect @ 150ms) Transient Inferior Parietal Lobe & ventral frontal regions (right) Inhibitory after-effect
55
What is the endogenous system for orienting spatial attention?
Orient to task relevant location - orienting of attention towards visual targets Voluntary Goal-directed Slow (Max effect after 300ms) Sustained Superior Parietal Lobule, FEF (bilateral)
56
Which attention theory is consistent with exogenous and endogenous attention?
Consistent with attenuating filter theory that prioritises information at the attended location
57
What is feature integration theory? (FIT)
Integrates attention into information processing model of perception Paying attention - bind visual features together - this forms an object Input modules e.g. colour, shape, location, texture Visual representation Attentional spotlight leads to: Central processing - relates to memory (episodic, declarative, procedural) Output modules
58
What is the binding problem? Who explored this?
Visual processing splits objects into component features - Paying attention - bind visual features together - this forms an object - Target identified by single unique feature - tends to pop out, does not matter how many distractions there are - Conjunction - more difficult, affected by distractors How does the visual system know which ones belong together? Triesman & Gelade (1980) explored this using visual search tasks
59
What are visual search tasks? Triesman & Gelade (1980)
Find a target in a cluttered display Set size (the number of items) Target Type Target Present (Pos) Target Absent (Neg) Disjunction (feature) Conjunction
60
What are the two stages of processing of feature integration theory?
Preattentive, when objects defined by single, salient feature Attentive, when features need to be combined Attention acts like a ‘glue’ that binds features into objects
61
What are illusory conjuctions? (Triesman & Schmidt, 1982)
Participants identify numbers then identify shapes in briefly presented displays (200ms) Participants incorrectly report letter/colour combinations that are not present Paying attention to the peripheral would mean issues with binding the colour letter combinations in the middle Triesman argues this shows attention needed to bind features into objects
62
What is the capacity of the attentional filter?
Filter capacity limited to ~3-4 items
63
What studies back up the capacity of the attentional filter?
Change blindness: which object changes? One object changes after a black screen - hard to detect the change with six objects on screen - limited capacity filter For 3 items, less of a change blindness effect Multiple Object Tracking (Pylyshyn & Storm 1988) Monitor specific objects moving - usually limited to three or four objects of a group Participants can accurately (85% correct) track up to 5 objects
64
What number of locations can be attended to?
Some argue for multiple loci (up to~4) (Baldauf & Deubel 2010) Different filters for different effector systems? Other argue for a single, indivisible locus of attention (Jans, Peters & De Weerd., 2010)
65
What is early selection and who argued for this?
Early filter theories argue that attention module prevent the processing of irrelevant stimuli. Broadbent, Cherry & Treisman argued for early selection - Filtering occurs between perception and semantic processing - Unattended receive limited or no semantic processing
66
What evidence is there for early selection?
Broadbent (1958) argued that unfiltered stimuli are not processed at all! - Shadowing (Broadbent 1958):Very poor recall for information presented to unattended ear - Selective looking (Neisser & Becklen 1975) - Change blindness (Rensink et al. ,1997) - Inattentional Blindness (Mack & Rock 1998)
67
What is the attenuated filter? (Triesman, 1964) How did this change early selection theory?
Irrelevant information can pass through filter if capacity not filled by relevant information Depends on capcacity
68
What is the ball passing or hand slapping experiment?
Participant views video, has to count either how many ball passes or how many hand slaps Ppt shown overlapping streams but only attend to one Same thing happens but with an unexpected event Attention is focused in such a way that unexpected event is not realised
69
How are ERP studies consistent with early selection?
Magnitude of change is measured When attending to a stimulus and ignoring another one, the magnitude of ERP is smaller than when new stimulus is attended to Shows it is an intentionally selective mechanism
70
What are practical consequences of attention producing signal enhancement in visual cortex?
Attention enhances spatial resolution (Yeshurun & Carrasco 1998) Attended locations have higher perceived contrast (Carrasco, Ling & Reid 2004)
71
What neurophysiological evidence supports attention link with the visual cortex?
- Phosphene: An illusory visual experience triggered by stimulation of the visual cortex - Attention modulates the responses of early visual areas such as V1, V2, V4 and V5 - Attention lowers phosphene thresholds in visual cortex
72
How does attention affect our perception of light and dark?
- Perceive difference between light and dark as greater when they pay attention to it - Lower phosphene thresholds - more sensitive to changes
73
What did Deutsch and Deutsch (1963) propose?
That filtering occurred AFTER semantic processing Selection based on which items are consistent with the observers’ goals
74
How do Flanker Interference Effects provide evidence for late selection?
