Cohabitaion Flashcards

1
Q

Advising Cohabitees:

A

Solicitors may need to advise on the following:
▪Property ownership and occupation of the home.
▪Maintenance – parties and children.
▪ Children Act 1989.
▪Personal protection from domestic abuse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Home - Legal ownership by both cohabitees

A
  • Legal title – joint names or sole name?
  • Check the title deeds
  • Beneficial interest? – Joint tenancy
    – Tenants in common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Joint Tenancy

A
  • Parties equally own all of the equity.

Advice to client:
* Sever the joint tenancy?
* Alter will?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tenants in common

A
  • Parties own defined shares in the equity.
  • Is there a trust deed?
  • If not, interest determined by contributions to the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

No declaration of beneficial interest? Case Law

A
  • Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17

Starting point:
- 1 legal owner = 100% equity
- Joint legal owners = 50% equity each
Court considers:
- In which way did the parties intend their beneficial interest to be different from their legal interest?
- Whole course of dealing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

No declaration of beneficial interest? Case Law

A
  • Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53
  • Joint legal owners – joint tenants in equity
  • Rebut presumption using evidence of “common intention”
  • Conduct and dealings between parties?
  • What is fair considering the whole course of dealings?
  • Financial contributions and other factors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The Home - Legal ownership by one party

A
  • A beneficial interest in the property?
  • Trusts
  • EXPRESS
  • RESULTING
  • CONSTRUCTIVE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Express Trust

A
  • Written trust instrument
  • S.53(1) LPA 1925
  • In writing
  • Signed by the parties.
  • Conclusive evidence of the trust and beneficial interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Resulting trust

A
  • Direct contributions to purchase price - Evidence?
  • Court infers common intention to share
  • Since Stack v Dowden, resulting trusts are rarely applicable in cohabitation cases involving the family home
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Constructive Trusts

A
  • Express / Inferred common intention to share property

and

  • Action by non-legal owner in reliance.
  • Direct contributions e.g to mortgage
  • Indirect contributions e.g. improvements to property.

OXLEY V HISCOCK [2004] EWCA Civ 546

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Practical considerations

A

Establish the trust

Right of Occupation? s.12 (1) TLATA 1996

Application for declaration of interest in the property

s.14 TLATA 1996
s. 15 TLTA 1996

Register interest in property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Occupation of the home- no Legal or beneficial interest

A
  • Contractual licence
    – Need elements of a contract – May be terminable by notice
  • Equitable estoppel
    – Assurance of right to occupy – Reliance on that assurance – Detriment suffered as result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Financial Provisions - between the parties

A
  • No obligation to maintain each other
  • Can agree voluntary payments in separation agreement enforceable as a contract
  • If no agreement apply for state benefits
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Financial Provision - for children

A
  • Absolute obligation to maintain children
  • Application to Child Maintenance Service
  • Application to court pursuant to s.15 and schedule 1 Children Act 1989
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

schedule 1 / s15 children act1989

A
  • Orders the court can make:
    – Lump sums;
    – Periodical payments; and/or – Property adjustment.
  • Court has regard to factors in schedule 1 paragraph 4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Schedule 1 / s15 CA1989

A

Re P (Child: Financial Provision) [2003] FLR 865
* Court’s approach as to what is reasonable?
- Decide the home for the child.
- Decide if a lump sum is required.
- Decide maintenance allowance and
possibly a carer’s allowance.
Meet genuine “needs” of the child generously

17
Q

CA 1989

A
  • Unmarried mothers have parental responsibility (‘PR’)
  • Unmarried fathers do not have automatic PR – apply for PR under s. 4 Children Act 1989
  • PRorlackofitdoesnotaffectobligationto maintain a child financially.
18
Q

Personal Protection -Family Law Act 1996

A
  • Non-molestation order
  • Occupation orders

– s36 - applicant not entitled to occupy – s38 - neither party entitled to occupy

  • Non-molestation orders - s. 42
  • The police – criminal proceedings