Constitutional Law Flashcards
(168 cards)
Justiciability
Whether a case can be decided by a federal court depends on:
1) what case is requesting (no advisory opinions)
2) when is the case brought? (is it ripe or moot)
3) who is bringing the case? (does P have standing)
Advisory opinion
Lacks actual dispute between adverse parties or legally binding effect on the parties
Ripeness and mootness
Ripeness = no pre-enforcement review unless:
1) fit for decision (legal issue not factual)
2) P would suffer substantial hardship without review
Mootness = no live controversy and ongoing injury
Exceptions to mootness
1) capable of repetition but evading review because of short duration
2) D voluntarily stops but is free to resume
3) class actions with one live claim
Standing
1) Injury
2) causation
3) redressability
Injury in fact
1) particularized = injury affects P in a person and individual way
2) concrete = injury actually exists
Citizenship standing
No standing merely as citizen or taxpayer except:
1) challenge individual tax liability
2) congressional spending in violation of the Establishment Clause
Third party standing
No third party standing BUT:
1) A claimant with standing in their own right may assert the right of a third party if:
- it is difficult for the third party to assert their own rights or
- a close relationship between the claimant and the third party
2) An organization has standing to sue on behalf of its members if:
- there is an injury in fact to the members
- the members’ injury is related to the organization’s purpose AND
- individual member participation in the lawsuit is not required
3) Free speech claim on behalf of others whose speech would be protected under 1st Am, alleging that the government restricted substantially more speech than necessary
Causation for standing
Must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of
Redressability for standing
Decision in the litigant’s favor must be capable of eliminating their harm
Congressional conferral of standing
Congress cannot grant standing to someone who doesn’t have an injury, but it can pass a law that creates new interests, the injury of which may be sufficient for standing
Standing to enforce government statutes
P may have standing to enforce a federal law if they are within the zone of interests Congress meant to protect
Test cases
Standing is not defeated just because a P brings a case to test the constitutionality of a law
Sovereign immunity
11th Am = bars a private party’s suit against a state in courts and agencies, unless:
1) express waiver = states consent to be sued
2) implied/structural waiver = yield to certain federal powers
3) local governments can be sued
4) states can sue other states and the federal government can sue states
5) bankruptcy proceedings
6) certain actions against state officers
- personal damages
- enjoin future violative conduct
7) Congress removes the immunity
Political questions
Issues:
1) constitutionally committed to another branch of government or
2) inherently incapable of judicial resolution
Examples:
- challenges to congressional procedures for ratifying constitutional amendments
- President’s conduct on foreign policy
- political gerrymandering
Original jurisdiction of Supreme Court
1) All cases affecting:
- ambassadors
- public ministers
- consuls
2) Cases where a state is a party
Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction
1) All cases in which federal judicial power extends under Article III:
- review of constitutionality of acts of other branches
- review state acts under Supremacy Clause
2) Cases where there has been a final judgment by the lower court
A) writ of certiorari = SCT has complete discretion to hear these cases, which come from:
- cases from the highest state court involving 1) the constitutionality of a statute or 2) a state statute allegedly violating federal law
- all cases from federal courts of appeals
B) appeal = SCT must hear these cases, which are confined to decisions by three-judge federal district court panels that grant or deny injunctions
Adequate and independent state grounds
SCT will not review a state court decision that is based on adequate and independent state law grounds, even if federal issues are involved
Adequate grounds = fully dispositive of the case
Federal legislative power
Congress can exercise powers enumerated in Article I, Section 8 plus any necessary and proper powers to carry out its enumerated powers
No federal police power except
- federal lands
- military bases
- reservations
- D.C.
Necessary and proper clause
Congress can use any rational, constitutional means to exercise an enumerated power, as long as it doesn’t violate another provision of the constitution
Can NOT be used alone –> it must work in conjunction with another federal power
Taxing and spending power
Congress may tax and spend to promote the general welfare
- any public purpose not prohibited by constitution
Spending power conditions
Congress can impose conditions on the grant of money to state or local governments (“strings”)
Conditions are valid if they are:
1) clearly stated
2) related to the purpose of the program
3) not unduly coercive
4) do not otherwise violate the constitution
Most federal taxes will be upheld if…
they bear some reasonable relationship to revenue production or to promoting the general welfare