Con Law stuff Flashcards
Removal of Article III judges
Only by IMPEACHMENT
Standing for a legislator
Must prove **personal stake in dispute **& concrete injury to challenge constitutionality of government action.
A federal or state legislator has standing to challenge the constitutionality of government action in the rare instance that the action caused the legislator personal and concrete harm—eg, by nullifying the legislator’s vote. Institutional, abstract harm shared equally by all legislators in that respective body does not confer standing.
Child standing
Parent has standing unless parental rights have been limited by court
OR
lawsuit may adversely affect child.
Congress power to suibpoena POTUS
Speech or debate clauset
Taxpayer standing exception
Taxpayers do have standing to challenge government expenditures made pursuant to federal (or state and local) STATUTES as violating the Establishment Clause.
- NOT general executive revenues
- NOT grants of property
- NOT tax credits
Ripeness factors
- The hardship that will be suffered without pre-enforcement review—the greater the hardship without pre-enforcement review, the more likely the court will hear the case AND
- The fitness of the issues and the record for judicial review—that is, does the court have all that it needs to effectively decide the issue?
SC original js
The Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over suits between states, as well as original jurisdiction where just one of the parties is a state.
Final Judgrement rule
Generally, the Supreme Court may hear cases only after there has been a final judgment from the highest state court, a federal court of appeal, or a three-judge federal district court.
State law grounds are INDEPENDENT if:
They are independent if the decision is not based on federal case interpretations of identical federal provisions. If the state court didn’t clearly indicate whether its decision rests on state law, the Supreme Court may hear the case.
Bars against suits against state govs
The Eleventh Amendment bars suits against states in federal court
Sovereign immunity bars suits against states in state courts or federal agencies.
Exceptions:
States may be sued pursuant to federal laws adopted under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, but it must be unmistakably clear that Congress intended to remove the protection.
Abstention
- Federal courts may not enjoin pending state court proceedings.
- If state law is unclear and state court clarification of that law could make a federal constitutional ruling unnecessary, then the federal court will abstain.
Powers that congress CANNOT delegate (nondelegalble powers)
- Making/repealing laws (but not RULES - agencies can make rules too)
- Declaring war
- Impeaching federal officers
Spending conditions - upheld? not upehdld?
A federal law that would withhold 5% of the federal highway funds otherwise allocable to a state unless the state had a drinking age of not less that 21 for alcohol was upheld where the funds withheld amounted to less than one-half of 1% of the state’s total budget.
A federal law that threatened to withhold Medicaid funding from states that did not greatly expand their Medicaid program was found to be unduly coercive because the withheld funds would be about 10% of an average state’s total budget.