Constitutional Law Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

Hierarchy of laws

A

U.S. Constitution > treaty / federal statute (last in time prevails) > executive agreement (foreign) / executive order > state constitution > state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federal courts may hear based on :

A

i. Law-based federal jurisdiction from Constitution, federal laws and treaties, admiralty and maritime laws
ii. Party-based federal jurisdiction where U.S. gov’t is a party, State v. State, State v. other State citizen,
citizens from different states (diversity jurisdiction), foreign diplomats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Justiciability

A

Art. III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts to hearing actual cases and controversies.

RAAAMPS:
1. Ripeness
2. Abstention
3. Adequate and independent state grounds
4. (No) Advisory opinions
5. Mootness
6. Political Questions
7. Standing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standing

A

P must have standing to sue in court.
Exists when:
1) P personally suffered an injury in fact (concrete and particularized injury);
2) There is causation; AND
3) The injury is redressable by court order.

Injunctive/Declaratory Relief – P must show a concrete, imminent threat of future injury.

Third-Party Standing – Generally not permitted
UNLESS:
a) A close relationship exists;
b) It’s difficult or unlikely for the third-party to assert their rights on their own; OR
c) The third-party is an organization.

Organization Standing – Allowed to sue on behalf of the members if:
1) The suit is related to an issue germane to the organization’s purpose;
2) Members would have standing to sue; AND
3) Members’ participation is not necessary (eg remedy would be the same to all members, injunction would solve everyones problem, doesn’t work for damages because each member would have to show damages)

Taxpayer Standing – P may bring a lawsuit regarding specific amounts owed under their tax bill.
− But, a party DOES NOT have standing solely for being a taxpayer (i.e. challenging govt. expenditures).

Constitution lovers: no abstract desire to see government comply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Advisory Opinions, Ripeness, & Mootness

A

Courts CANNOT give advisory opinions or address hypothetical disputes.

Ripeness – whether the case is ready to be litigated. A case is ripe → when actual harm or an immediate threat of harm exists.
− Court may grant pre-enforcement review of a statute/law after considering: (1) hardship of the parties if no review; AND (2) fitness of the record.

Mootness – when a dispute has ended or was resolved before review.
− Exceptions →
(a) case is capable of being repeated but escapes review; (pregnancy can recur)
(b) voluntary cessation, but it can resume any time; OR
(c) class actions, where at least one member has an ongoing injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Political Question

A

Fed court will not take issues involving a matter for another branch of gov’t that the judicial process is inherently incapable of resolving and enforcing
- Textually demonstrable constitutional commitment to other branches (Senate’s sole power to impeach), lack of judicial standards (partisan but not racial gerrymandering, foreign affairs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Abstention

A

Fed court will abstain (defer to state courts) if claim is based on an undecided issue of state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Adequate and independent state grounds

A

SCOTUS will not hear a case from a state high court if its decision can be supported on state law grounds alone (even if federal Q involved), unless it was unclear whether based on state law alone, or state follows federal constitution (treat as federal law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Congressional powers

A

for federal law to be constitutional, enumerated congressional powers must justify it
Achtung: Congress does NOT have regulatory (police) power to promote health, safety, and welfare of residents except in DC

  1. Commerce clause
  2. Taxing power
  3. Spending power
  4. Delegation power
  5. Property power
  6. Speech and debate clause
  7. Impeachment power
  8. Appropriations power
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Commerce Clause

A

Under the commerce clause, Congress has broad power to regulate interstate commerce:
1) CHANNELS of interstate commerce (highways, phone lines)
2) People and INSTRUMENTALITIES of interstate commerce (cars, airplanes, pilots);
3) Economic/commercial ACTIVITIES that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

Federal regulations regarding intrastate commerce will be upheld when (1) there is a rational basis, (2) to conclude that the cumulative impact (aggregation), (3) has a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
− Aggregation CANNOT be used when the activity is not commercial/economic in nature.

