CON LAW Flashcards

(78 cards)

1
Q

ARTICLE III

A

Sets forth the federal judicial power and allows for the federal courts to hear cases interpreting:
1) the constitution
2) federal law

It also can hear disputes:
1) between states
2) states + foreign citizens
3) diversity cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

JUSTICIABILITY

A

Federal courts can only hear cases and controversies depending on:
1) what the case requests (NO ADVISORY OPINIONS)
2) When is it brought (ripe or moot?)
3) Standing?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

RIPENESS

A

Prior to enforcement of law/policy, plaintiff shows:
1) issues are fit for a judicial decision AND
2) Plaintiff would suffer SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MOOTNESS

A

Requires a live controversy to exist throughout litigation and a continuing injury to plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MOOTNESS EXCEPTIONS

A

1) Issues capable of REPETITION
2) Defendant voluntary stops BUT CAN RESUME ACTING
3) Class Actions where one claim is still viable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

STANDING

A

Three major elements:
1) Injury in fact
2) Causation
3) Redress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

INJURY IN FACT

A

Plaintiff must suffer a CONCRETE AND PARTICULARIZED INJURY.

It must be PERSONAL and INDIVIDUAL

It must have ALREADY OCCURRED or IMMINENTLY WILL OCCUR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

REDRESS

A

The courts must be capable of eliminating the harm complained of.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

POLITICAL QUESTIONS

A

Cannot be decided by federal courts:
1) constitutionally committed to another branch OR
2) Incapable of resolution by courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

POLITICAL QUESTIONS EXAMPLES

A

1) Congressional procedures
2) President & Foreign policy
3) Political Gerrymandering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ADEQUATE AND INDEPENDENT STATE GROUNDS (SCOTUS JX)

A

If a state court ruling rests on 2 grounds:
1) state law
2) fed law
AND SCOTUS reversal will not change the outcome: NO SCOTUS JX

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ARTICLE II: LEGISLATIVE POWER

A

Limited powers that must be traced to the Constitution.

Enumerated + necessary and proper (but not in violation of another provision)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

TAXING AND SPENDING POWER

A

May be used for ANY PUBLIC PURPOSE not otherwise prohibited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SPENDING POWER CONDITIONS

A

Congress can impose CONDITIONS on money to state/local governments IF the conditions are:
1) Clearly stated
2) Relate to the purpose
3) NOT UNDULY COERCIVE
4) Don’t otherwise violate the Const.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

COMMERCE POWER

A

Congress can regulate interstate commerce as follows:
1) Regulate CHANNELS
2) Regulate INSTRUMENTALITIES
3) Activities that have a SUBSTANTIAL EFFECT on IC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

INTRASTATE REGULATION

A

Regulation UPHELD IF:
1) RATIONAL BASIS
2) for Congress to conclude
3) activity AGGREGATELY SUBSTANTIALLY EFFECTS IC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

NON-ECONOMIC/COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY

A

Regulation DENIED if the intrastate regulation:
1) is NOT commercial or economic
2) UNLESS there is a DIRECT SUBSTANTIAL IC EFFECT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION OF POWER: GENERAL RULE

A

Congress can delegate rulemaking/regulatory power as long:
1) GENERAL INTELLIGIBLE STANDARDS are set AND
2) the power is not UNIQUELY CONFINED to Congress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

CLAIMS OF BROAD DELEGATION ON MAJOR QUESTIONS

A

Regulations that have extraordinary economic/political significance - Court looks at:
1) has agency HISTORICALLY ASSERTED the power AND
2) is there CLEAR CONGRESSIONAL AUTH’Z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

ARTICLE II - EXECUTIVE POWERS

A

Vague duties to faithfully execute the laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

3 ZONES OF IMPLIED PRESIDENTIAL POWERS (YOUNGSTOWN)

A

1) Express or Implied Congressional Authority - MAXIMUM POWER
2) Congressional Silence - Court considers circumstances and relevant history - ZONE OF TWILIGHT (could go either way)
3) Acts AGAINST express will of Congress - ACTION IS INVALID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

PRESIDENTIAL WAR POWERS

A

1) Commander in Chief
2) NON-JUSTICIABLE POLITICAL QUESTIONS (usually)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

STATES: GENERAL POLICE POWERS

A

Under the 10th amendment, states have general police powers to:
1) regulate the health, safety, and welfare of the people

RULE: Regulations upheld if they are RATIONAL, UNLESS:
1) They burden a fundamental right or involve suspect/quasi-suspect classifications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