Identify direction of central chevrons/arrows (L/R) when the surrounding arrows are either pointing the same way or a different way Reaction times faster and fewer errors in congruent condition because of less interference
75
How does 'Blindsight' in patient PS provide evidence for late selection? (Halligan & Marshall, 1988)
PS has hemispatial neglect: inattention to left side of space PS - lesions to right brain She does not consciously perceive the flames when shown image of burning house (and reports the houses as identical) But, when asked to pick one to live in she picked the non-burning house of 9/11 trials!
76
What have electrophysiological studies of auditory attention shown? (Hillyard et al., 1973)
Participants attend to one ear, ignore the other Detect occasional probe stimuli in a stream of ‘standards’ (non-target sounds) - Big spike in ERP associated with early processing in attended ear - Also evidence for late processing - late perception (300ms after stimulus starts) Suggests attention can modulate both early and late processing
77
What is perceptual load theory?
Reconciling evidence for early and late selection: Perceptual load = How hard it is to process the perceptual features of a display Low load: all items in a display pass through the filter and get analysed Irrelevant items interfere with processing of relevant ones High load: only task relevant items pass through filter Irrelevant items cannot interfere with processing of relevant stimuli
78
Explain a ‘passive’ limited-capacity filter and an ‘active’ late selection process (Lavie 1995;2005, Lavie et al., 2004). What theory does this coincide with?
Early, passive, fixed capacity filter filters incoming signal before semantic processing Late, active, central resource used for selecting relevant stimuli after semantic processing Task: Attend to the central line, identify whether the probe is a Z or an X More letters in centre = higher perceptual load - People performed better when there was a higher perceptual load - filtering out of irrelevant stimuli
79
Do all items pass through semantic processing to the late filter when there is low perceptual load?
Yes, not with high perceptual load (just semantically processed)
80
What evidence is there that perceptual load modulates activity of early visual areas?
Low load= words in upper/lower case High load= how many syllables Irrelevant= motion field in background When motion stimulus starts during high load - no corresponding neural activity
81
What did Muggleton et al. (2008) find out about perceptual load using TMS?
Perform letter ID task TMS delivered over MT/V5 Higher intensity TMS required during high load Exp 2 no load condition Exp 3: TMS delivered 500ms after array onset When attention was payed, less TMS stimulation was required for a phospehene to be produced. Therefore, attention produces more electrical activity in MT/V5 and more phosphene intensity
82
How does perceptual load determine early or late selection?
Early perception - orienting module (high load) irrelevant items filtered out - no semantic processing of irrelevant items Late perception - executive decision making module (low load) everything passes through filter and is processed semantically
83
What is the central executive and what does it allow for?
An attentional control module A module that allows the conscious processing of information
84
What is the capacity of the central executive required for?
(Capacity is limited) 1) Reasoning and decision making (e.g. which stimulus should I react to?) 2) Planning (what actions are needed to achieve a goal) 3) Response selection (what action shall I take?) 4) Response inhibition (I want to inhibit a reflexive or habitual response) 5) Monitoring behaviour (Am I doing this task correctly?) 6) Switching between tasks Module provides resources to make sense of input Similar to Posner's idea of a central control
85
What do single resource theorists believe?
We have one pool of cognitive resources that has a limited capacity Used flexibly across tasks If demands of task exceed capacity, performance suffers This pool of resources is also known as ‘attention’ or the ‘central executive’ (e.g. in Baddeley & Hitch’s working memory model) This resource is only needed when we consciously control behaviour - Allocation policy - what we do with information - Enduring dispositions - what we like and do not like, long term goals - If you do not have the capacity to do the task -> arousal/anxiety - Flexible mechanism - Yerkes-Dobson - not enough or too much arousal is bad - Cognitive capacity only for conscious attention
86
What did Kahneman (1973) believe about the capacity of attention?
Attention is limited, but flexible Motivation and arousal increase cognitive resources
87
What do multiple resource theories propose?
The central executive is composed of sub-modules (e.g. Wickens 1984) Tasks that engage the same module compete with a module for the same resources Tasks engage distinct modules do not compete for resources Some resource needed to switch between tasks?
88
What is the Dual Task methodology?
Measure performance on Task A on its own Measure performance on Task B on its own Task A & B together: If they rely on the same resource, performance should be impaired Rub tummy and pat head
89
What factors affect Dual Task performance?
Similarity Practice Task Difficulty
90
How does similarity affect dual task performance?
How similar is the input (‘stimulus modality’) Read map while and scanning road for landmarks (both visual input) Listen to directions while scanning road for landmarks (auditory and visual inputs) How similar is the output (‘response modality’) Strum with right hand, fret with left hand (both manual responses) Answer a question while steering (Vocal and manual response) Performance is worse when tasks are similar!
91
What is automaticity?
