Community Property Flashcards
CP Presumption
California (CA) is a community property (CP) state. There is a community presumption, meaning that all property acquired during marriage is CP by the labor or earnings of either spouse. There are areas of separate property (SP): (1) property acquired before or after marriage, (2) property acquired during marriage by either spouse through gift, will, bequest, devise, or inheritance, (3) Property acquired from SP funds, and (4) profits, rents, and issue of SP. The burden is on the spouse opposing CP to defeat the CP presumption. Courts use the source rule to determine the character of property by tracing the source of funds used to acquire the property.
Martital economic community
begins at marriage and ends at death of either spouse, divorce, or with the intent of either spouse to not resume the marital relationship coupled with conduct indicating that intent. If spouses maintain the facade of marriage the MEC has not ended. Prior to 2017, a valid separation ending the community also required that the spouses lived separate and apart. However, this requirement is no longer necessary
Generally on divorce CP is divided
equally in kind, meaning on a per-item basis unless a special rule requires deviation via a writing or stipulation by the court
Pension is determined by the
time rule
time rule
Courts consider the amount of time the spouse worked during marriage to get the pension divided by the amount of time total the spouse worked to get the pension.
EX: As such, if it takes 20 years to vest, and the marriage was for 10 years during the vesting period, the community property is 50%. Since community property is 50%/50%, the other spouse gets 25%.
what is the rationale of the time rule
spouse’s labor during marriage is CP and any funding earned from spouse’s labor is CP.
transmutation agreement
An agreement between spouses during marriage to change the character of an asset. No consideration is required, but this change must be in writing, signed and consented by the spouse adversely affected, and must expressly declare a change in ownership.
Exception to writting requirement for transmutation
gifts that are not substantial in value, used in the home, tangible personal articles
When property is acquired in joint and equal form, there is a presumption that the property is
CP and if any SP was used to purchase the property is subject to
Lucas and Antilucas
Antilucas
- Jointly titled property acquired by a married couple (from 1987 to present) is presumptively community property at divorce, but any separate property used for the purchase is entitled to reimbursement of fair market value at the time of purchase.
Before 1987 Lucas rule
Lucas Rule - separate property was presumed to be a gift to community property and not reimbursable. At death, separate property used to acquire jointly titled property is presumed to be a gift unless otherwise agreed.
Lucas
Any SP used to purchase the
property was presumed to be gift and there was no right to reimbursement (unless there
was an agreement).
When CP funds are used towards SP property, the character of the property does not
change. Rather, the community gets
pro rata ownership share in the property.
Courts use the principal debt reduction method to discern the community’s ownership share in the
property. The community is entitled to the amount it
expended to feather the nest of CP and the pro rata increase
with regards to the loan, what affects CP
If the lender looks to SP as security, the mortgage is likely SP.
However, if the lender looks to the spouse’s standing in the community or CP property as
security, the loan is likely CP.
When there is CP and SP (Commingled funds) the burdent is
is on the spouse claiming that property acquired with funds from that account is SP to show that SP funds were used to acquire the property.
How do you satisfy the burden for commingled funds
Direct-indirect out methood
Exhasuation rule
Under the direct-in-direct-out rule the spouse claiming SP must
show
that there were sufficient SP funds in the account and that the spouse had the intent
to purchase the asset with SP funds
Exhaustion rule
the spouse
claiming SP must show that all the CP funds were used in the account and all that was left
in the account was SP.
family expense presumption for specific types of expenditures
expenditures for community
items, such as living, rent, food, etc. are presumptively made from CP
how to defeat the family expense presumption
there are not adequate records and commingling occurs, it is presumed the SP funds used
for family expenses are a gift to the community
What fiducary duties are placed on spouses
good faith and fair dealing and neither should take any unfair advantage over the other
Fiducary duty as a spouse is breached when
breached with intentional, grossly negligent or reckless dissipation of property, or a gain in financial advantage at the expense of the other.
. With regards to PI settlement awards, if
the cause of action arose during the MEC, the settlement award is CP, UNLESS the
settlement award is from the other spouse when the other spouse is the tortfeasor in order for them not to benefit too