Commercial Law Flashcards
(211 cards)
To what does Article 2 apply?
Unless the context otherwise requires, Article 2 applies to the sale of goods. A “sale” consists in the passing of title from the seller to the buyer for a price.
Goods are all things that are tangible and movable at the time of identification to the contract; but not: (a) money in the sense of price to be paid, (b) investment securities, or (c) things in action.
- A “thing in action” is a personal right not reduced to possession, but recoverable by a suit at law.
- For example, Article 2 does not apply to an insurance policy because it is a thing in action.
When does title pass?
(1) Title cannot pass if the goods are not identified to the contract.
* Goods are identified to a contract if you can point to them and say “those are the goods being sold here.”
(2) Title passes when the seller delivers the goods.
- If the contract only requires seller to ship goods (not deliver them), title passes when the seller ships them.
- If the contract requires delivery at a destination, title passes on tender of the goods there.
(3) If sale is to occur without moving the goods,
- If the seller is to deliver a document of title, title passes upon delivery of the document of title.
- If at the time of contracting the goods are identified and no documents are to be delivered, title passes at time of contracting.
Does Article 2 apply to realty?
No, realty is not movable.
But, Article 2 applies if a structure on the realty is to be severed by the seller and is sold separately from the realty.
Does Article 2 apply to the sale of standing timber? The sale of crops?
Yes. A contract for the sale apart from the land of growing crops or other things attached to realty and capable of severance without material harm thereto, or of timber to be cut is a contract for the sale of goods whether the subject matter is to be severed by the buyer or by the seller.
Predominant Purpose Test v. Gravamen Test
Under the predominant purpose test, the court looks at four factors:
- (1) the language of the contract;
- (2) the nature of the business of the supplier of goods and services;
- (3) the reason the parties entered into the contract, and
- (4) the amounts paid for the rendition of the services and goods, respectively.
Under the gravamen test, where the gravamen of a lawsuit concerns the sale of goods, the UCC applies. Where it concerns the sale of non-goods, the common law applies.
- The gravamen test has found less acceptance than the predominant purpose test.
What is a merchant?
A merchant is a person:
- (a) who deals in goods of the kind;
- (b) who otherwise by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skill peculiar to the practices or goods involved in the transaction; or
- (c) to whom such knowledge or skill may be attributed by his employment of an agent or broker or other intermediary who by his occupation holds himself out as having such knowledge or skill.
Article 2 Contract Formation
Under Article 2, a contract for sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract.
Since Article 2 does not give us a clear rule for when a contract for the sale of goods has been formed, we use the common law definition for formation.
A common law contract is formed if there is offer, acceptance, and consideration.
- Offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.
- Acceptance is a manifestation of assent to the terms thereof made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer.
-
Consideration has two parts: bargain in exchange and legal value.
- In a bargain in exchange, I give something to you to induce you to give me something. (And, of course you do the same to me.)
- Legal value means that the thing exchanged is the kind of thing the courts find to have sufficient value to support a contract.
What are the two different ways to accept a contract under Article 2? What if the goods are non-conforming?
There are two ways to encounter acceptance in Article 2:
- Sometimes we see acceptance as acceptance of an offer (part of contract formation). To accept an offer, a party can either:
- (a) ship the goods (whether conforming or non-conforming), or
- (b) make a prompt promise to ship the goods.
- At other times we see acceptance of goods (e.g., they are tendered to you and you take them).
Non-conforming goods:
- A shipment of non-conforming goods does not constitute an acceptance if the seller seasonably notifies the buyer that the shipment is offered only as an accommodation to the buyer.
Merchant’s Firm Offer Rule
If an offer is made by a merchant to buy or sell goods in a signed writing which gives assurance that it will be held open, then it is not revocable for the time stated even if there was no consideration for the offer. If the terms of assurance are on a form supplied by the offeree, then the form must be signed by the offeror.
If no time is stated, then it will be held open for a reasonable amount of time.
Article 2 Battle of the Forms Step 1
A battle of the forms problem arises when there is an offer and acceptance that do not have the same terms and we are attempting to determine what the terms of the actual contract would be. Section 2-207, which deals with these problems, gives us three parts.
The first section tells us that if there is (a) a definite and seasonable expression of acceptance or (b) written confirmation sent within a reasonable amount of time, then there is an acceptance even when the terms of the acceptance vary from the terms of the offer, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to the additional or different terms.
Article 2 Battle of the Forms Step 2
If there is an acceptance under the first section, the second section tells us what the terms are:
- (a) The additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Without express acceptance of the term, it does not become part of the agreement.
- (b) Between merchants, such terms become part of the contract unless:
- (a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer;
- (b) they materially alter it; or
- (c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
A clause materially alters the contract if it would result in unreasonable surprise or hardship for the buyer. Some examples:
- (i) a clause negating such standard warranties as that of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose in circumstances in which either warranty normally attaches;
- (ii) a clause reserving to the seller the power to cancel upon the buyer’s failure to meet any invoice when due;
- (iii) a clause requiring that complaints be made in a time materially shorter than customary or reasonable.
Article 2 Battle of the Forms Step 3
The third section tells us that conduct of the parties can create a contract when the writing doesn’t, and it tells us what the terms are in such a circumstance:
- (i) Conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of a contract is sufficient to establish a contract for sale although the writings of the parties do not otherwise establish a contract. In such case the terms of the contract are those terms on which the writings of the parties agree, together with any supplementary terms incorporated under any other provisions of Article 2.
