Constitutional Law Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

Federal Judicial Review

Requirements for Cases and Controversies (i.e. Justiciability Doctrines)

A

**1. Standing
a. Injury (past or future; personal)
b. Causation and Redressability (defendant
caused injury and a favorable ct decision
will remedy injury)
c. No 3rd party standing (close relationship
exception, 3rd party is unlikely to be able
to, organization on behalf of its
members)
d. No generalized grievances

**ON MBE, if they ask which has best standing, look first for personal injury then at who has economic injury

  1. Ripeness (pre-enforcement review)
    a. hardship suffered w/out it
    b. fitness of issues and the record for
    review
  2. Mootness (events after filing end P’s injury)
    -Exception: wrong capable of repetition but
    evading review (abortion), voluntary
    cessation, Class Action suits
  3. Political Question Doctrine (constitutional
    violations fed ct. will NOT adjudicate)
    a. Republican form of gov’t clause
    b. challenges to pres’ conduct of foreign
    policy
    c. challenges to impeachment and removal
    process
    d. challenges to partisan gerrymandering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How Supreme Court Can Hear Cases

A
  1. By writ of certiorari
    -State Court cases
    -US Ct of App cases
  2. Appeals of three-judge fed dist. ct. skip fed
    ct of app and goes straight to S.Ct.
  3. S.Ct. has exclusive/original jurisdiction for
    suits between state gov’ts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When S.Ct. Can Hear Cases

A
  1. upon final judgment of the highest state court; OR
  2. of a US Ct of App; OR
  3. a three-judge federal district court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rule on S.Ct. reviewing state court decisions that rest on 2 grounds

A

S.Ct. can review a state court decision that rests on two grounds, one state law and one fed law, ONLY if there is NOT an independent and adequate state law ground for the decision

(AKA if their reversal of the fed. law ground will NOT change the result in the case, then the S.Ct. can’t hear it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lower Federal Court Review

Sovereign Immunity

A
  1. 11th Amendment bars suits against states in federal court (even if based on federal claims)
  2. S.I. bars suits against states in state courts or federal agencies

Exceptions:

  1. Waiver by state (must be EXPLICIT)
  2. Sued under fed laws under Section 5 of 14th Amendment
  3. Fed gov’t can sue state gov’t
  4. Bankruptcy proceedings (student loans)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When Lawsuits Against State Officers Are Allowed

A
  1. for injunctive relief

2. for money damages to be paid by THEM (NOT if the state treasury will be paying)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Abstention in lower federal ct review

A

Federal courts may NOT enjoin/hear pending state court proceedings (even if the fed ct would have jurisdiction over it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Federal Legislative Power

Congress’s Authority to Act

A
  1. Express or Implied Congressional Power
    -NO police power except: Military, Indian
    reservation, federal lands, District of
    Columbia)
  2. Necessary and Proper Clause-any means not
    prohibited by Constitution
  3. Taxing/Spending Power and Commerce
    Power
    a. for general welfare (affordable care act)
    b. Commerce power: regulate channels of
    interstate commerce, regulate
    instrumentalities and persons or things,
    regulate economic activities that have a
    substantial effect on interstate commerce
  4. 10th Amendment as a limit: all powers not
    granted to the US, nor prohibited to the
    states, are reserved to the states (Congress
    can’t compel state regulatory or legislative
    action but can prohibit harmful commercial
    activity by state gov’t)
  5. Power under Section 5 of 14th Amendment (Congress can’t create new rights or expand the scope of existing ones but can prevent or remedy violations if PROPORTIONATE AND CONGRUENT to remedying the violations)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Delegation of Congress’s Powers

A
  1. NO limit exists on their ability to delegate legislative power
  2. Legislative vetos (without bicameralism) and Line-item vetos (by president) are UNCONSTITUTIONAL
  3. Congress can’t delegate executive power to itself or its officers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Federal Executive Power

Foreign Policy: Treaties

A

Treaties (only effective when ratified by Senate)

  1. Treaties beat conflicting state laws
  2. Treaty vs. Federal Law= most recent/last one adopted wins
  3. Treaty that conflicts with Constitution is invalid
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Federal Executive Power

Foreign Policy: Executive Agreements

A

Executive Agreements (effective when signed by the press and head of a foreign nation)

  1. Can be used for ANY purpose (have never been found unconstitutional)
  2. Prevail over state laws
  3. NEVER prevail over conflicting federal laws or Constitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Federal Executive Power

Foreign Policy: President’s Use of Troops in Foreign Countries

A

President has broad powers as commander in chief to use american troops in foreign countries (never has been found to be unconstitutional)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Federal Executive Power

Domestic Affairs: Appointment Power

A
  1. President is ONLY one who appoints
  2. Congress can VEST appointment in the President, heads of departments, or lower federal courts
  3. Congress CANNOT give itself or its officers appointment power
  4. President CANNOT make recess appointments for intrasession recesses that are less than 10 days
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Federal Executive Power