Achtung: EVEN intrastate economic activity under cumulative effect doctrine, aber nicht: intrastate non-economic activity (eg guns near school), Ausn. Comprehensive scheme EXCEPTION: If Congress enacts a program that aims at interstate or economic activity, it can sweep up isolated instances of intrastate non-economic activity if those are necessary to make the program effective and have a substantial national economic effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Power to Enforce the 13th, 14th, & 15th Amendments

A

Congress has the power to enforce:
▪ 13th Amend. – abolition of slavery.
▪ 14th Amend. – privileges and immunities, due process, equal protection, apportionment of representatives.
▪ 15th Amend. – right to vote cannot be denied because of race.

Congress MAY ONLY prohibit behavior that is likely to involve a constitutional violation. There must be congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented and the legislative means adopted.
− Congress CANNOT define Constitutional rights or change substantive law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Taxing Power

A

Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises
− Duties, imposts, and excises MUST be geographically uniform throughout the U.S.
− Under 16th Amend., Congress has the power to collect taxes on income from any source.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Spending Power

A

Congress has the power to spend for the common defense and general welfare. (Achtung: aber congress cannot regulate for the general welfare except in non-state federal territories)

Congress MAY attach restrictions or conditions on States receiving federal funds, BUT must satisfy the following:
1) Spending must be for the general welfare;
2) Condition must be imposed unambiguously;
3) Condition must be related to the federal interest in national projects or programs;
4) Condition cannot induce unconstitutional activity; AND
5) Condition cannot be so coercive as to turn pressure into compulsion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Delegation Power

A

Congress can delegate powers it possesses and create an agency with legislative power to make rules:
1) The powers are delegable under the Constitution; AND
2) Congress provides reasonably intelligible standards to guide the delegation.

Non-Delegation Doctrine – Congress CANNOT delegate powers it does not have.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Property Power

A

Regulate (pass any law) and dispose of federal property, including Indian property and wild animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Speech and debate clause

A

A member of Congress (+ aides) cannot be punished for anything said on legislative floor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Impeachment power

A

Congress can remove the president, federal judges, and federal officials through impeachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Appropriations power

A

Congress can pass a bill to direct how the president must spend money
i. Earmarking funds: Executive branch must spend the funds, or obtain Congress approval to refuse spending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Executive powers

A

Achtung: partly shared with Congress
1. Congressional authorization test
2. Chief executive domestic powers (EAR PVPs)
3. Commander-in-chief (military) powers (BREW)
4. International affairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q
  1. Congressional authorization 3-prong test
A

a) Where the president acts with Congress’s express/implied authority, his power is at its apex, and his action is likely valid.

b) Where Congress is silent, the president’s action is upheld as long as the act does not take over another branch’s powers or prevent another branch from performing its tasks.

c) Where the president acts against Congress’s express will, he has little authority, and his action is likely invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q
  1. Chief executive domestic powers (EAR PVPs)
A

EAR PVPs
1. Enforcement of laws, not making them. May delegate to other executive officers. Attorney general is chief law-enforcement official. May direct federal executive agencies (executive orders) but not private parties outside the executive branch unless authorized by Congress. May set up presidential advisory commissions
2. Appointment power: President can appoint officers and high-level officials with consent of Senate, inferior officers (when such power is given by Congress)
3. Removal power: President can remove high-level, purely executive officials without cause. President may be able to remove other executive officials for good cause based on statute (e.g., corruption, incompetence), independent regulatory agency appointees (without cause unless Congress passes a law requiring good cause

  1. Pardon power (plenary): President may grant pardons before charge or after conviction to federal criminals
  2. Veto power: Proposed legislation becomes law unless wholly vetoed within 10 days of passing legislation
    a) Line-item veto is unconstitutional. President may only approve/reject a bill in toto
    b) Legislative veto (Congress changes law by majority vote after president signs) is unconstitutional
  3. Privileges: Absolute privilege to refuse to disclose national security secrets. Qualified privilege to confidential comm’n between president and advisors (balance confidentiality vs. purpose to reveal or not)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q
  1. Commadener-in-chief (military) powers (BREW)
A

BREW
1. battlefield tactical decisions
2. Respond to attacks (only Congress has power to initiate war),
3. emergency power (broad discretion to send troops abroad w/o declaration of war, whether or not Congress is in session),
4. wartime power (seize private property in wartime unless Congress denies it),

