consideration Flashcards
(43 cards)
what is consideration
means that each party must give something of value- gaining something from both sides
what the first ‘maxims’ rule
consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient
what the second ‘maxims’ rule
past consideration is not good consideration
what is the third ‘maxims’ rule
consideration must move from promisee
what is the fourth ‘maxims’ rule
performing an existing act duty cannot be the consideration for a new contract
what is the fourth part A ‘maxims’ rule
public duty
what is the fourth part b ‘maxims’ rule
a duty imposed under an existing contract
what is the fourth part c ‘maxims’ rule
a promise to make payment on an existing debt
what is consideration under Curries v Misa 1875
“some right, interest, profit, or benefit accruing to the one party, or some for bearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered, or undertake by other”
currie v Misa asserted what
“benefit gained and detriment suffered”
what was the principle of curries v misa
precedent remains extremely important in the law of contract to this day
what did currie v Misa confirm
a full contract will not exist unless some sort consideration has been offered in return
what does Lord Dunedin stated about act of forbearance
“an act of forbearance or the promise thereof is the price for which the promise of the other is bought, and the promise this given for value is enforceable”
consideration need an act of what
positive act act forbearance(not doing something)
what are the two types of valid consideration
executed or executorty
what is executed consideration
to describe the part of the bargain that has been performed
what is excutorty consideration
part of the bargain that has not yet been performed
what is meant by consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate
as long as the consideration has some value the courts will not concern themselves with adequacy
what was the consideration of Chappell & Co v Nestle Co Ltd 1960
the wrappers were part of the consideration, although they were of trivial economic value
what was the consideration in Thomas v Thomas 1842
Ps promise to pay £1 and keep in good repair was sufficient considerate
what was the consideration in White v Bluett 1853
the promise to stop complaining was consideration
what is the ratio of White v Bluett 1853
since B had no right to complain, his forbearance of complaining was not consideration in
what was the consideration in Ward v Byham 1956
father argued that the mother was under an existing duty to look after and maintain the child and therefor was not providing any consideration for the promise to make payment
what was the ratio in Ward v Byham 1965
this gone beyond her existing legal duty and therefor held provided consideration entitled to payment