Domestic Affairs: Removal Power

A

-President can fire any exec branch officer (unless limited by statute)

  • For congress to limit removal, it must:
    1) be an office where independence from the president is desirable (can’t limit pres’ ability to fire his cabinet members but CAN limit pres’ removal of special prosecutor/independent counsel); and
    2) Congress CAN’T prohibit removal, just limit it when there is good cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Domestic Affairs: Impeachment and Removal

A
  1. Can be impeached and removed for treason, bribery, or for high crimes and misdemeanors
    a. impeachment does NOT remove a person from office
    b. Impeachment by the House of Reps requires a majority vote; conviction in the Senate requires 2/3 vote
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

President’s Absolute Immunity

A

Pres has absolute immunity in civil suits for money damages for any actions WHILE in office (but NOT any actions that occurred before he took office)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

President’s Executive Privilege

A

Pres has executive privilege for presidential papers and conversations, but this privilege yields to other important government interests (like having evidence in a criminal trial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Presidential Pardon

A
  1. Pres can pardon anyone accused OR convicted of FEDERAL crimes (only exception is that you CAN’T pardon a president who’s been impeached)
  2. Pres can pardon ONLY those facing criminal liability, NOT civil liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Federalism

3 Types of Preemption/Supremacy Clause

A

Supremacy Clause: Constitution and laws/treaties made pursuant to it are THE LAW OF THE LAND

  1. Express: federal statute explicitly says it
    preempts state laws
  2. Implied: fed. statute is silent on preemption
    but
    a. If federal and state laws are mutually
    exclusive, federal law preempts it
    (exception: States can set environmental
    standards unless Congress clearly
    prohibits its)
    b. If state law impeded the achievement of
    a federal objective then federal law will
    preempt
    c. if congress evidences a clear intent to
    preempt state law, federal law will
    preempt it (fed. immigration law ALWAYS
    preempts state laws that attempt to
    regulate immigration)
  3. States may NOT tax or regulate federal government activity (inter-governmental immunity) (it’s unconstitutional to pay state tax out of federal treasury)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Federalism

Dormant Commerce Clause

A

(AKA: Negative Implications of the Commerce Clause)

1) Authority for Congress to act =CC
2) Limit on what state courts can do=DCC

DCC= State/local law is unconstitutional if it places undue burden on interstate commerce, UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important government purpose, AND, NO less discriminatory regulation would suffice to reach the gov’ts objective

  • the DCC is not expressly in constitution
  • the burdens must exceed the benefits

**if a CORPORATION is challenger of discrimination=ONLY DCC analysis; BUT IF state or local law discriminating against out of stater PERSON/CITIZEN, then BOTH DCC AND P&I of Art. IV.

  • Exceptions:
    1) Congressional approval
    2) Market Participant (state schools charging less to in-state students b/c it’s a gov’t owned business)
21
Q

Federalism

Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV

A
  • An anti-discrimination provision
  • *ONLY applies when state discriminates against out-of-staters!

-Says that no state may deny citizens of other states the privilege and immunities of its own citizens or the fundamental rights or important economic activities/ the right to earn a living, UNLESS it is necessary to achieve an important gov’t purpose

**if a CORPORATION is challenger of discrimination=ONLY DCC analysis; BUT IF state or local law discriminating against out of stater PERSON/CITIZEN, then BOTH DCC AND P&I of Art. IV.

-Corporations and Aliens CANNOT use this

22
Q

Federalism

Privileges and Immunities Clause of 14th Amendment

A

ALWAYS WRONG ANSWER UNLESS QUESTION INVOLVES THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL

23
Q

State taxation of interstate commerce

A
  1. States may not use their tax systems to help in -state businesses
  2. A state may only tax activities if there is a substantial nexus to the state
  3. State taxation of interstate businesses must be fairly apportioned
24
Q

Full Faith and Credit From One State Court to Another

A

Courts in one state must give FF&C to judgments in other state courts as long as:

1) the court that rendered the judgment has JURISDICTION (both in personam and SMJ)
2) Judgement was on the MERITS
3. Judgment was FINAL

