Constitution Flashcards

1
Q

Fundamental law of a nation (written or unwritten) respecting exercise of Gov powers

A

Constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conflicting With Constitution

A

Unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federal and Provincial powers to make laws - civil liberties which LIMIT governement powers.

A

Constitutional Law in Canadaa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1867, BMA, Senate, Provincial Only

A

Constitution Act 1867

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1982 Includes Charter of rights and freedoms and Aboriginal Rights

A

Constitution Act of 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Unwritten rules used to make sense of Constitution when provincial or federal laws are unclear

A

Conventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Before Constitution UNTIL 1982, did not include Bill of Rights of Charter

A

Civil Liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Canada Act (1982) Seperates acts from UK Parliament from extending to Canada

A

Patriating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Constitution Act of 1982 brings language rights, aboriginal rights, charter rights and _____________ ____________.

A

Amending Procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Any Changes to the Constitution must be legislated by

A

Provincial and Federal Gov. – 7/10 Provinces composing of 50% population and federal agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Section 52 (1) Clause that states Constitution is the supreme law of Canada and anything inconsistant with its provisions, have no force or effect.

A

SUpremacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Section 52 (3) Clause that amendments to constitution must be consistent with authority contained in the constitution of Canada

A

Entrenchment Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Section 52 Has (3) sections

A
  1. Supremacy 2. Definition Clause 3. Entrenchment Clause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of Cases that Supreme Court may hear appeals on

A

Reference Cases or Appeals of Signifigant Importance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sources of Law (3)

A

Constitution THEN Statutes and Acts THEN Common Law or Case Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Written Document containing laws PASSED by legislature ex: Highway Traffic Act in Criminal Code of Canada

A

Statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Policy Idea, Draft a Bill, Three READINGS and a Vote

A

Statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Successful Provincial Statute Needs Royal Assent from

A

Lt. Govenor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Successful Federal Statute Needs Royal Assent from

A

Governor General

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The only BINDING precedents that are established in Common Law are from

A

The Supreme Court of Canada

21
Q

Politians create statutes, Courts reveiw statutes to make sure they are constitutional, this is called

A

Judicial Review

22
Q

Two Areas of Judicial Review are (2)

A

Division of Powers (Did they have the power to make that law) or Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Is this consistant with Charter?)

23
Q

When a law is made that is outside of the lawmakers scope of power

A

Ultra Vires

24
Q

If a law is unconstitutional Section 52 (1) Supremacy Clause can be used to strike down (no force or effect) - referred to as

A

Striking Down the LAW or SECTION of law.

25
Using Courts to Resolve Constitutional Disputes
Constitutional Litigation
26
Governements as for opinion in advance on whether a law is constitutional. Not binding but treated as such
Constitutional Reference
27
Who can challenge the law? What is this called?
Standing
28
How do you get STANDING to challenge a law?
1) Directly impacts you or 2) Meet 3 Part test (Its unconstitutional? Genuine Interest? Noone Better suited to challenge the law?)
29
Abortion Case, Individual was an Activist and wanted to challenge abortion in Canada. Three part test proved the Activist was best suited as the mother/doctor would not question the Abortion
Canada v BORROWski
30
Abortion Case - father wanted to KEEP baby. Three part test proved him to have standing.
Tremblay v. Daigle
31
Case that questioned if advocacy/activist groups have standing to challenge a law. Immigration case where a church wished to challenge changes on behalf of an immigrant
Canadian Council of Churches v. Canada - not granted standing
32
Will make arguments in a case that isnt theirs with courts permission. Argue if law is or ISNT constitutional.
Intervenor
33
Constitutional Litigation is Dependant on a 6 Part TEST
1 - Issues , 2- Standing, 3. Interventions, 4- Justiciability, 5- Mootness, 6- Constitutional Remedies
34
Mainly reference cases - courts may refuse cases with no LEGAL question that are POLITICAL
Justiciability
35
Irrelevant or has no practical effect. Must have signifigance.
Mootness
36
Roman Catholic Priest received a ticket and went to court to protest it, asked for a trial in french ( his right). Case went to Supreme Court and the Priest died before it was decided - it then became MOOT
R. v. Mercure (Mercury Speeding Ticket)
37
Remedies to an issue deemed not constitutional (6)
1- Striking Down, 2- Delaying, 3- Severance, 4- Reading In, 5- Reading Down, 6- S.24 Of Constitution Act (CHARTER BREACHES)
38
Courts Recognize a law is unconstitutional, but give government time to fix it (& CASE)
Delaying -- CANADA v BEDFORD (Prostitution)
39
If PART of an act is unconstitutional, that part can be severed. It need to make sense. (& CASE)
Severance - Reference r Alberta bill of Rights
40
The court will add words to make it constitutional (& CASE - (Father was Adoptive parent, wanted unemployment benefits but was not natural parent)
Reading In - Schachter v Canada - They added in adoptive parents so that he could receive the equal benefits
41
If act has two interpretations- read the one that makes it constitutional.
Reading Down
42
Remedies that only apply to Charter. Anyone whose rights have been infringed may apply.
Section 24 (1)
43
Remedies only apply for the Charter. Where EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED IN MANNER that infringed on individuals rights by Charter, evidence is excluded!
Section 24 (2)
44
IN LAW
Intra Vires
45
OUTSIDE Law
Ultra Vires
46
Opening Phrase of Section 91
Peace, Order and Good Governance (POGG)
47
Property and Civil Rights WITHIN the Province (Section 92)
Provincial Power 92 (13)
48
Generally " All matters of a local or private nature" IN the province (Section 92)
Provincial Power 92 (16)