Practiced task become automatic, and doesn’t require any attention - Habitual/reflexive - Automatic -> less conscious, less insight into operations necessary to generate a response Fast Do not disrupt other tasks (i.e. require no attention) Unconscious Reflexive (always occur when the appropriate stimulus is presented) Touch-typing? Knitting? An example of automaticity is when people drum their fingers while thinking
92
How does task difficulty affect dual task performance?
Harder tasks require more information processing: They require more ‘attention’ Answering easy questions while cruising on the motorway Answer a difficult question while steering along narrow winding country roads Giving a lecture while monitoring a chat feed May also require extra coordination Processing requirement more than the sum of the two tasks
93
How does practice affect dual task performance? (Support by Spelke et al. (1976))
The more a dual task is practiced, the better performance becomes Even on tasks that are similar! Spelke, Hirst & Neisser (1976) Taught 2 students to read stories and take dictation Initially had poor handwriting and reading speed 6 weeks of training 5 x 1 hour sessions for 17 weeks (!) Reading speed & comprehension increased to normal levels during dictation
94
Why does practice reduce interference?
People develop effective new strategies that minimise interference? Effectively interleave the different tasks Practice reduces the amount of cognitive resources the tasks need? i.e. they become easier Practice helps to differentiate between tasks? i.e. they become more different Practice reduces the number of different cognitive processes required? - Become less cognitively demanding - Reduce number - able to skip stages of cognition e.g. learning times tables
95
How did Shiffrin & Schneider (1977) distinguish between controlled and automatic processes?
Theoretical distinction between controlled and automatic processes Controlled Processes Require engagement of limited attentional resources Are conscious Can be used flexibly in changing circumstances Automatic Processes Have no capacity limit Do not require attention Hard to modify when learned (e.g. learning bad driving habits…) We can categorise voluntary attention as a controlled process, and reflexive attention an automatic process
96
What did Norman and Shallice (1986) find out about schemas?
Fully automatic processing controlled by schemas e.g. Writing your signature Cognitive computational model
97
What is contention scheduling? Norman & Shallice (1986)
Chooses between simultaneously active schema Biased by goals and desires but does not require attention
98
What is deliberate control by supervisory attention system? (SAS) (Normal & Shallice, 1986)
System for overriding automatically generated behaviours Generating novel responses Doing anything for the first time (e.g. learning to ski)
99
What evidence supports automatic processing?
Action slips: Unintentionally performed actions ‘Action Slips’ in healthy participants (e.g. Reason 1979, Jonsdottir et al., 2008)) Diary study of 35 neurotypical people reported 400 action slips Identified 5 main categories of action slips Typically action slips are habitual actions that occur when attention elsewhere (e.g. daydreaming, very tired)
100
What are the 5 main categories of action slips?
1) Storage failure: A previous action is forgotten or recalled incorrectly (refilling a cup that is already full) 2) Test failure: Failure to monitor an action, resulting in an unintended action occurring (taking the turn to work, not the shops) 3) Subroutine failure: correct actions occur in wrong sequence, or omitted (pour water into cup before the coffee granules) 4) Discrimination failure: selecting an inappropriate object for the task (pick up the wrong utensil) 5) Programme assembly failures: inappropriate combinations of actions (e.g. unwrapping a sweet, but putting the wrapper in your mouth and throwing the sweet away)
101
What do memory complaints following minor head injury or whiplash often bear similarity to?
Absent mindedness or action slips Weak positive correlation between action slips and scores on a memory failures questionnaire
102
What is instance theory? (Logan, 1988)
How does practice lead to automaticity? Each encounter with a stimulus produces a separate memory trace Repeated encounters (practice) produces a greater store of information about the stimulus and how to process it This increase in knowledge means retrieval of relevant information about the stimulus is fast Automaticity occurs when the stimulus directly triggers the retrieval of a past solution from memory In other cases the solution must be arrived using conscious strategies or heuristics.
103
What is mental imagery?
Internal representation that creates the experience of sense-perception in the absence of appropriate sensory input: Visual Auditory Kinaesthetic Proprioceptive Gustatory Olfactory
104
What does imagery being pictorial mean?
What is imagined is re-created in the mind as a picture
105
What is functional equivalence theory?
Functional Equivalence (e.g. Kosslyn 1980, Decety 1996) Imagery is generated using neural machinery used for sensation and motor control Visual imagery relies on visual system Motor imagery relies on motor system Activating parts of brain that have already seen the picture in order to imagine it Directly manipulating the mental image
106
What is aphantasia?
Do not have mental imagery
107
What is propositional codes theory?
Imagery is an epiphenomenal product of propositional codes Images are manipulated by manipulating symbolic representations, NOT the image itself (e.g. changing the code in a computer program) Imagery is independent of sensory and motor systems - Theory that mental imagery does not rely on the visual system - Use a mental code - Change underlying code that represents an object - manipulate x and y co-ordinates of image
108
What do Kosslyn and Pylyshyn have different views on?
