Consideration Flashcards
(14 cards)
What are the 3 points for the structure
- Consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate
- Good consideration must be provided at the time of or after an argument
- Performance of an existing legal or contractual duty is not good consideration
Chapell v nestle co
Consideration must be sufficient but it need not be adequate
Thomas v Thomas
The value of each party’s consideration need not be equal
Jones v padvatton
Giving up something of value is valid consideration
White v bluett
Consideration which has no economic value is not good consideration
Re mcardle
Past consideration is not good consideration unless it’s a implied promise
Lampligh v braithwaite
Past consideration is good consideration where it has been provided at the promisers request. This creates an implied promise
Re Casey’s patents
Past consideration is good consideration where it has been provided in an employer/ employee setting
Collins v Godfrey
Performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Glasbrook bros v glamgran cc
Going beyond the existing legal duty is good consideration
Stilk v myrick
Performing an existing legal duty is not good consideration
Houstley v posnsoby
Going beyond an existing contractual duty is good consideration
Williams v roffey bros
If performing an existing contractual duty provides practical benefits this is good consideration
Scotson v pegg
Fulfilling an existing contractual duty owed to a 3rd party can amount to valid consideration for a new contract