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
4. International affairs
1. Treaty power (make agreements between countries with 2/3 Senate consent) 2. executive agreements with foreign nations (Congress ratification not needed)
26
Federalism
1. Supremacy clause 2. Federal function immunity 3. Sovereign immunity 4. State Immunity from Federal Law (10th Amendment) 5. Negative/Dormant commerce clause
27
1. Supremacy Clause & Preemption
Under the Supremacy Clause, a validly enacted federal law will always preempt conflicting state law. i. Express preemption: Federal statute says federal law is exclusive in an area ii. Implied preemption: If state law conflicts with fed law, Congress shows clear intent to occupy the field, or state law impedes federal objectives iii. If no conflict or no impedance of federal objectives, state law may be broader (e.g., higher minimum wage)
28
2. Federal function immunity
Federal instrumentalities (gov’t and agencies) are immune from… i. State taxation where the “legal incidence” of the tax is on the U.S. without consent of Congress aber: Nondiscriminatory, indirect taxes OK if no unreasonable burden, e.g., state tax on fed employees ii. State regulation that would interfere with fed functions (fed law would control, per supremacy clause)
29
3. Sovereign immunity
a) Fed gov’t (U.S.) cannot be sued w/o consent. b) U.S. or another state may sue a state w/o consent
30
State Sovereign Immunity (11th Amendment)
11th Amend. prohibits a party from suing a state (or state agency) in Federal Court UNLESS: a) State explicitly consents to waive protection; b) Lawsuit pertains to federal laws adopted under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; c) Lawsuit seeks only injunctive relief against a state official; OR d) Lawsuit seeks money damages from a state official. 11th Amend. DOES NOT apply to: a) Local governments; b) A federal lawsuit by a state against another state; OR c) A lawsuit by the federal govt. against a state.
31
4. State Immunity from Federal Law (10th Amendment)
All powers not granted to the Fed Govt. are reserved to the States (unless prohibited by the Constitution), state have broad power to regulte (eg health, safety, welfare, morals) Anti-commandeering doctrine: Under case law, Congress (and likely executive orders) cannot make state legislatures pass a law or require state executive officials (e.g., police) to enforce federal law. AUSN 1. Mere prohibitions are not commandeering 2. Spending power can indirectly regulate state if condition for money is clear + not unduly coercive
32
5. Dormant/Negative Commerce Clause
Notwithstanding the above, States CANNOT pass laws that: a) DISCRIMINATE against out-of-state commerce; OR b) Place an UNDUE BURDEN on interstate commerce. Discriminatory Regulations – Laws that are facially discriminatory or have a discriminatory impact are unconstitutional UNLESS: a) The burden is narrowly tailored to achieve a legitimate, non-protectionist state objective (no less-discriminatory alternatives are available) ganz selten; OR b) The state is a market participant rather than a regulator of economic activity. Unduly Burdensome Regulations – Laws that are not discriminatory, but place an undue burden on interstate commerce are UNCONSTITUTIONAL when: 1) the burden on interstate commerce, 2) is clearly excessive to the putative benefits to the state/local govt. *Courts apply this balancing test on a case-by-case basis.
33
Governmental Action
The Constitution generally protects against governmental action at any level (federal, state, local), not actions of private individuals (except 13A), UNLESS… 1. Significant government/state involvement: Private action is closely encouraged and supported by the state (state hand in private glove); e.g., court seeks to enforce a racially restrictive covenant, or statute requires segregated public toilets 2. It is a traditional public function (powers traditionally and exclusively reserved to the govt.) (company town, not mall) 3. Mutually beneficial relation derived from unconstitutional behavior; e.g., state gets increased revenues and rents from privately owned restaurant that discriminate
34
Standards of Scrutiny
Levels of strictness when a court reviews the legitimacy of governmental acts 1. Strict scrutiny (SS): Gov’t must prove its classification is necessary to achieve a compelling gov’t interest. Classification is necessary if it is the least-restrictive means (no alternative to lessen the burden) or is narrowly tailored to serve the compelling gov’t interest (difficult test to meet—gov’t almost always loses) 2. Intermediate scrutiny (IS): Gov’t must prove its classification is substantially related to an important gov’t interest. 3. Rational basis (RB): Plaintiff must prove classification is not rationally related to any legitimate gov’t interest