Kosslyn argues imagery uses same machinery as perception, whereas Pylyshyn argues imagery and perception use fundamentally different mechanisms Analogy: in powerpoint I can drag and drop a shape using the mouse (manipulating a pictoral representation), or I can can specify shape, colour and location with numbers (manipulating propositions)
109
What behavioural evidence supports functional equivalence theory of mental imagery? (Pictoral)
- Mental rotation = pictoral - Mental scanning = further away target is, slower the response to say whether it was there or not, takes time to mentally move across this space (pictoral) Experiments demonstrated that more time is required to scan further distances across visual images, even when the same amount of material falls between the initial focus point and the target. Not only did times systematically increase with distance but subjectively larger images required more time to scan than did subjectively smaller ones. Finally, when subjects were not asked to base all judgments on examination of their images, the distance between an initial focus point and a target did not affect reaction times.
110
What cognitive neuroscience evidence supports functional equivalence theory of mental imagery? (Pictoral)
Imagery activates visual areas involved in perception (O’Craven & Kanwisher 2000) Activation depends on the task High resolution imagery tends to activate early visual areas E.g. comparing two gratings and deciding which has the thickest stripes Spatial judgements tend to activate more dorsal visual areas Nonspatial judgements that don’t require high-res comparisons (e.g. faces vs places) activates ventral areas TMS over primary visual cortex (V1) disrupts visual imagery (Kosslyn et al., 1999) - Brain imaging shows association with mental process, not causation - Left FG not in primary visual system - instead important for linking visual info to semantic info (could support propositional codes) Left FG injuries - associated with aphantasia
111
What neuropsychological evidence supports functional equivalence theory of mental imagery? (Pictoral)
MS (an achromatopsic patient) can’t imagine colours Imagine sky on a summers day, a policebox and the sea on a summers day Which blue is the darkest? Some patients with left-neglect & hemianopia (blindness on one side) can’t generate images (Bisiach & Luzzatti 1978) Making eye-movements reduces intensity of visual imagery (Andrade Kavanagh & Baddeley 1997; expt 4) Ask patient to recall traumatic event and make eye movements at same time - can process images without causing too much psychological distress
112
What is the problem of tacit knowledge? How does this support propositional codes theory?
Pylyshyn (1981) modified the mental scanning task P’s had to report compass bearing of other landmark Now RT unrelated to distance from starting point. Tacit knowledge used during task? Knowledge that is unconscious or that cannot be articulated P’s ask themselves “how would I do this in the real world” Simulate as many of the details as possible, including irrelevant ones! P’s perform the task in the same way as they would in the real world, even if they don’t have to! Change the instructions (i.e. the way in which the participant represents the problem) and you change the way the task is performed Imagery based on ‘propositional codes’? Non-visual symbolic representation (like a line of computer code that draws a square) Not telling people to scan the image - no correlation - Participants unconsciously include distance between points of image in their mental image as it would take longer for them to look to it in the real world - simulating irrelevant details of time taken to scan
113
How did patient DF support propositional codes theory?
DF - patient with visual agnosia - inability to discriminate between objects and patterns of different shapes, sizes, and orientations, however could still perform visual imagery tasks when the images were drawn from long term memory?
114
What is the problem of dissociations?
Double dissociations between imagery and visual problems: (Evidence for seperate modules) Some hemianopes have no problem with imagery (Bartolomeo 2002) JB has deficit of imagery but not visual perception (Sirigu & Duhamel 2001) ‘Congenital Aphantasia’: inability to generate images in otherwise neurotypical participants (e.g. Zeman, Dewar & Della Salla 2015)
115
What is the problem of individual differences?
Mental imagery ability varies across individuals (e.g. Zeman, Dewar & Della Salla 2015) Some neurotypical people are even ‘aphantasic’ Mental imagery (VVIQ score - Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire) declines with age (Gulyas et al., 2022) Neuropsychological studies tend to rely on older participants…
116
Is imagery a single, undifferentiated ability?
No - different types of imagery activate different brain areas
117
Does imagery use depictive or propositional representations?
May use both
118
What are the two functions and two levels of mental imagery? (Paivio, 1985)
Distinguishes between imagery content (what is being imagined) and imagery function (why it’s being imagined) Levels: specific and general Functions: cognitive and motivational
119
What is cognitive specific imagery?
Making spatial judgements Skill rehearsal Can mental imagery really be used to modulate behaviour? Yes Driskell, Copper & Moran (1994) Meta analysis of cognitive specific imagery to enhance skill Imagery effective, but not as effective as real practice (effect size of 0.261 vs 0.382) Experts benefit more from mental practice than beginners Effects of mental practice fade over time Is there an optimum amount of mental practice? Probably not: the more the better!
120
What is cognitive general imagery?
