Cognitive Flashcards

(8 cards)

1
Q

Introduction

A

EWT is when a person witnesses a legally important event and later recalls it to the court

Debate because EWT can be unreliable due to errors and biases

Significant: inaccurate testimony=impact on someone’s life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FOR:

Crimes are emotive experiences

A

Cahill - Found evidence hormones e.g. adrenaline enhance memory

Shocking experiences hold personal significance so remember

*Trial before jury = £17,000, so need to ensure reliable

Ethical issue: Moral responsibility = pressure for eye witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AGAINST:

Crimes are emotive experiences

A

May be emotionally traumatising

Defence mechanism to prevent memory from causing psychological harm

Freud - Distressing crime = Repression
protects + puts memory into unconscious

*However, Freud dream analysis research unreliable as unscientific

Ethical issue: Permissible to convict from a single EWT and no other evidence?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FOR:

Factors affecting EWT

A

Innocence Project -
Blind administration: officer administering lineup unaware of perpetrator
EWT reliable if rate confidence in EWT then cross examine with others’ EWT

*69% wrongful convictions due to EWT, so does this procedure actually work?

Social imp: How else could protect society if no other evidence apart from EWT?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AGAINST:

Factors affecting EWT

A

Wells et al - EWT prone to external factors affecting reliability e.g. influence of lineup administrator

Can give false confidence

*However, if too sceptical dangerous for society

Social imp: Over criminalisation of crimes due to race/gender
Black Americans 7x more likely to be wrongly convicted when victim = white

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FOR:

Post event information

A

Loftus - P’s remember purse was red in video of man stealing purse even though told it was brown

Key details less susceptible to be distorted by post event info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

AGAINST:

Post event information

A

Loftus + Palmer - Leading questions + smashed glass classic research

7% said saw broken headlight: “Did you see A broken headlight?”

17% said saw broken headlight: “Did you see THE broken headlight?”

*Reliable research as lab study + repeated measures

Post event info can distort EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conclusion

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly