Con Law Flashcards
(14 cards)
Ripeness
Mootness
Standing
Ripe: actual harm/immediate threat of harm
Mootness: too late. Not moot if–
- injury capable of repeition
- live controversy @ least 1 member of class
- byproduct harms
Standing
- P suffered harm
- traceable to gov’t
- can be redressed
- taxpayers only when claim is about est. cl.
S. Ct. can review state ct. judgements when–
- A fed Q;
- A final judgement; and
- State decision not based on state law (outcome is the same no matter what S. Ct. stays)
A fed. ct. will abstain (& remand) when meaning of state law is at issue and unsettled/unclear.
A fed. ct. will not hear fed. Q. (maily political procedural)
11th Amendment
Cannot be sued in federal court if–
- Π is a private party
- ∆ is a government (not state employee)
unless
- State consents; or
- Cong. enforces rights (14th amdt)
State can’t be sued in its own court unless it consents (soverign immunity)
Legislative Powers
- Those enumerated in the Const.
- Necessary and Proper (“convenient and useful”)
Commerce cl.
- Purely local if “substantial affect” on interstate commerce.
- Can’t commandeer state exec/legislature
Taxing power
- Valid so long as it raises some revenue (purpose doesn’t matter)
Spending power a condition must–
- enacted for general welfare and not violate indiv. liberties.
- be reasonably related to leg. fed. interest
- be clear
Reconstruction Amdts.
- 13th (enforced against anyone)
- 14th (need state actor)
- Cong cannot redefine/create rights
- Cts. define the rights
Delegation? “intelligible principle”
Federalism
- States can’t do federal “things”
- Fed law preempts state law
- Express.
- Implied–
- inconsistent(fed law: no more than 50%, state law: 40%)
- fed reg occupies the field.
- Generally, fed law prevails over state law.
-
P/I of Art. IV says States can’t discriminate out of state citizens unless–
- hiring state gov’t employees;
- charge more for benefits
- deny benefits (in-state tuition)
- Dormant Commerce cl. (see next card)
**Dormant Commerce Cl. **
Laws that favor in-state commerce = per se invalid
- Including laws that favor for health/safety purpose w/ no reasonable non-discrim means
Undiscrimiatory laws that unreasonably burden interstate commerce
- marginal benefits that materially obstruct interstate commerce.
- Unless*
- Congress authorizes state
- State gov’t is market participant
- 21st amdt.
**State or Local law that regulates commerce: **
- Is it a state or federal law?
- fed law preempts or authorizes state law
- If no fed law, does state law discriminate other states? Invalid unless–
- health/safety w/o other means;
- state grants its own subsidies
- state is market participant
- If state law is non-discriminatory, is it unreasonably burdensome?
-
Same thing for state taxes)
- non-discrim
- substantial nexus to state (presence)
- not unreasonably burdensome (no flat taxes)
Procedural Due Process
- Was there a deprivation?
- liberty (not mere injury to reputation)
- property (gov’t benefits/employment)
- What process is due? (notice and opp. to be heard)
- Persons interest,
- risk of mistake,
- gov’t interest.
Free Speech - Campaign Contributions
Gov’t may limit $ to an individual candidate
- gov’t has substantial interest in preventing corruption
Gov’t may not limit $ to lobbyist
Free Speech - Doctrines
- Vagueness
- what are they punishing?
- Overbreadth
- bans some protected speech in its attempt to ban unprotected speech
- Prior Restraints
- can’t enjoin speech before it happens
Free Speech -
Content-based
vs
Time/Place/Manner
Content-based
- Aimed at the message
- Aimed at the content b/c of message it conveys … why is actor making the action?
Time/Place/Manner
- Not aimed at content, affects expression as a by-product.
- It must–
- content-neutral (bans all _);
- provide alternate opportunties
- serve significant state interest
What’s outside the freedom of speech?
- Incitement (immediate, intentional, likely to suceed)
- Fighting words (directed at another)
- True threats (Intent to hurt specific person/group)
- Obscenity
- Sexy (purient interest)
- Sickening (patently offensive)
- Specific (statute describes sexual conduct)
- Serious value?
- Libel/defamation
- Commercial speech
- no false/mislead/deceptive
- otherwise must advance substantial gov’t interest and be narrowly tailored.
Levels of Scrutiny
-
Strict Scrutiny
- Compelling interest … narrowly tailored
- Race, nat’l origin, alienage
-
Intermediate Scrutiny
- Important interest … substantially related
- Sex, legitimacy of birth
-
Rational Basis
- *Legitimate interest … rationally related *
- All else