Developing strategies for play (e.g. visualising route) Case reports of athletes using general imagery Canoe Racers (MacIntyre & Moran, 1996) American Football (Fenker & Lambiotte, 1997) Wrestling (Rushall, 1988) Gymnastics (Mace et al. 1987; White & Hardy 1998)
121
What is motivational specific imagery?
Visualising the achievement of a specific goal Imagining winning or being praised for good performance Endorsed by many athletes (e.g. Moran 2008) “I have been visualizing myself every night for the past four years standing on the podium having the gold placed around my neck” Megan Quann (US gold meal winner) Novice golfers practice more (Martin & Hall, 1995) Imagery may be important for goal-setting (Munroe et al., 1999)
122
What is motivational general imagery?
Arousal: Visualise emotional aspects of a situation - Imagery can increase physiological arousal (Heart-rate: Heckor & Kaczor 1998) - Used for both increasing and controlling arousal (e.g. Hanin 1987) - Useful for limiting effects of anxiety e.g. Munroe et al., (2000), Vadocz, Hall & Moritz (1997) Mastery: Visualise effective coping strategies - Interventions tend to increase confidence - Badminton players report increased confidence (Callow, Hardy & Hall, 2001) - Improved self-efficacy (Feltz & Riessinger 1990) - Imagine feeling confident and in control on an endurance task - Reported higher levels of confidence and efficacy than controls - Fewer negative visualizations about performance
123
Is problem solving modular?
No
124
What are the three major characteristics of problem solving?
1) Goal directed 2) Requires cognitive processes (requires information processing) 3) Lack of relevant knowledge to produce an immediate solution Example: My boiler broke down last week. The pressure was too low. I needed to raise the pressure. So the problem is, how do I increase the pressure in the boiler? Why is this a problem? 1 I have a goal , 2 I need to think about how to achieve this goal, 3 I lack the relevant knowledge to immediately solve the problem
125
What is a well-defined problem?
All aspects of the problem are specified Assembling flat-pack furniture Escaping from a maze Solving arithmetic problems Most experiments use well defined problems
126
What is an ill defined problem?
Some aspects of the problem are unspecified How should I vote? How do I get a 1st class degree? Most real life problems are ill-defined!
127
What is a knowledge rich problem?
Specific prior knowledge is required writing a good psychology essay Solving a crossword
128
What is a knowledge lean problem?
Little prior knowledge is required Everything that is required to solve the problem is contained within it Solving Sudoku
129
What is reproductive thinking to solve a problem? (Gestalt approach)
Relies on experience to solve problem. A typical example of this is trial and error learning. This can be overt (actual tries) or covert (imagining what the consequences will be)
130
What is productive thinking to solve a problem? (Gestalt approach)
Coming up with new response or strategies for solving a problem. Requires re-structuring of the problem by mentally simulating possible solutions. Problem can be solved by engaging in mental simulation The problem must be restructured so that the solution suddenly becomes clear: An Insight
131
What is evidence for reproductive and productive thinking? (Apes)
Kohler (1925) Sultan the ape Has to get a banana from outside his cage Provided with two bamboo sticks that can be joined Accidentally pushed one stick into the other. This seemed to trigger an insight, as he immediately attempted to used the joined sticks to solve the problem. - Evidence of productive thinking Birch (1945) Apes raised in captivity can’t solve the task Sultan had experienced trial and error learning in the wild?
132
How is the Maier (1931) problem solved - how can you tie two strings together? (Pendulum problem)
Couple of minutes to think about this problem. Maier would brush past one of the strings after 10 minutes without a solution, then 10 minutes later offer the pliers. 39% solved without hints, 38 with hints (avg solution occuring 42 s after hint 1), 14 never reached ‘pendulum’ solution Gestaltists claim that this problem is very difficult to solve in trial-and-error fashion. Rather, participants must restructure the problem (i.e, understand the pliers can be used to make a pendulum) until a solution presents itself. Participants typically report ‘seeing’ the solution as a single insight. Swinging pendulum - when he brushed against rope and made it swing this caused a moment of insight
133
How is the Candle problem solved? (Duncker, 1945)
Melt candle, use wax to stick pin tray to the wall People think they cannot use the tray - see it as storage and not its use as a shelf - functional fixity
134
What is functional fixity? (Candle problem)
Failure to perceive new uses for old objects Participants who fail to solve problem often don’t remember the boxes!
135
What did Luchins (1942) find in the Water Jar study?
Studied effect of experience on problem solving Controlled the past experience ½ trained on complex 3-jar problems Rest given no training New problem with 2 jar solution 95% of no training group used 2 jars 64% of trained group FAILED to solve the problem!
136
What is a mental set (Einstellung) and how does this explain the water jar study?
