Conceptualization Flashcards

study for exam 2 (76 cards)

1
Q

A statistical relationship between two variables; when one variable changes, the other tends to change as well.

Ice cream sales and drowning incidents

A

Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A relationship where one variable directly affects or influences the other.

Smoking causes lung cancer.

A

Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The consistency of a measure; whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions.

A

Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Reliability

three types

A

Stability, Representative, Inter-rater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consistency across time.

type of reliability

A

Stability Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consistency across different groups.

type of reliability

A

Representative Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consistency across different raters or experts.

type of reliability

A

Inter-rater Reliability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The accuracy of a measure; whether the results represent what they are supposed to measure.

A

Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of Validity

Five types

A

Measurement, Face, Content, External, Internal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Whether the data or results reflect the intended variable.

Type of Validity

A

Measurement Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Whether the test items appear to measure what they are intended to measure.

Type of Validity

A

Face Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Whether the test covers all relevant parts of the subject.

Type of Validity

A

Content Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Whether the results can be generalized to other situations, groups, or events.

Type of Validity

A

External Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Whether the causal relationship is not influenced by other variables.

Type of Validity

A

Internal Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Threats to Validity

two types

A

external and internal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types of External Threats

three threats

A

reactive testing, subject and variable interaction, multiple treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Participants’ knowledge of the study’s purpose affects their behavior.

external threat

A

Reactive Testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Results only apply to the sample group.

external threat

A

Subject and Variable Interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Responses are altered by prior interactions.

external threat

A

Multiple Treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Types of Internal Validity Threats

six types

A

History, maturation, testing, satistical regression, bias selection of subjects, experimental mortality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Events during the research affect outcomes.

internal threats

A

History

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Changes in participants over time affect the study.

internal threats

A

Maturation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Changes in measurement tools or methods affect results.

internal threats

A

Testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Extreme scores skew results.

internal threats

A

Statistical Regression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Non-random selection affects results. | internal threats
Bias Selection of Subjects
26
Participants dropping out create uneven groups. | internal threats
Experimental Mortality
27
Defining abstract concepts (e.g., happiness, social justice) within a study.
Conceptualization
28
Defining and quantifying concepts for observation and analysis.
Measurement
29
Translating abstract concepts into specific, measurable variables.
Operationalization
30
Operationalization subgroups | three types
concepts, variable, indicator
31
General ideas or phenomena (e.g., crime). | Operationalization subgroups
Concepts
32
The specific aspects measured (e.g., murder). | Operationalization subgroups
Variable
33
Observable and measurable elements (e.g., number of arrests). | Operationalization subgroups
Indicator
34
Types of variables | four types
independent, dependent, control, extraneous (confounding)
35
The variable that stands alone and isn't affected by other variables. | types of variables
Independent variable | ex. Individual sem. assignments
36
The outcome or result influenced by the independent variable. | types of variables
Dependent Variable | ex. Overall semester grade
37
Elements kept constant during a study. | types of variables
Control Variable | ex. race/gender
38
Unaccounted-for variables that may affect the results. | types of variables
Extraneous (Confounding) Variables | ex. # hours of sleep
39
Levels of Measurement | four levels
nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio
40
Categories without order (e.g., gender, marital status).
Nominal
41
Categories with order, but unequal intervals (e.g., satisfaction level).
Ordinal
42
Ordered categories with equal intervals, no true zero (e.g., temperature).
Interval
43
Ordered categories with equal intervals and a true zero (e.g., weight, height).
Ratio
44
The entire group being studied.
population
45
A subset of the population.
sample
46
The process of selecting samples from the population.
Sampling
47
A list of the population from which the sample is drawn.
Sampling Frame
48
Types of Sampling | two types
probability and non-probability
49
Every element has an equal chance of selection. | type of sampling
Probability Sampling
50
types of probability sampling | four types
random, stratified, systematic, cluster
51
Equal chance for all participants. | probability sampling
Random Sampling
52
Population is divided into subgroups, and random samples are drawn from each. | probability sampling
Stratified Sampling
53
Selection based on a predetermined rule (e.g., every nth participant). | probability sampling
Systematic Sampling
54
Population divided into clusters, and random clusters are chosen. | probability sampling
Cluster Sampling
55
Not every element has an equal chance of selection. | type of sampling
Non-probability Sampling
56
types of non-probability sampling | four types
judgement, convinience, quota, snowball
57
Selection based on the researcher's judgment. | Non-probability Sampling
Judgment Sampling
58
Selection based on availability. | Non-probability Sampling
Convenience Sampling
59
Specific quotas are filled for subgroups. | Non-probability Sampling
Quota Sampling
60
Participants refer others to the study. | Non-probability Sampling
Snowball Sampling
61
The error that occurs when observing a sample rather than the whole population. It reflects the difference between the sample’s responses and the actual population.
Sampling Error
62
How to minimize sampling error?
increase sample size
63
Types of Measurements | three types
index, scale, composite
64
Multiple variables combined into a single score. | Types of Measurements
index
65
Weighting certain variables based on importance. | Types of Measurements
Scale
66
Combination of variables into one score. | Types of Measurements
Composite
67
Difference Between Correlation and Causation?
Correlation shows a relationship between two variables, but it doesn’t prove one causes the other. Example: Ice cream sales and drowning incidents rise together in summer but don’t cause each other.
68
Importance of Distinguishing Correlation and Causation?
Misinterpreting correlation as causation can lead to false conclusions. Correct interpretation is crucial for drawing valid inferences.
69
Difference Between Reliability and Validity?
Reliability refers to consistency, while validity refers to accuracy. A test can be reliable but not valid.
70
Conceptualization vs. Operationalization?
Conceptualization involves defining abstract concepts; operationalization translates them into measurable variables. Operationalization ensures research can be analyzed.
71
Importance of ensuring Accurate Indicators?
Indicators should align with the concept being measured and be clear and observable. Example: Using the number of drinks to measure binge drinking.
72
Probability vs. Non-probability Sampling?
Probability sampling ensures every element has an equal chance of selection, improving generalizability. Non-probability sampling is used when random selection isn’t feasible.
73
What is Stratified Sampling?
Dividing the population into strata (specific groups ex. m/f) and taking random samples from each group. It ensures all groups are represented and improves the sample’s representativeness.
74
What is Snowball Sampling?
Participants refer others, used when the population is hard to access (e.g., hidden groups). Bias can occur as the sample may not represent the broader population.
75
External vs. Internal Validity?
External validity refers to generalizability, while internal validity refers to ensuring the study’s findings aren’t affected by extraneous factors.
76
What are Extraneous Variables?
These are unmeasured variables that can skew results, leading to incorrect conclusions about causality (e.g., studying a new teaching method without accounting for students' prior knowledge).