35
Incorporation Doctrine
Most Amendments are applicable to the States by incorporation through the 14th Amend. Due Process Clause. Exceptions: ▪ 3rd Amend. – freedom from quartering soldiers. ▪ 5th Amend. – indictment by a grand jury. ▪ 7th Amend. – jury trial in civil cases. The 14th Amend. (equal protection) is incorporated into the 5th Amend. Due Process Clause, making it applicable to the Federal Govt.
36
Due Process Clause
No person shall be denied life, liberty, or property without due process of law. − Applicable to the States → 14th Amendment − Applicable to Fed. Govt. → 5th Amendment 1. Procedual DPC 2. Substantive DPC a) Persons: All people including aliens and corporations, not just citizens b) Liberty: Freedom of action (e.g., bodily restraint), constitutional freedom Life: Threat to life c) Property: More than belongings. Equal protection rights, constitutional freedom, e.g., public education, public employment (no property interest if “at will”), benefit under state law (welfare), licenses
37
1. Procedural Due Process
Certain procedures are required when the govt. intentionally deprives a person of life, liberty (freedom), or property (an entitlement that is not fulfilled). What adequate process is due? Mathews v. Eldridge Factors → To determine the procedure required, the court balances the: 1) Importance of the private interests (more important = more process needed); 2) Risk of error under current procedures and the value of additional procedures (more likely that government will make a mistake without procedural protection = more process needed); and 3) Importance of state interests and the burden that arises from additional safeguards (more burdensome to get protection = less process needed) *Due process usually requires notice and an unbiased hearing. Achtung: may be waived if voluntary and made knowingly
38
2. Substantive Due Process
Grds. When regulating fundamental rights, it must satisfy strict scrutiny → Govt. must show the law is necessary to serve a compelling governmental interest. When regulating activities that do not constitute a fundamental right, it must meet the rational basis test → Plaintiff must show the law is not rationally related to a legitimate govt. interest. SDP ist selbst source of fundamental individual rights not spelled elsewhere in the Constitution. Merkhilfe 1: VIP CAMPERD STOVF 1. Contraception (privacy): State cannot prohibit distribution of contraceptives, whether single or married 2. Abortion (privacy): No longer fundamental right (Dobbs). Regulation passed onto states. SS not applicable - Previously (but no longer), state reg was unconstitutional if it imposed undue burden on choice to abort, up to fetus viability. Example of undue burden: requiring spousal notice about abortion. Not undue burden: parental consent w/ judicial bypass, 24-hour waiting period, ban unsafe method - Any abortion restriction, even post-viability, must have exception to protect mother’s life or health 3. Marriage (privacy): Right to enter into (and likely, to dissolve) marriage is deemed fundamental 4. Parentage/Procreation (privacy): Reproductive rights, and child rearing, care, custody, control 5. Education (Private): Parents have a right to privately educate children outside of the public school system 6. Relatives (family relations) - Gov’t cannot prohibit members of an extended family from living in a single household - Gov’t can ban unrelated persons from living together in a single-family residence 7. Death: Right to refuse medical procedures, even if life-extending. No right to suicide or assisted suicide 8. Sexual orientation (strict RB): Gov’t cannot criminalize same-sex sexual activity (no legitimate interest) 9. Travel: Right to travel interstate and to set up residency in a new state, subject to reasonable restrictions 10. Obscene material: Right to possess in one’s home. No right to buy, sell, transport. No right to child porn 11. Vote: 15A (no race discrimination in voting), 19A (no sex discrimination in voting), 24A (no poll taxes) - Total ban (on picking/voting for a candidate) via, e.g., redistricting primarily based on race? SS - Regulation of process that makes voting harder? Undue burden balancing (gov’t interest/burden) - Reasonable restriction (on being a candidate: age, residency, filing fee, voting districts)? RB - Traditional one-person one-vote principle does not apply to special, limited-purpose voting districts, such as a water-storage district where voting is limited to landowners 12. Free association (1st Amendment): Right to belong to political groups
39
Equal Protection Clause
