Con. Law Rule Language Flashcards
(39 cards)
Commerce Clause Powers (CIA)
Through the Commerce Clause, Congress can regulate:
1.) the channels and
2.) instrumentalities of interstate commerce, persons, and things in interstate commerce, or
3.) anything that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce–meaning, it can regulate anything economic or anything noneconomic that “substantially affects” interstate commerce (even if it’s purely intrastate).
Anti Commandeering Clause
Congress cannot “commandeer” states and force states to enforce federal laws. Congress will wither have to regulate directly (if within its commerce power) or regulate indirectly by threatening to take away funding if the state does not adopt a law (under Congress’s spending power).
Dormant Commerce Clause
–Discriminatory Law
–Non discriminatory Law
“State or local regulations that discriminate against interstate commerce to protect local economic interests are almost always invalid as violations of the negative implications of the Commerce Clause.”
“If a law discriminates against interstate commerce, it is invalid unless the state can show that the law was necessary to achieve a compelling state interest and there is no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternative”
“If a state law is nondiscriminatory on its face, but it still burdens interstate commerce, it is valid only if it serves an important state interest and does not impose an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce”
Market Participant Doctrine
This doctrine is an exception to the dormant commerce clause where a state is acting as a market participant or business rather than regulator. IF the state is acting as a market participant, it is allowed to favor its own residents.
State action requirement. What constitutes “state action?”
If a plaintiff is suing under the 1, 14, or 15 amendment, the plaintiff needs to find a government actor or action “fairly attributable to the government.”
State action is present when a state passes a law, when a state permits its officials to take action, when a PRIVATE actor is performing a “traditional and exclusive” government function, or when private action is closely controlled by the state.
Strict Scrutiny
The government must prove that the law is narrowly tailored (necessary) to achieve a compelling state interest.
Intermediate Scrutiny
The government must prove the classification is substantially related to an important government interest.
Rational Basis
The plaintiff must prove that the law is NOT rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
1A General Application Language
The 1A applies to the states through the DPC of the 14th Amendment.
Unprotected Speech Standard
A law regulating protected speech needs to pass rational basis scrutiny.
Categories of Unprotected Speech
- Speech inciting immediate lawless or violent behavior
- Fighting Words
- True threats
- Obscene Speech
Speech Inciting Immediate Lawless or Violent Behavior
This is speech that is directed at inciting and likely to incite imminent lawlessness.
Fighting words
Theis is speech likely to incite an immediate violent reaction
True Threates
These are words that amount to defamation, harassment, and other forms of words as conduct
Obscene speech
The test for obscenity examines whether the speech
1. appeals to a prurient interest in sex,
2. whether it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently prurient interest in sex,
3. whether it depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and
4. whether it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific values (using a national standard).
Three types of Forums where Speech Occurs
Public forum ( streets, sidewalks, parks)
Designated public forum (schools)
Non Public forum (airports, government workplaces)
Standard for Speech Restrictions in Public and Designated Public Forums
The restriction must be content neutral, narrowly tailored to serve an important governmental interest, and leave open alternative channels of communication.
Standard for Speech Restrictions in non public forums
Must be viewpoint neutral and reasonably related to a legitimate government interest
Standard for speech restrictions in public schools
The regulations are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Eminent Domain definition and application
Neither the federal government nor the state may take private property for public use without just compensation. This arises from the 5th amendment and is applied to the states through the 14th amendment.
11th Amendment
The 11A precludes a federal court from exercising jurisdiction over a suit by a private party seeking to recover damages form the state.
Establishment Clause
“The Establishment Clause prohibits government sponsorship of
religion, meaning the government cannot aid or formally establish a
religion. Like the Free Exercise Clause, it compels the government to
pursue a course of neutrality toward religion.”
Free Exercise Clause
“The Free Exercise Clause prohibits government from punishing
someone on the basis of their religious belief or related religious
status or conduct.”
Two steps of determining a violation of the establishment clause
- Is the government action NEUTRAL toward religion?
- If not, is there a long standing history of the action being accepted, or would the Founding Fathers have found the government action to be acceptable?
If the answer to BOTH questions is no, then there has been a violation.