Mental Set: A strategy is used to solve a problem even when it is inappropriate or inefficient Experience can make you worse!
137
What positive evaluation is there of the Gestalt approach to problem solving?
Introduced and investigated insight as a method of solving problems Emphasised restructuring and ‘representational change’ – very influential concept Showed that experience does not always help problem solving
138
What negative evaluation is there of the Gestalt approach to problem solving?
Focus on knowledge-lean, well specified problems Insight and restructuring very vague Describes what happens during problem solving, but not how it happens
139
What is the cognitive approach to problem solving?
Problem solving is conceptualised as a series of cognitive operations that transform information from one state to another Problem solving = changing the initial state into the goal state via a series of intermediate states (i.e. processing information) Each operation changes the state of the problem. Sometimes called ‘searching’ the problem space
140
What is problem space? (Cognitive approach)
Problem Space: Representation of a problem (Newell & Simon 1972) Initial State (a representation of the problem) All possible allowable operations to change the state of the problem All possible problem states between the initial state and the goal state Goal State
141
What is the computational approach to problem solving?
Newell & Simon (1972) developed a computer simulation of human problem solving: “General Problem Solver” Based on ‘think aloud’ paradigm, where participants verbalised their thought processes Retrospective interviews Designed to solve well defined problems Problems with a clear goal state
142
What are assumptions of the General Problem Solver? (Computational approach)
Information processing is serial We have limited short-term memory capacity Relevant information can be retrieved from LTM
143
How does Tower of Hanoi support the computational approach?
- Evidence of computational information processing - could program computer to solve this However, different programs needed for different problems - never able to derive general rules of problem solving
144
What are the 2 important heuristics (rules-of-thumb) for selecting operations (Newell & Simon)
Means-end analysis and hill climbing
145
What is means-end analysis? (Problem solving)
Identify difference between current state and goal Form a SUBGOAL that reduces this difference Perform operation that will attain subgoal e.g. following instructions to assemble IKEA furniture by making sub-components
146
What is hill climbing? (Problem solving)
Change current state to a state that more closely resembles the goal Used if you don’t really know how to solve the problem! e.g. assembling IKEA furniture WITHOUT instructions…
147
What are the three ways to change representation of problems?
Elaboration: Adding more information about the problem Constraint Relaxation: changing what is permissible to solve the problem e.g. use box containing pins, Re-encoding: changing how some aspect of the problem is interpreted See box as shelf, not container, scrambling letters in anagrams Similar to Gestalt theory, but more specific about how insight is achieved
148
How did Knoblich, Ohlsson et al., (1999) show the importance of constraint relaxation?
Task - move one stick to make the equation true (had to turn plus into minus) Change the values: Typical of arithmetic Change the operators: Not allowed in arithmetic
149
What do solvers tend to fixate operators prior to?
Insight occurring. Non-solvers did not. Eye-movements offer an alternative to ‘think aloud’ paradigm
150
What is positive evaluation of the computational approach?
Ideas of problem space and heuristic search appear critical to understanding problem solving Works well with well defined, knowledge poor problems Restructuring does appear to help with many insight problems
151
What is negative evaluation of the computational approach?
General Problem Solver may not always operate in the same way as humans Better at remember previous states Worse at planning future moves (only 1 at a time) Not a general theory of problem solving. Cannot account for phenomenological experience of insight May ultimately be specific to certain types of problem
152
What are creative people vs creative processes?
Creative people: Study of Individual Differences Is there something special about creative people ? Why are some people more creative than others? Creative processes: Cognitive Psychology What cognitive processes contribute to creativity? How can understand creative thought? Creativity is a form of problem solving
153
What is creativity?
Creativity a form of ill-defined problem solving Don’t really know what the goal is until you get there! Original or novel ideas do not have to be useful or worthwhile Creative ideas are both novel and useful or worthwhile e.g. Camera-phone, new form of artistic expression
154
What is creativity in the arts vs the sciences?
Creativity in the arts… Set a new style or movement, eg. Andy Warhol & Pop Art, Picasso & Cubism Notoriously difficult to evaluate ‘worth’ of artistic creations …and sciences New paradigm New invention which is useful New theory which explain more phenomena with same or fewer assumptions
155
Do creative thinkers reflect on their thought process?
Yes e.g. Hermann Helmholtz: Breaks and physical freshness helped him solve creative problems
156
What are the four stages of thinking described by Graham Wallas (1926)?
(Based on his own introspection and the reports of ‘great thinkers’) 1) Preparation Systematic, conscious, fruitless work on problem 2) Incubation Problem set aside for other work Unconscious work? Rest? Light exercise? 3) Illumination Solution to problem presents itself – a sudden insight 4) Verification Solution is developed and tested
157
Is incubation important in creative problem solving?
Smith & Blankenship (1991): Remote associates task What links wheel, electric and man? 57% of p’s given break solved problem, only 27% of non-break solved problem.