Prohibits the govt. from denying citizens equal protection of the laws. − Applicable to the States → 14th Amendment − Applicable to Fed. Govt. → 5th Amendment (for gross discrimination?) = where a statute or gov’t action treats similarly situated people in a dissimilar manner or singles out one class of persons (i.e., classifies people) Discriminatory Classification – exists when: a) a law is discriminatory on its face; b) a law is facially neutral, but is applied in a discriminatory manner; OR c) there’s a discriminatory motive (when the law is facially neutral, but creates a disparate impact.). When laws classify people into groups, apply the appropriate test below based on the type of class: 1. − Strict Scrutiny → suspect class (race, nationality, alienage classification under state law) or infringes on a fundamental right. • Govt. must show the classification is necessary to serve a compelling government interest. 2 .− Intermediate Scrutiny → quasi-suspect class (gender/sex, non-marital children, & most likely sexual orientation/gender identity). • Govt. must show the classification is substantially related to an important governmental interest. eg treating illegitimae children differently, gender eher nah dran an strict scrutingy (government must show exceedingly persuasive justification) 3. − Rational Basis → all other classes. • Plaintiff must show the classification is not rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest (any conceivable interest is sufficient).
40
Fallgruppe Equal Protection Race
Race discrimination – suspect classification subject to SS i. De jure (by law) segregation almost always unconst’l, e.g., school segregation, banning interracial marriage ii. De facto OK (happens through private choice and social factors, e.g., different races live in different areas) iii. Affirmative action: Overt classifications may pass SS review in affirmative action Compelling interests: Remedy state’s own (not general societal) past discrimination w/ narrow tailoring of benefits to those actually affected, or diversity in higher education (post-secondary)
41
Fallgruppe Equal Protection Citizenship
suspect classification subject to SS i. Public function EXCEPTION: State may require citizenship for state jobs that directly affect politics – RB ii. Illegal (undocumented) aliens not a protected classification – RB Illegal alien children – IS 1. Fed law may adopt immigration policy (e.g., 5yr residency req for fed Medicare benefits) – RB
42
Takings Clause
Govt. MAY take private property for public use if it provides just compensation. − Public use = it’s rationally related to a conceivablelegitimate public purpose. − Just compensation = fair market value at the time of the taking, not gain to taker, not compensated if worthless property Possessory (Per Se) Taking – Govt. physically occupies the property (even if it’s just a small portion). - no matter how minor (eg running cable lines) - temporary taking: not a per se taking, balance circumstances to determine wheteher just compensation is required Grds. Mere regulation: does not require compensation (eg zoning ordinance, ordering destruction of diseased trees, landmark ordinance) aber: Regulatory Taking – Three categories: a) Depriving Owner of ALL Economically Viable Use: Is a per se taking. b) Penn Central Taking → Court will balance these factors to determine if a taking: (1) economic impact of regulation on claimant; (2) extent of interference with the investment-backed expectations; and (3) character of regulation. c) Conditions on Approval of a Permit (aka Land-Use Exaction) → DO NOT constitute a taking if: 1) Essential nexus between state interest and permit condition exists; AND 2) Govt. makes an individualized determination that the condition is roughly proportional to advancing the state interest.
43
Privileges & Immunities Clause
Under the P&I Clause (Art. IV, Sec. 2), States CANNOT intentionally discriminate against out-of-state citizens (! gilt nur für diese) a) Article IV comity clause (basic rights): State gov’t cannot discriminate against non-residents of the state if economic discrimination affects “fundamental rights” or “important economic activities,” unless the discrimination is closely related (no less discriminatory alternative could be achieved) to a substantial gov’t interest (IS) Achtung: Non-resident discrimination cannot affect rights including civil liberties and right to work and pursue livelihood, e.g., higher license fees or taxes for out-of-staters, abortions or employment for locals only b) 14th Amendment (narrow scope, rarely used): State cannot deny citizen rights of national citizenship, e.g., to travel state lines and establish residency in a new state c) N/A to aliens and corporations (“persons”). But can protect from discrimination via DCC, 14A DPC, or 14A EPC
