Consideration & Intent to Create Legal Relations & Capacity Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

What is consideration in contract law?

A

Consideration is something given in exchange for a promise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of consideration?

A

Executory consideration: Promises exchanged for future performance (e.g. bilateral contracts).

Executed consideration: An act is performed in response to a promise (e.g. unilateral contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the four key rules governing consideration?

A

Consideration must not be past

Consideration must move from the promisee

Consideration need not be adequate

Consideration must be sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why must consideration not be past?

A

Because it must be given in exchange for the promise. An act done before the promise cannot have been done in return for the promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the exceptions to the past consideration rule?

A

three conditions must be met:
a) The act was done at the promisor’s request
b) There was an understanding of payment
c) The payment would have been enforceable if promised in advance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does ‘consideration must move from the promisee’ mean?

A

Only the person who provides consideration can enforce the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When is an existing contractual obligation not good consideration?

A

When a party promises to do what they are already contractually bound to do with the same party, unless they exceed their obligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is an existing obligation good consideration?

A

If there is:

A practical benefit to the other party

No economic duress

Conditions met under Williams v Roffey [1991], including reliance and benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the principle from Hartley v Ponsonby (1857)?

A

If a party exceeds their existing duty, they provide fresh consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Williams v Roffey Bros establish about factual consideration?

A

Even performance of an existing duty can be good consideration if it provides a practical benefit and is not obtained under duress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Will performing a public duty amount to good consideration?

A

Generally no. But going beyond that duty can qualify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can performance of a contractual obligation to a third party be good consideration?

A

Yes, it is sufficient if it benefits the new promisor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is part payment of a debt not generally good consideration?

A

Because the debtor is only doing what they are already obliged to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are exceptions to the rule for part-payment of debt?

A

New element added

Payment by a third party

Possibly: Promissory estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is promissory estoppel?

A

An equitable doctrine preventing a party from going back on a promise not supported by consideration when the promisee has relied on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can promissory estoppel be used as a cause of action?

A

No. It is a shield not a sword

17
Q

What are the requirements for promissory estoppel to apply?

A
  • Clear and unequivocal promise
  • Reliance by the promisee
  • It must be inequitable for the promisor to go back on the promise
18
Q

Does promissory estoppel suspend or extinguish rights?

A

Usually suspends. Rights may be revived after reasonable notice

19
Q

When will promissory estoppel not be allowed?

A

If the promise was extracted unfairly or by pressure,

20
Q

What does ‘intention to create legal relations’ mean?

A

An intention by the parties to enter into a legally binding agreement. It is a required element for contract formation.

21
Q

How is intention to create legal relations assessed?

A

Objectively. The court looks at the conduct and circumstances, not internal intentions

22
Q

What is the presumption in commercial agreements?

A

There is a presumption that legal relations are intended. This can only be rebutted with clear evidence.

23
Q

What is the effect of the phrase ‘subject to contract’?

A

It creates a strong inference that no binding contract exists until formally executed.

24
Q

What is the presumption in domestic agreements?

A

That there is no intention to create legal relations

25
When can the presumption be rebutted?
When parties are separated or in dispute, or based on conduct/language
26
What is the general rule regarding minors and contracts?
A minor (under 18) is not bound unless the contract is for necessaries or a beneficial contract of employment, education, or apprenticeship.
27
What are 'necessaries'?
Goods or services suitable to the minor’s station in life and actual needs at the time of contracting
28
When are employment or education contracts binding on minors?
Only if they are for the minor's benefit
29
Can a minor enforce a contract?
Yes, but the other party cannot enforce it against the minor unless an exception applies or the contract is ratified at 18.
30
When does a person lack capacity?
When they are unable to make a decision due to impairment, and cannot understand, retain, use, or communicate relevant information
31
What is the effect of a contract entered into by someone lacking capacity?
If for necessaries: they must pay a reasonable price (s 7 MCA 2005). Otherwise, contract is voidable if they didn’t understand and the other party knew of the incapacity
32
What rules apply to contracts made while intoxicated?
Similar to mental incapacity. The person must pay for necessaries but the contract is otherwise voidable if they lacked understanding