ANTI-COMMANDEERING

A

Congress cannot COMPEL states to enact state laws or enforce federal laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
SUPREMACY CLAUSE: EXPRESS PREEMPTION
Fed law can expressly state that states may not adopt laws concerning the subject matter of the federal law.
26
SUPREMACY CLAUSE: IMPLIED PREEMPTION
1) Conflicting laws: Both laws would be impossible to follow - state law impliedly preempted 2) State law prevents federal objective from being achieved: Preempted 3) Field Preemption: A federal law can occupy the entire field, barring state law EVEN IF NONCONFLICTING
27
SUPREMACY CLAUSE: PRESUMPTION AGAINST PREEMPTION
State laws are PRESUMED not to be superseded UNLESS there is a CLEAR AND MANIFEST PURPOSE BY CONGRESS
28
ARTICLE 4: PRIVILEGES & IMMUNITIES CLAUSE
Prevents discrimination by state AGAINST NONRESIDENTS (exceptions apply) ONLY important COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES and FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED Clause only applies to INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION
29
ARTICLE 4: P&I TEST
State law burdening important commercial activity or fundamental right invalid UNLESS: 1) it is necessary to achieve an IMPORTANT gov purpose AND 2) there are NO LESS RESTRICTIVE MEANS
30
STATE REGULATION OF COMMERCE
Where no congressional law exists in the area, states may regulate interstate commerce as long as the LAW DOES NOT: 1) Discriminate against OR 2) Unduly burden IC
31
DISCRIMINATORY STATE LAWS: COMMERCE
State laws that discriminate against IC ARE ALMOST ALWAYS INVALID It may be VALID IF: 1) necessary to achieve an important NONECONOMIC state interest AND 2) NO REASONABLE nondiscriminatory alternatives exist
32
NONDISCRIMINATORY STATE LAWS: TEST
Even if it burdens IC, it will be VALID UNLESS: 1) the burden outweighs 2) the promotion of a legit local interest 2) CONSIDER LESS RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVES
33
STATES AS "MARKET PARTICIPANTS
States may PREFER its citizens in receiving benefits of gov programs/dealing with gov-owned businesses. Usually LEGIT OBJECTIVES and not ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM
34
14th AMENDMENT
Prevents STATE deprivation of life, liberty, or property w/o due process and equal protection.
35
15th AMENDMENT
Prevents FEDS/STATE from denying citizens right to vote on basis of race/color.
36
CONGRESSIONAL POWER: 14TH AMENDMENT
Congress can enact legislation enforcing the existing constitutional rights in the 14th amendment. Congress MUST show a HISTORY OR PATTERN of state violation of the right and NARROWLY TAILOR the law to correct the violation.
37
STATE ACTION DOCTRINE
To show a constitutional violation - State action MUST be involved
38
STATE ACTION APPLIED TO PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS
1) Performance of EXCLUSIVELY PUBLIC FUNCTIONS - traditionally and exclusively the state's prerogative; OR 2) Have SIGNIFICANT STATE INVOLVEMENT - state affirmatively facilitates, encourages, or authorizers the acts; SUFFICIENT ENTWINEMENT.
39
LEVELS OF SCRUTINY: DPC, EPC, First Amendment
1) Strict Scrutiny 2) Intermediate Scrutiny 3) Rational Basis
40
RATIONAL BASIS
Applications: Regulations not affecting fundamental rights, suspect/quasi-suspect classifications RULE: Law will be upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate government purpose unless arbitrary/irrational. BURDEN: on challenger
41
INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY: QUASI-SUSPECT CLASSES (GENDER/LEGITIMACY)
RULE: Law upheld if it is SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED to an IMPORTANT government purpose. Burden: Unclear but assume government
42
STRICT SCRUTINY (FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS/SUSPECT CLASSES)
RULE: Law upheld if it is necessary to achieve a COMPELLING government purpose and no less burdensome alternatives exist. Burden: GOV
43
PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
Applies to the feds (5th amendment) and states (14th amendment). Requires intentional or reckless government action.
44
PDP: Life, Liberty and Property
Life (obvious) Liberty - includes physical freedom, right to contract, right to engage in gainful employment. A deprivation occurs if a person: 1) loses significant freedom of action OR 2) Denied a freedom provided by the constitution or statute Property (includes gov benefits) - reasonable expectation of continued receipt.
45
WHAT DOES PDP REQUIRE?
1) Notice 2) An opportunity to be heard, AND 3) A neutral decision-maker
46
PDP: HEARING REQUIREMENTS
Type and extent of hearing determined by: 1) IMPORTANCE OF THE INTEREST and 2) value of specific procedural safeguards AGAINST 3) the GOV INTEREST in fiscal/admin efficiency
47
SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS
Guarantees laws will be reasonable and not arbitrary. Applies to the feds through the 5th amendment DPC/states through the 14th amendment DPC.
48
SDP: STRICT SCRUTINY
