Community Property Flashcards
(45 cards)
General Presumption
CA is a CP state. All property acquired during marriage is presumed CP. All property acquired before marriage or after legal separation is presumed to be SP. In addition, any property acquired by gift, will, or inheritance, or acquired during marriage from SP funds, is presumed to be SP.
General Presumption - Characterization
The characterization of an asset as either CP or SP depends on three factors: 1) the source of the assets, 2) any statutory characterization presumptions that may apply to the asset, and 3) any actions by the parties that may have altered the character of the asset. A mere change in form of an asset does not change its characterization.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Jointly Title w/SP
Title held jointly is presumed to be CP when it lists both spouse names. However, if both SP and CP were used to purchase title, the characterization of the assets could be altered at death or divorce.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Jointly Title w/SP - Lucas
At death, the property is presumptively CP regardless of the source of the purchase funds. However, the presumption can be overcome by evidence of an agreement to the contrary.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Jointly Title w/SP - Anti-Lucas Post 1984
At divorce, the spouse who made SP contributions to the CP is entitled to reimbursement without interest for 1) down payments 2) improvements 3) principal payments on a mortgage made with SP. Here,
Tracing Mixed CP/SP -Married Woman’s Presumption
Prior to 1975, if a woman took property in her name alone it created a rebuttable presumption the property is the wife’s SP. Property taken only in the name of the husband does not change the character of the property as CP. However, if there is evidence that the W intended that the property be a gift solely to the the H, then it would be held by H as SP. Here,
Tracing Mixed CP/SP -ProRata Rule: CP funds to pay down SP
When property is acquired prior to marriage, but uses CP funds to pay off the mortgage, the Moore formula is used to determine a pro-rata portion of SP and CP used to pay down the principal. The portion is measured by principal debt reduction, not mortgage interest, taxes, or insurance.
Here, the CP paid ____ toward the purchase price of ______. Therefore, the property is ____/____ CP and _____/_____ SP.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Reimbursement Rule: CP funds to improve SP
When CP is used to improve SP, the CP does NOT obtain a pro-rata ownership interest in the asset, but may be entitled to reimbursement. When a spouse uses CP to benefit the SP of the other spouse a gift is presumed. When a spouse uses CP to benefit the spouse’s own SP, the CP it entitled to reimbursement of the cost of the improvement or the increase in the value of the SP, whichever is greater.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Commingled Account
Placing SP funds in a joint account does NOT automatically change the SP to CP. But, the burden of proof is on the spouse claiming SP to trace each asset to a SP source. Family expenses (food, housing, clothing) are presumed to be made with CP funds even if SP funds are available.
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Commingled Account - Tracing
There are two methods used to trace funds in a commingled account: Exhaustion and Direct. Under the Exhaustion method, H could show that the CP funds in the account had already been exhausted from the account when he put his SP in the account. Under the Direct method, H must show the funds were “quick in quick out”, meaning there was sufficient separate funds available at all times and that he intended to use SP funds to buy the asset. Here,
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Business as SP enhanced by Community Labor
When community labor is used to enhance the value of a SP business, the community is entitled to a share of the increased value of the SP. Both Periera and Van Camp formulas are used to calculate the community’s interest and courts will apply whichever will yield the most fair result. Here,
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Business as SP enhanced by Community Labor - Pereira
The Pereira accounting method is used when the increase in value of a business is due primarily to the managing spouses labor. The SP investment is given a reasonable rate of return (10%) and the remainder is deemed community property. Here, if Pereira accounting were used…
Tracing Mixed CP/SP - Business as SP enhanced by Community Labor - Van Camp
The Van Camp accounting method is used when the increase in value of a business is due primarily to the unique nature of the SP asset or external circumstances beyond the spouse’s labor. The community will receive a reasonable salary for the spouse’s labor multiplied by the years of the marriage and subtract any salary already received. The remainder of the interest in the business will be then owned as the spouse’s SP. Here, if Van Camp accounting were used…
Special Characterization Presumptions:
personal disability retirement severs options for good education in life
Personal Injury Award
PI awards and settlements are CP if the cause of action arose during the marriage. If the cause of action arose before marriage or after permanent separation, then the award or settlement is SP of the injured spouse. PI awards against the other spouse are always the SP of the injured spouse. Here,
Upon divorce, CP personal injury awards are assigned entirely to the injured spouse, so long as they have not commingled and the interest of justice do not required otherwise. Here,
Disability
Disability and workers compensation benefits are treated as wage replacement, so it is characterized as CP if received during marriage or as SP if received after divorce. However, if a spouse has an option between regular retirement pension and disability retirement they cannot elect disability to defeat CP interest. Here,
Retirement Benefits
Retirement benefits are CP if earned during the course of marriage. When retirement benefits are earned both during and after and/or before marriage, then the courts will apply the time rule to determine how much of the retirement benefits are CP and SP. Here,
Retirement Benefits - Time Rule
The community’s share is calculated by determining the number of years the retirement benefits were earned while married divided by the total number of years the retirement benefits were earned. If the participant spouse is not eligible for retirement at the time of divorce, the court has the option to award funds “if and when” the retirement is received or “cash out” by awarding other assets of equal value and allowing he participating spouse to keep the pension. Here,
Severance
Courts are split on how to handle severance pay. Some view it as SP as if it were replacing lost earnings. Others view it as CP as if it were earned by employment during marriage. Here,
Stock Options
Stock options are a form of compensation. Stock options that are awarded and vest during the course of marriage are CP. But, for stock options that do not vest until after marriage, courts will look to the primary intent of the employer in granting the options, i.e. is it a reward for past service or an encouragement to remain with the company? The formula for past services is: years from employment to community end/total years employed until vested. The formula for encouraging future employment is: years from when stock option given to community end/years from option given to when it vests. Here,
Goodwill
Goodwill is the value in a business beyond labor and physical assets. Goodwill includes factors such as the reputation and client-base of a business. Goodwill, to the extent it was acquired during marriage, is considered a CP asset. Because all sources of labor and capital are community property, Pereira and Van Camp do not apply.
The value of Goodwill is established by expert witness testimony using either the Market Sale or Capitalization method. Market Sale valuation is the price the goodwill would command in a sale of the business. Capitalization method considers the present value of future income attributed to the goodwill. Here,
Education Expenses
A professional degree is not property subject to division at divorce and the community has no interest in it. However, if CP funds were used to pay education expenses, and if the education increased the spouse’s earning capacity, the community would be entitled to reimbursement at the time of divorce. Here,
Education Expenses - Defense to Reimbursement: Community Benefited from Spouse’s Education
Reimbursement may be reduced or modified if the community has already substantially benefited from the education or training. There is a rebuttable presumption that the community has already benefited if more than 10 years has elapsed between the contributions and the initiation of divorce. Here,
Education Expenses - Defense to Reimbursement: Other Spouse Also Received an Education
Reimbursement may be reduced or modified if the other spouse has also received a community funded education. Here,