158
Why does incubation work?
Forgetting: Allows the ‘forgetting’ of unnecessary constraints or decay of mental sets (e.g. Simon 1966, Woodworth & Schlosberg 1954) Unconscious Work: representations related to problem are still active and interacting with LTM, but are not strong enough to reach awareness Spreading Activation: similar to unconscious work account
159
What is evaluation of introspective accounts of creative problem solving?
Useful framework for describing creativity Empirical support for concept of incubation Descriptive not explanatory Is illumination really a stage? Is there always insight?
160
What are the two types of creative processes? (Guildford, 1950)
Divergent and convergent thinking Use together for optimal problem solving
161
What is divergent thinking?
Fluency and novelty Search for new solutions, e.g. ‘Uses of a Brick’ test
162
What is convergent thinking?
Search for an ‘optimal’ solution Remote Associates Test (Mednick 1968) Anagrams & ‘Polygon’ word puzzles
163
What is the geneplore model of creative cognition? (Fink, 1990)
Creative thought has two stages: Generation Exploration
164
What is generation? (geneplore model of creative cognition)
Develop ‘preinventive forms’: ideas that don’t solve the problem, but that might be useful Forms are based on prior knowledge Divergent thinking
165
What is exploration? (geneplore model of creative cognition)
Using preinventive forms to try and solve problem Convergent thinking If no solution or idea is produced, cycle back to generation and start again
166
According to Finke, when were participants most creative in creating novel objects?
Participants were most creative when given category after creating forms Least creative when P’s chose category Concluded that pre-inventive forms facilitate creative thinking Bit like the restructuring - problem solving
167
How is the generation of new ideas constrained by existing knowledge? How does imaginary forms task support this? (Ward, 1994)
Rely heavily on existing knowledge to create new forms Often an unconscious constraint Ward (1994) Imaginary Forms task Draw creatures from another plant that’s nothing like earth (1 min) Animals structured like earth animals Bilateral symmetry Sensory receptors Manipulatory appendages
168
What is evaluation of the geneplore model of creative cognition?
Some empirical evidence that generation and exploration are important processes Deferring evaluation of forms does seem to increase novelty Does not describe processes involved in generating preinventive forms Focus is on originality, rather than creativity per se
169
How does brainstorming influence creativity? 2 main principles and 4 rules
Alex Osborn (1956) Increase idea production 2 main principles: Deferment of Judgement Quantity breeds Quality 4 rules: No criticism Free-wheeling is welcome (no constraints on ideas) Quantity is encouraged Everyone is free to combine and improve ideas
170
What is evidence supporting brainstorming?
Lots of positive results from the lab Meadow et al., (1959) Think of uses for a broom and a coat-hanger Ideas rated for uniqueness and usefulness. Good idea had to score on both Brainstorm group produced more good ideas than control group Brilhart & Jochem (1964) Investigated deferment of judgement Most creative when ideas produced 1st, then evaluated Similar to geneplore findings? However, not specific on HOW to generate ideas
171
What is morphological synthesis?
Allen (1962) Use a 2 or 3 dimensional matrix to represent different aspects of a problem New ideas found by combining 2 points in the matrix Ideas then evaluated Literally table with two axes - forming novel combinations
172
What evidence supports morphological synthesis?
Warren & Davis (1969) Compared 3 methods for generating ideas Short checklists of idea-spurring suggestions (e.g. add something, change colour) Long checklist of questions organised into categories Morphological Synthesis Morphological Synthesis produced the most ‘good’ ideas in the fastest time
173
What is decision making?
Decision Making: Choosing between various options What should I eat for dinner? What should I study? Which horse should I bet on? Who should I vote for? Decisions assessed relative to their consequences Typically measured in terms of gains and losses
174
What are risky vs riskless decisions?
Risky vs Riskless Risky: Which horse should I bet on? Riskless: Which chocolate should I eat?
175
What are single attribute vs multi attribute decisions?
Single: Buying wine when you know nothing about wine - just basing decision on price Multi - basing decision on lots of things - wine connoisseur
176
What are one-stage vs multiple-stage decisions?
One stage: buy cheapest wine Multiple stages: buying a house - where to live, how many bedrooms etc - takes a lot more individual decisions
177
What is the normative approach to rational decision making for single attribute, risky decisions?
“Normative” approach - Based on economic and philosophical models A rational decision maker will choose the option with greatest value Assumes 1) Full knowledge of all possible options, and the value of all outcomes 2) Infinitely sensitive to subtle differences in value 3) Decision makers are motivated to maximise value Led to development of Expected Value Theory
178
What is expected value theory?