44
Contracts Clause
Restricts States & Local Governments from passing laws that interfere with existing contracts. Private Contracts → A state law that: 1) Substantially impairs a contract is unconstitutional, UNLESS: 2) There’s a significant & legitimate purpose for the law; AND 3) The law is reasonable & appropriate for its intended purpose. Substantial impairment (Element 1) – Is a threshold issue, and DOES NOT exist if it: a) Burdens an ancillary aspect of the contract; b) Is a heavily regulated industry by the State; c) Tracks the contracting parties’ likely intent or expectation; OR d) Allows a party to easily override the law. Means-End Balancing (Elements 2 & 3) – If a state’s law substantially impairs a contract, then courts apply a means-end balancing test (Elements 2 & 3 above). − Courts MUST give substantial deference to a state’s conclusion that its approach reasonably promotes a public purpose. Public Contracts (State is a contract party) → A heightened standard of scrutiny is used. − Complete deference to a legislative assessment of reasonableness & necessity is NOT appropriate (for means-end balancing) because the State’s self-interest is at stake. − Supreme Court has not yet articulated the exact level of scrutiny to be used. Exceptions – The Contract Clause DOES NOT: ▪ Apply to the Federal Government, Future Contracts, or Judicial Decisions. ▪ Override the Police Power of a State to protect the general welfare of its citizens.
45
Freedom of religion: Establishment Clause
Prohibits the govt. from establishing a religion OR endorsing/supporting religion. Laws that discriminate against a religion MUST satisfy strict scrutiny → Govt. must show that: 1) the law is narrowly tailored, 2) to achieve a compelling govt. interest, AND 3) that the least restrictive means was used. Laws that are facially neutral (not discriminating against a particular religion) → PROHIBITED IF historical practices & understandings of the Establishment Clause are violated. − Coercion (to support or participate in religious activity) is a primary factor for a violation.
46
Freedom of religion: Free Exercise Clause
Prohibits the govt. from interfering with the exercise of religion. Laws designed to interfere with religion are subject to strict scrutiny → Govt. must show that: 1) the law is narrowly tailored, 2) to achieve a compelling govt. interest, AND 3) that the least restrictive means was used. Laws of general applicability that cause unintentional burdens on religion are CONSTITUTIONAL, and do not offend the Free Exercise Clause. − Examples → illegal drug use, animal sacrifice.
47
Freedom of speech:
1st Amendment protects the right to freedom of speech and expressive activities that constitute speech. − Applicable to govt. by incorporation through the 14th Amendment. The right to anonymous speech and the right not to speak is protected under the 1st Amendment. − Conduct that has no communicative value is NOT protected.
48
Content-Based vs. Content Neutral Restrictions
Content-Based Restrictions – Govt. regulations regarding the content of speech (subject matter or viewpoint) are subject to strict scrutiny. − Strict Scrutiny → Govt. must show (1) the regulation is narrowly tailored, (2) to achieve a compelling govt. interest, AND (3) the least restrictive means was used. Content-Neutral Restrictions – Govt. MAY regulate the time, place, and manner of content-neutral speech if it satisfies intermediate scrutiny. − Intermediate Scrutiny → Govt. must show that (1) the regulation is narrowly tailored, (2) to achieve a significant government interest, AND (3) it leaves open alternative channels of communication.
49
Public Forums for Speech
Public Forum = Place traditionally available to the public for speech (i.e. parks, streets, public sidewalks). − Content-Based Restriction → Must satisfy Strict Scrutiny. − Content Neutral Restriction → Govt. MAY regulate time, place, and manner if it satisfies Intermediate Scrutiny. Designated Forum = A place not traditionally made available to the public for speech, but the govt. chose to make it available (i.e. school makes a classroom open for club meetings). − Treated the same as a Public Forum. Limited Forum = Non-public forums that were specifically designated by the government as open to certain groups or topics (i.e. municipal meeting rooms). − Treated the same as a Non-Public Forum. Non-Public Forum = Public places traditionally limited for speech (i.e. military bases, schools, jails, airports). − Government may regulate speech if: (1) reasonable, AND (2) viewpoint neutral. Private Property = No right to access another’s private property for speech.
50
Fighting Words
