Consideration P3 Section B Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

what is consideration

A

consideration is something of economic value being exchanged between the parties
can be giving money, goods, services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the first rule of consideration

A

consideration must be sufficient, but needs to be adequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what does adequate mean

A

must have equal economic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the case for consideration not being of equally valuable but it not mattering

A

Chappell v Nestle Co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the case for giving something of economic value

A

Thomas v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the legal principle in Jones v Padvatton

A

even giving up something of value can be consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what did not count as consideration in White V Bluett

A

love and consideration does not count as economic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the decision in Ward v Byham

A

the mother had a legal duty to look after her won child anyway which we wil see is another reason that consideration fails
Denning most likely felt bad for the mother and decided to ignore the law here - this case likely wont be followed in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the second rule of consideration

A

Consideration must not be given in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

which case has the past consideration rule

A

Re McArdle
work was done before offer and acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the exception to the past consideration rule

A

implied promises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is implied promises

A

the exception to this rule is where someone implies payment will be made before the other party acts but does not formally agree to this until after they have acted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 2 ways to prove an implied promise

A

work requested
work from employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 2 cases to prove an implied promise

A

Lampleigh v Braithwait
Re Caseys Patents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why did Lampleigh assume he would be awarded

A

Lampleigh had completed the service before agreement
however the court said that because the work had been requested it was implied some sort of reward would be given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why did L in Re Caseyes Patents assume he would be awarded

A

it would be reasonable for an employee to expect reward for their work e.g being paid

17
Q

what is the third rule of consideration

A

Performance of an existing legal or contractual duty is not good consideration

18
Q

what is the case for existing duty

A

Collins v Godefroy

19
Q

what was the decision in Collins v Godefroy

A

the police officer had a legal obligation to appear in court already, so was giving nothing extra in return for the money
therefore this was not good consideration

20
Q

what is the case for the exception of going beyond duty

A

Glasbrook Bros. v Glamorgan CC

21
Q

what is the case for existing contractual duty

A

Stilk v Myrick

22
Q

what was the decision in Stilk v Myrick

A

Stilk was only doing what he had already agreed to do and what he would be expected to do in case of emergency anyway
there was nothing extra added to work to act as new consideration for new promise

23
Q

what is the case for exception 1 going beyond duty

A

Hartley v Ponsonby

24
Q

how can Hartley v Ponsonby be distinguished from Stilk v Myrick

A

this time there would be drastically more work due to how many people deserted and the trip would be even more dangerous than before

25
what is the case for exception 2 practical benefits
Williams v Roffey Bros
26
what was the decision in Williams v Roffey Bros
By doing the work on time , Williams was giving Doffey the extra benefit of avoiding the late fee and saved them trouble of finding someone else to finish the work instead - therefore was good consideration for extra money
27
what is the case for exception 3 third party contracts
Scotson v Pegg
28
what was the decision in Scotson v Pegg
doing the same thing but for different people is good consideration for both agreements this only applies to contractual duty not legal duties
29
what is the fourth rule of consideration
Consideration must move from the promisee
30
what is the case for consideration must move from the promisee
Tweddle v Atkinson
31
why could the son not sue in Tweddle v Atkinson even though the contract was about him
the son had given no consideration so had no right to enforce the agreement however his father HAD given consideration so his father could sue