- (ii) It is not clear from the language of 2-207(2) what to do with different terms. Courts have developed two rules that are used in these circumstances:
- (a) The majority view adopts the “knockout rule” in these circumstances: terms of the contract include those upon which the parties agree, and gap fillers provided by Article 2. Different terms are knocked out of the agreement.
- (b) There are two minority views, both of which state that the offeror’s terms control, either because conflicting terms constitute material alterations, or because conflicting terms are outside the scope of 2-208(2) and thus are never considered.
Note: Although lawyers often take (3) to apply to oral contracts under the UCC, it appears to limit itself to written contracts.
Article 2 Statute of Frauds
The UCC statute of frauds applies to contracts for the sale of goods for $500 or more. A writing satisfies the statute of frauds if:
- (1) it provides evidence a contract for sale has been made;
- (2) it lists a quantity; and
- (3) it is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.
Note: A writing is not insufficient if it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon. But the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods stated in the writing.
The UCC statute of frauds is a bar to enforcement of a contract: it does not determine whether a contract exists, only prevents enforcement.
Merchant’s Written Confirmation Exception (Statute of Frauds)
Between merchants, if within a reasonable time a writing in confirmation of the contract and sufficient against the sender is received and the party receiving it has reason to know its contents, it satisfies the statute of frauds against such party, unless written notice of objection to its contents is given within 10 days after it is received.
- The writing is sufficient if it would meet the requirements of the statute of frauds with respect to that party.
- What is a reasonable time for taking any action depends on the nature, purpose and circumstances of such action. Course of dealings, usage of trade, or course of performance are material in determining a reasonable time.
Specially Manufactured Goods Exception (Statute of Frauds)
A contract which does not satisfy the statute of frauds but which is valid in other respects is enforceable if the goods are to be specially manufactured for the buyer and are not suitable for sale to others in the ordinary course of the seller’s business and the seller, before notice of repudiation is received and under circumstances which reasonably indicate that the goods are for the buyer, has made either a substantial beginning of their manufacture or commitments for their procurement.
Admission Exception (Statute of Frauds)
A contract which does not satisfy the statute of frauds but which is valid in other respects is enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought admits in his pleading, testimony or otherwise in court that a contract for sale was made; but the contract is not enforceable under this provision beyond the quantity of goods admitted.
Partial Performance Exception (Statute of Frauds)
A contract which does not satisfy the statute of frauds but which is valid in other respects is enforceable with respect to goods for which payment has been made and accepted or which have been received and accepted.
- Receipt and acceptance either of goods or of the price constitutes an unambiguous overt admission by both parties that a contract actually exists.
- Part performance by the buyer requires the delivery of something by him that is accepted by the seller as such performance. Thus, part payment may be made by money or check, accepted by the seller. If the agreed price consists of goods or services, then they must also have been delivered and accepted.
Article 2 Parol Evidence Rule
(1) There is some writing
(2) In which the parties set out terms
(3) Those terms were intended as final
* There may be terms that are not included or that are included but not final
(4) Then the final terms can’t be contradicted by
- (a) Prior agreements
- (b) Contemporaneous oral agreements
(5) But they can be explained or supplemented by
- (a) Course of performance
- (b) Course of dealing
- (c) Usage of trade
- (d) Evidence of consistent additional terms
- Unless the court concludes that the writing was a complete and exclusive description of the contract
What is a “course of performance”?
A “course of performance” is a sequence of conduct between the parties to a particular transaction that exists if:
- (1) the agreement of the parties with respect to the transaction involves repeated occasions for performance by a party; and
- (2) the other party, with knowledge of the nature of the performance and opportunity for objection to it, accepts the performance or acquiesces in it without objection.
What is a “course of dealing”?
A “course of dealing” is a sequence of conduct concerning previous transactions between the parties to a particular transaction that is fairly to be regarded as establishing a common basis of understanding for interpreting their expressions and other conduct.
What is “usage of trade”?
A “usage of trade” is any practice or method of dealing having such regularity of observance in a place, vocation, or trade as to justify an expectation that it will be observed with respect to the transaction in question. The existence and scope of such a usage must be proved as facts. If it is established that such a usage is embodied in a trade code or similar record, the interpretation of the record is a question of law.
If you have evidence you want to introduce of course of performance and course of dealing and usage of trade, and those types of evidence appear to contradict each other, which has precedence over the others?
The express terms of an agreement and any applicable course of performance, course of dealing, or usage of trade must be construed whenever reasonable as consistent with each other. If such a construction is unreasonable, the priority is as follows:
- (1) express terms,
- (2) course of performance,
- (3) course of dealing,
- (4) usage of trade.
In a contract subject to Article 2, may course of dealings and usage of trade evidence be introduced if that evidence contradicts an express term of the contract? What if the contract contains a merger clause?
Yes. If there is evidence of course of performance, course of dealings, or usage of trade, the evidence will be admitted even if the terms are not ambiguous, the terms seem to expressly contradict the evidence, and if there is a merger clause.
Article 2 Unconscionability
Look at the following for determining if unconscionability was present:
- (1) Use the context of the general commercial background and the commercial needs of the particular trade or case,
- (2) Look to see if the clauses involved are so one-sided as to be unconscionable under the circumstances existing at the time of the making of the contract.
- (3) Avoid oppression and unfair surprise.
In sum, a clause is unconscionable if it is too one-sided and is therefore oppressive or its inclusion creates “unfair” surprise.
If the court finds that the contract or any clause of it was unconscionable at the time it was made, the court may (a) refuse to enforce the contract, (b) enforce the remainder of the contract without the unconscionable clause, or (c) it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result.








