colsson Flashcards

1
Q

what is Carlssons’ study

A
  • a literature review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 3 aims of carlsson’s study

A

1- provide more of an explanation for.schizophrenia than just the dopamine hypothesis
2- look at the relationship between neurotransmitter levels of dopamine and glutamate on the symptoms of schizophrenia
3- review anti-psychotic drugs that could be more effective with fewer side effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how many studies did Carlsson use in his literature review

A
  • 33
  • 32 published
  • 1 unpublished
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what 4 different types of studies were used

A
  • previous research using rodents to test NT functioning and related brain structure
  • studies with acute schizophrenia and schizophrenia in remission
  • studies using PET scanning methodology
  • evidence from studies looking at mice and their behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Carlsson used a variety of previously conducted research investigating neurotransmitter levels in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia
true or false

A
  • false
  • neurochemical levels
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what drugs known to induce symptoms of psychosis did Carlsson use

A
  • angel dust (PCP)
  • amphetamine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Carlsson used Laurelle et al in his literature review
what did Laurelle et al (1996) found

A
  • used SPECT and PET studies to measure the release of dopamine in the basal ganglia
  • found that amphetamine enhanced dopamine significantly in the basal ganglia in drug-naive patients
  • correlates with positive symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Carlsson used miller and abercrombie in his literature review
what did miller and abercrombie (1996) find

A
  • a slight release of dopamine studied by microdialysis was obeserved in rats following treatment with MK-801
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Carlsson used Lindstrom in his literature review
what did Lindstrom et al (1997) find

A
  • found deviant from normal levels of dopamine in pre-frontal cortex and straitum in drug-naive schizophrenic patients following administration of radiolabelled dopa or flurodopa
  • measured by PET scans
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did carlsson look into in terms of glutamate and schizophrenia

A
  • PCP blocks glutamate receptors (NMDA)
  • PCP is an antagonist (decreases effect of neurotransmitter)
  • deficiency of glutamate lead to cognitive disturbances e.g. poverty of speech, negative symptoms
  • glutamate deficiency in the cerebral cortex leads to negative symptoms
  • glutamate deficiency in the basal ganglia leads to positive symptoms
  • use of PCP is more likely to result in psychosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what did carlsson look into in terms of glutamate and dopamine

A
  • glutamate regulates dopamine it either acts as an accelerator or a break
  • it acts as an accelerator if dopamine levels are too low it increases the levels by exiting release
  • if glutamate isn’t working properly dopamine levels stay too low
  • which may lead to low levels of dopamine in the meso-cortical pathway which would result in negative symptoms
  • other way around for glutamate acting as a break
  • high levels of dopamine in the meso-limbic pathway would result in positive symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Carlsson look into in terms of drug therapy

A
  • some people respond drug treatment differently e.g. because some may have abnormal levels of glutamate and some dopamine
  • those who FGA didn’t work may have a more glutamate focused condition
  • Clozapine which regulates dopamine and serotonin
  • if serotonin is inhibited so is glutamate
  • an increase in serotonin causes an increase in glutamate which reduces negative symptoms and positive symptoms if levels are reduced in the basal ganglia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 3 overall findings of Carlsson

A
  • excess dopamine as an explanation was too simplistic
  • dopamine isn’t the only neurotransmitter to affect symptoms of schizophrenia e.g. GABA and glutamate
  • dopamine is just easier to study in the brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did carlsson conclude

A
  • schizophrenia may have different types that could be caused by abnormal levels of different neurotransmitters
  • further research is needed in developing drugs that avoid negative side effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why does Carlsson have low generalisability

A
  • uses studies that use animal studies
  • e.g. Miller and abercrombie used rats to look at the relationship between dopamine and glutamate
  • humans have a more developed PFC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why may Laurelle et al give Carlsson’s study high reliability

A
  • uses PET scans to measure the release of dopamine in the basal ganglia
17
Q

why does Carlsson’s use of secondary data improve the reliability

A
  • consistent findings e.g.
  • laurelle found elevation of dopamine in the basal ganglia leads to positive symptoms which is consistent into the findings into dopamine e.g. brier
18
Q

what is the practical application of Carlsson

A
  • several neurotransmitters are implicated in schizophrenia e.g. glutamate and serotonin
  • can develop more effective treatments for those resistant to FGA
19
Q

how does Lindstrom increase the validity of carlsson

A
  • use of PET scans to look at dopamine turnover in the brain
  • objective data
20
Q

how can secondary data be seen to produce low validity

A
  • 33 existing studies
  • 32 published
  • 1 unpublished
  • unknown methodology studies e.g. no control over EVs
21
Q

what are 2 ways carlsson’s study is ethically sound

A
  • aim to improve treatments
  • research was already in the public domain so no individuals were harmed