Applies to fundamental rights including: 1) All 1st amendment rights 2) Interstate travel 3) Privacy rights 4) Voting
49
SDP: RATIONAL BASIS
Applies in all other cases. Exs. Economic rights, education.
50
SDP: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TEST
Is the unenumerated alleged right deeply rooted in the nation's HISTORY AND TRADITION and essential to the CONCEPT OF ORDERED LIBERTY?
51
DUE PROCESS V. EPC QUESTIONS
DPC: Apply when law limits rights of ALL persons to engage in an activity EPC: Apply when law treats PERSONS/CLASS OF PERSONS DIFFERENTLY
52
RESIDENCY REQ'S: RIGHT TO VOTE
REASONABLE time periods for residency (30 days) are VALID.
53
STATE AND LOCAL ELECTIONS: RIGHT TO VOTE
Population of voting districts must be SUBSTANTIALLY EQUAL - variance can't be unjustifiably large.
54
EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: STRICT SCRUTINY
Applies to fundamental rights/suspect classifications (race, national origin, alienage) Alienage only at state level discrim.
55
EPC: INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY
Applies to quasi-suspect classifications (ex. gender) - must be SUBSTANTIALLY RELATED to an IMPORTANT gov interest).
56
EPC: RATIONAL BASIS
Applies to classifications not affecting a fundamental right/suspect-quasi suspect
57
EPC: PROVING DISCRIMINATORY CLASSIFICATION
For either strict or intermediate scrutiny there must be INTENT which is shown by either: 1) Facial discrimination of the law 2) Discriminatory application of a neutral law OR 3) Facially neutral law with disparate impact
58
ANIMUS
If the gov is discriminating purposely based on dislike of a class, it will NOT MEET RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW
59
FREEDOM OF SPEECH (SPEECH DEF)
Speech includes words, symbols, and expressive conduct
60
EXPRESSIVE CONDUCT
1) Intended to convey a message AND 2) Reasonably likely to be perceived as such
61
INCITEMENT SPEECH (UNPROTECTED)
1) intended to product IMMINENT LAWLESS ACTION and 2) Likely to produce such action
62
FIGHTING WORDS (UNPROTECTED)
Are LIKELY TO INCITED IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL RETALIATION in the average person.
63
TRUE THREATS (UNPROTECTED)
Intended to convey SERIOUS THREAT OF BODILY HARM
64
OBSCENITY (UNPROTECTED)
Depicts sexual conduct in such a way that: 1) Appeals to the prurient interest in sex; 2) Patently offensive AND 3) Lacks serious value
65
DEFAMATION (PUBLIC FIGURE)
About a public figure or matter of public concern, plaintiff must prove: 1) Defamation elements PLUS 2) Falsity and some level of fault FAULT - must show actual malice (knowledge or reckless disregard)
66
COMMERCIAL SPEECH (UNPROTECTED)
NOT PROTECTED IF: 1) false, 2) Misleading OR 3) About illegal products or services
67
PROTECTED COMMERCIAL SPEECH
Other than the above, will be protected IF: 1) Serves a substantial gov interest, 2) Directly advances that interest AND 3) is narrowly tailored
68
CONTENT BASES REGS
Strict Scrutiny required and are presumptively unconstitutional. ASK: Does it restrict speech on the subject matter or viewpoint of the speech?
69
CONTENT NEUTRAL REGS
Intermediate Scrutiny: Must advance IMPORTANT interests AND must not burden SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SPEECH THAN NECESSARY
70
TRADITIONAL PUBLIC FORUMS
Apply STRICT SCRUTINY DEF: Historically open to speech related activities (parks, streets, sidewalks)
71
DESIGNATED PUBLIC FORUMS
Apply STRICT SCRUTINY DEF: Not historically open to speech related activities BUT which the gov HAS opened for such activities at times (town halls, social+civic groups)
72
TRADITIONAL + DESIGNATED FORUMS (WHEN TO APPLY INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY)
Content-neutral (viewpoint and subject matter) usually relating to TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER RESTRICTIONS REQ'S: 1) narrowly tailored to serve IMPORTANT gov interest (not least restrictive) AND 2) leave open ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS
73
LIMITED + NONPUBLIC FORUMS
Gov can reserve the forum for its intended use REGULATIONS VALID IF: 1) viewpoint neutral AND 2) REASONABLY related to a LEGIT gov purpose Viewpoint based? - STRICT
74
VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE
Fails to give reasonable notice for what is prohibited - DPC violation EX. (ban on "opprobrious and offensive words")
75
OVERBREADTH
facially invalid laws
76
PRIOR RESTRAINTS
DEF: Prevent speech before it occurs. Heavy burden of justification on the gov PROCEDURES: 1) narrowly drawn, reasonable, and definite; 2) Injunction PROMPTLY sought AND 3) Prompt and final judicial determination
77
FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE
Prohibits gov from punishing someone on basis of religious beliefs Courts evaluate SINCERITY and NOT TRUTHFULNESS
78
FREE EXERCISE: STRICT SCRUTINY APPLICATION
Apply to discriminatory laws: Discriminatory IF: 1) NOT FACIALLY NEUTRAL or 2) Facially neutral but NOT GENERALLY APPLICABLE (targets a group)