Confidentiality Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

Confidentiallity when representing an organization

A

The ethical duty of confidentiality runs to the organization itself, rather than its constituents.

if the lawyer hears from the CFO that the corporation is engaging in criminal activities, the lawyer has a duty to disclose allegation to the president and directors and keep the allegations secret from any other employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When can a lawyer reveal confidential info about an organization?

A

If highest authority fails to insist or act upon a clear violation of law AND the lawyer reasonably certain that the failure to act will result in substantial injury to the corp. [NOT to the public]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What info is confidential

A

ALL information relating to the representation of a client AND any information that could reasonably lead to the discovery of confidential information by a 3rd party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can public information or info generally known be confidential?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can non-privileged info be confidential?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can info the client told to a 3rd party be confidential?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does a website form inviting people to submit info about representation create an obligation of confidentiality?

A

Yes, even if it doesn’t create a full A/C relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How long does the obligation of condifentiality last?

A

Even after the CL dies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the broad exceptions to the duty of confidentiality?

A
  • Informed consent
  • Disclosure is impliedly authorized
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Specific circumstances that lead to exceptions to the confidentiality requirment

A

Usually based on the need to prevent a greater harm.

MR 3.3(b) to correct false evidence or a client’s criminal or fraudulent act relating to a proceeding.

Compliance w/ a court order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Zone of danger of a violation of confidentiality

A
  • War stories. Can the listener determine who the client is?
  • Online postings, including responding to criticism.
  • “Significant matters” on firm’s website
  • Media interviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In a privileged conversation, Client tells Martyn where he was on the night in question. Can Client now be compelled to testify as to his whereabouts? What if Client has died?

A

While death has no effect on privilege, just because a conversation is privileged, does not mean the topic of that conversation is privileged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When is communication between a corporate cl priviliged?

A
  1. the communication is otherwise priviliged
  2. Communication is between an asgent or the org and a privileged person
  3. communication concerns a legal matter of interest to the organization
  4. the info is diclosed only to a) a privileged person & other agents who reasonably need to know
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How low down the corporate ladder does the privilege go?

A

Any employee, if it’s necessary to secure legal advice, can be protected by corporate privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an Upjohn warning?

A

A corporate Miranda, used to advise a consitituent that you represent the organization and not them if their interest may be adverse.

Warnings are given to make sure that the employee is not under the impression that the lawyer is also representing them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Obligations when dealing w/ an unrepresented person

Especally when Upjohn is concerned

A
  • You can’t imply you are disinterested
  • Obligation to clarify your role to one who might misunderstand
  • Can’t give legal advice except the advice to secure counsel.
17
Q

What are the specific warnings you must give for Upjohn

A
  1. ID the client and the matter. (I represent X with respect to Y)
  2. The client’s expectations: cooperate and tell the truth.
  3. Confidentiality/priv belongs to the corporation, not you, and corp has the unilateral power to waive.
  4. I don’t represent you.
  5. You may retain separate counsel.
18
Q

What is work product

A

Tangible or intangible documents prepared in anticipation of litigation

Opinion work product: consists of the opinions or mental impressions of a lawyer; all other work product is ordinary work product.

19
Q

How is work product different from

A
  • Applies to communications w/ 3rd parties
  • Applies to attorney work, like research
  • Applies only in the litigation context, not counseling.
  • Only those disclosures likely to reach adversaries waives it.
  • It can be discoverable & introduced into evidence under some circumstances
20
Q

Does the Crime-Fraud exception apply to communications about past crimes & frauds?

A

No, only for ongoing or future crimes

21
Q

Rule 1.6(B)(1)

A

A lawyer may reveal confidential info to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily injury.

Lawyer isn’t subject to damages

22
Q

What must a lawyer do before envoking 1.6(B)(1)?

A

Make a feasible, good faith, attempt to persuade the CL not to act, to warn the victem, or to take other action to prevent the harm and advise the client of the lawyer’s ability to use or disclose information.

23
Q

How much info is needed to apply 1.6(B)(1)?

A

Threat of harm must be specific an beyond a reasonable doubt. Info must be directly known to the lawyer.

24
Q

What is the difference between 1.6(B)(1) and the other exceptions provided by rule 1.6?

A

There is no requirement that the client used the attorney’s services to cause the harm

25
1.6(B)(2)
Lawyer may reveal info to prevent CL form committing a crime or fraud that could reasonably result in substantial injury to finacial interests or property of another when they have used the lawyer services
26
1.6(B)(3)
Lawyer may reveal info to mitigate or rectify substantial injury to finacial interests or property
27
What is the difference between 1.6(B)(3) and the other exceptions
It is backwars looking ast to CL action, the actions have taken place or are still happening
28
Are the 1.6(B) exceptions permissive or mandatory?
permissive and only to the point that is reasonably necessary to avoid the harm
29
Can a lawyer reveal CL info if they reasonably beleve it is necessary to get advice about the lawyer's compliance with the rules?
Yes, even when the disclosure isn't impliedly authorized
30
Can a lawyer reveal CL info to establish a claim on their own behalf?
Yes, this is sort of self defense if the lawyer is alleged to be complicit. ## Footnote Can also be done to prove serveces rendered in order to collect fees
31
Must an action have commenced for a lawyer to be able to reveal CL info and establish a defense?
Paragraph 1.6 (b)(5) does not require the lawyer to await the commencement of an action or proceeding that charges such complicity, so that the defense may be established by responding directly to a third party who has made such an assertion.
32
What does A/C privilige relate to?
a proceeding and strictly between the attorney and the client