→ Not protected Fighting words = words which by their very utterance: a) Inflict injury; OR b) Tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
51
Incitement of Imminent Lawless Action
→ Not protected May be outlawed if the speech: 1) Advocates the use of force or illegality; 2) Directed to inciting/producing imminent lawless action (intent); AND 3) Likely to incite/produce such action (there is a clear and present danger that a listener will act).
52
Obscenity
→ Not protected Material is obscene when it: 1) Appeals to prurient interest (sexual interest) of an avg. person under today’s community standards; 2) Is patently offensive; AND 3) Lacks any serious artistic, literary, or scientific value. *Mere private possession of obscene material by an adult inside the home CANNOT be made criminal. − Exception → child pornography
53
Commercial Speech
→ Given fewer protection Govt. MAY regulate truthful, non-misleading commercial speech if the regulation: 1) Directly advances, 2) A substantial governmental interest, AND 3) Is no more extensive than necessary (reasonably tailored) to serve that interest. False/Misleading Commercial Speech → Not protected
54
Public School Students
Students DO NOT lose their 1st Amendment free speech rights at school, BUT schools are given great latitude to regulate speech. − A school MAY regulate speech if it shows that the conduct regulated would materially and substantially interfere with the operation of the school.
55
Government Employees
Two-Step Test to determine if their speech is protected: ▪ Step 1: Did employee speak as a citizen on a matter of public concern? o If no → speech is not protected o If yes → go to Step 2 ▪ Step 2: Did the govt. entity have an adequate justification for treating the employee differently from any other member of the general public (based on the govt. interests as an employer)? o The court must balance the employee’s rights vs. the govt. employer’s interests. If a govt. employee speaks pursuant to their official duties, then the speech is NOT protected.
56
Expressive Conduct / Symbolic Speech
the expression of ideas through non-verbal actions. − Treated the same as verbal speech.
57
Prior Restraint
occurs when the govt. attempts to prohibit speech before it happens through a court order or licensing requirement. − Generally disfavored and unconstitutional, except in very limited circumstances (i.e. where national security is at stake). − Court orders preventing speech must satisfy Strict Scrutiny. Procedural Safeguards for Licensing – Are permitted if: 1) Govt. has an important reason; 2) Specific, articulated standards to remove discretion; AND 3) Procedural safeguards are in place, including a prompt final judicial decision when a license is denied.
58
Vague & Overbroad Laws
→ are unconstitutional Unduly Vague = does not put the public on reasonable notice as to what is prohibited. Overbroad = regulates more speech than is constitutionally permitted.
59
Freedom of press: Defamation & Actual Malice Standard
The press is afforded heightened protection under the 1st Amendment for Defamation lawsuits depending on the type of person. Defamation Elements – P must prove: 1) a false defamatory statement (a statement that tends to harm the reputation of another); 2) of and concerning the P made by D; 3) publication by D to a third-party; AND 4) damages. Public Official or Public Figure → P must also prove actual malice to be successful; that Defendant spoke with either: a) Recklessness; OR b) Knowledge of its falsity. *Proof of negligence is insufficient. Private Citizen speaking on a matter of public concern → To be successful, P must also prove that the speaker was negligent.
60
Freedom of press: Disclosure of Private Facts & Generally Applicable Laws
1st Amend. protects the press from liability when: 1) publishing truthful private facts, 2) regarding a matter of public concern, 3) where info was legally obtained by the publisher, AND 4) there is no knowledge that the info was obtained illegally (if illegally obtained info was published). 1st Amend. DOES NOT protect the press from liability for violating generally applicable laws.
61
Freedom of Association
Is a fundamental right under 1s amendment. The govt. may only regulate the right to freely associate in a group if it satisfies Strict Scrutiny. − Strict Scrutiny → Govt. must show (1) regulation is necessary, (2) to achieve a compelling govt.interest, AND (3) the least restrictive means was used. The govt. may punish a person’s membership in a group if it proves the: 1) Group is actively engaged in illegal activity or incites imminent lawless action; 2) Person has knowledge of the group’s illegal activities; AND 3) Person has the specific intent of furthering those activities.