Calculate the expected value of different decisions, choose most valuable decision Assumes - We know the relevant probabilities of the outcomes - We can assign a value to the outcome (e.g. monetary value, lower mortality, higher student ratings…) - Either decision is better than no decision Expected value = probability of outcome x value of the outcome EV based on outcome over a number of trials…
179
What is subjective expected utility theory? (SEU)
What if we don’t know probabilities? Use subjective estimate of probability This can be problematic: we’re not very good at estimating probability, particularly of rare but emotive events Utility: the subjective value we attach to an outcome Is the subjective value of cash always the same? Would a rich man cross the street to pick up a pound? Expected utility = probability of outcome x utility of outcome
180
What biases did Tversky and Kahneman identify in decision making?
Loss Aversion Risk Aversion Risk Seeking
181
What is loss aversion?
How big a prize would be needed for you to risk your £10 on the toss of a coin? Tversky & Kahneman: American UGs wanted at least $30! We are more sensitive to loss that would be predicted by SEU theory: Which would you prefer? 1) A certain prize of £800 2) 85% chance of £1000, but 15% chance of NOTHING Most people go for option 1, even though the utility is less!
182
What is risk seeking?
Which would you prefer? 1) A certain loss of £800 2) 85% chance of losing £1000, but 15% chance of losing NOTHING People pick option two even though utility is less - people take more risks to avoid losses
183
What is prospect theory? (utility function)
Utility (value we attach to the outcome) The utility of a gain is disproportionate to the disutility of a loss
184
What are framing effects?
Does the presentation of a problem affect our decisions? Imagine that the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows: Program A: 200 people will be saved. Program B: A one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved. Which of the two programs would you favour? Program C: 400 people will die Program D: A two-third probability that 600 people will die and a one-third probability that no people will die Which of the two programs would you favour? Expected values of programs are the same, but people prefer A and D: - Program A framed in terms of gains - encouraging loss aversion bias against B which risks that positive gain Program D - risk seeking bias to D
185
What is omission bias?
Anticipated regret is greater for own actions (as opposed to inactions) Ritov & Baron (1990): Your child has 10 chances in 10000 of dying from flu There is a vaccine that is certain to prevent flu BUT, it has potentially fatal side-effect What is the maximum death-rate from the vaccine you would be willing to tolerate? Average was 5 deaths per 10000 (i.e. less than the death rate of the disease!)
186
What is evaluation of expected utility theory?
Expected Utility theory delivers best, most ‘rational’ decisions However: Many of biases which are inconsistent with EUT Risk seeking Loss aversion Framing effects
187
What is evaluation of prospect theory?
Prospect Theory accounts for many biases in decision making However: We rarely make decisions based only on utility Can be difficult to evaluate the probability of many outcomes Doesn’t reflect the social, moral and emotional aspects of decision making Doesn’t account for individual differences in decision making What about more complex decisions?
188
What is Multi-Attribute Utility Theory [MAUT](Wright 1984) of complex decision making?
Identify all relevant attributes, give them a weighting, rate each attribute for all options, calculate utility for each option, pick option with maximum utility Gives ‘best’ outcome, but is time consuming, complex, and requires knowledge of what all the relevant attributes are e.g. picking uni
189
What is bounded rationality and satisficing (Simon, 1957) in complex decision making?
Decision making is as rational as possible, given situational and cognitive constraints (e.g. time, WM capacity) Satisficing: Identifying minimum requirements and selecting first option that meets them Gives good, but not optimal decisions Associated with better quality of life! (Schwartz et al., 2002)
190
What is elimination by aspects (Tversky, 1972) in complex decision making?
Consider each aspect in turn, selecting best options & eliminating others until only 1 remains May be used to reduce options to make MAUT more manageable
191
What is the social-functionalist approach to decision making?
Tetlock (2002): Need to understand the goals of the decision maker in order to evaluate decisions and understand biases. - We are motivated to justify our decisions to ourselves and others Expected Value approach assumes we are ‘intuitive economists’ - Try to maximise value We may adopt other roles: - Intuitive Politicians: Justify decisions to other people - Intuitive Theologians: Trying to protect ‘sacred values’ - Intuitive Prosecutors: Trying to prevent violations of ‘normal’ rules of society
192
You’ve just taken your 1st year exams. It’s the end of term, you’re tired and run down and you’re not sure if you passed. If you failed, you’ll have to resit at the end of the summer holidays. You have the chance to buy a very attractive 5-day vacation package to Barcelona at an exceptionally low price. This offer expires tomorrow, but your exam results will not be available until the following day. Would you 1) buy the holiday package 2) not buy the holiday 3) pay a £5 nonrefundable fee to retain the right to buy the package at the same low price the day after tomorrow (i.e. after you find out whether you passed your exam) What did participants say when they had the third option vs did not have the third option?
Couldn't justify decision to themselves in the don't know category, so most paid the £5 fee