25
Government Action and the Constitution Congress' Power
Constitution applies ONLY to gov't action (private conduct need not comply w/ const.) 1. Congress can use the 13th to eradicate SLAVERY (private race discrimination will NEVER violate 13th A by itself, but it can violate fed. statute adopted under 13th A) 2. Congress can use the Commerce Power to Apply Constitutional Norms to Private Conduct 3. Congress CANNOT use section 5 of 14th Amendment to regulate private behavior (ONLY state and local gov't)
26
Exceptions where private conduct must comply w/ the Constitution
** 1. Public Function Exception: Private entity is performing a task traditionally/exclusively done by gov't 2. Entanglement Exception: if the gov't affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates unconstitutional activity a. Courts can't enforce racially restrictive covenants b. There IS state action when gov't leases premises to a restaurant that racially discriminates c. There IS state action when state provides FREE books to schools that racially discriminate d. NO state action when a private school that is over 99% funded by the gov't fires a teacher b/c of her SPEECH e. NO state action when NCAA orders the suspension of a ball coach at a state university (b/c NCAA operates all over the country) f. IS state action when a private entity (TN Athletics Association) regulates interscholastic sports w/in a state g. NOT state action when a private club with a liquor license from the state racially discriminates
27
Application of the Bill of Rights
- BoR applies DIRECTLY ONLY TO FEDERAL GOV'T - Is applied to states (indirectly) through its incorporation into the due process clause of the 14th Amendment * *Never has S.Ct. held that ENTIRE BoR applies to state/local gov't b/c of these 4 instances: 1) 3rd A right to not have a soldier quartered in a person's home 2) 5th A right to grand jury indictment in criminal cases 3) 7th A right to jury trial in civil cases 4) 8th A right against excessive fines
28
Levels of Scrutiny Rational Basis Test
* *law is upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate gov’t purpose * *Plaintiff/person bringing suit has the burden of proof (AKA the law will be upheld unless either there’s no rational conceivable purpose or the law is not rationally related to the goal) - permissible, legitimate only requirement; doesn’t have to be actual purpose is legit, just as long as there is a conceivable legit purpose that’s good enough - means has to be reasonable or rational way of achieving the goal - deferential to the gov’t=gov’t rarely loses under this review
29
Levels of Scrutiny Intermediate Scrutiny
* *law is upheld if it is substantially related to an important gov’t purpose * *Burden of proof is on the gov't (AKA law will be upheld only if gov’t can prove its actions are substantially related to an important gov’t purpose) * *means must be NARROWLY TAILORED to achieving the objective - gov’t goal has to be more than just legitimate - court has to be persuaded the gov’t goal is important - has to look at ACTUAL purpose and whether it is important - means must be substantially related to achieving the objective - means must be a very good way to achieve the objective; NOT the best way or least restrictive way!!
30
Levels of Scrutiny Strict Scrutiny
* *law will be upheld if it is necessary to achieve a compelling governmental purpose * *burden is on the gov’t; gov’t must prove its action is necessary to achieve a compelling purpose * *LEAST RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVE; gov’t must show that NO less restrictive alternative can achieve its goal - court has to believe the gov’t goal is CRUCIAL VITAL or COMPELLING - court will only look at the gov’t ACTUAL purpose - gov’t must convince court it is doing what’s necessary to obtain the objective - means must be NARROWLY TAILORED and here, the means must be NECESSARY and shown to be least restrictive - gov’t generally loses under this!
31
Individual Rights 3 Types of Due Process
1. Procedural Due Process: has gov't followed adequate procedures to take away someone's life, liberty, and property? Notice? 2. Substantive Due Process: Does gov't have an adequate reason to take away someone's life, liberty, property? Sufficient substantive justification? 3. Equal Protection: Is the gov't differences in treatment of people adequately justified?
32
Deprivation of Liberty vs. Property
Dep. of Liberty= loss of significant freedom provided by Constitution or a statute Dep. of Property= ENTITLEMENT that is not fulfilled; entitlement is the reasonable expectation to continue receiving a benefit
33
Balancing Test for Procedural Due Process Procedures If There Has been a deprivation of life, liberty, or property
Balance: 1. Importance of the Interest to the Individual 2. Ability of additional procedures to increase the accuracy of the fact-finding (the more likely the addition of procedures will lead to better, more accurate facts, or will reduce the risks of erroneous deprivation, then the more likely the court will require them) 3. Government's interests (i.e. efficiency, saving money, etc.)
34
Takings Clause Test
Has private property been taken (and thus the Gov't has to justly compensate the citizen)? 1. Is there a taking? (two types) a. Possessory Taking: Gov't confiscation or physical occupation of land is a taking b. Regulatory Taking: Gov't regulation is a taking if it leaves no reasonable economically viable use of the property 2. Is it for public use? (BROAD definition: reasonable belief it will benefit the public) 3. Is just compensation paid? (measured in terms of loss to OWNER (i.e. fair market value of house/property) not gain to taker)
35
Contracts Clause Test (State or Local interference w/ private contracts=intermediate scrutiny)
1. Does the legislation substantially impair a party's rights under an existing contract? 2. If so, is the law a reasonably and narrowly tailored means of promoting an important and legitimate public interest?
36
Equal Protection Analysis Process
1. What is the classification? 2. What level of scrutiny should be applied? 3. Does this law meet the level of scrutiny?
37
Obscenity and Sexually-Oriented Speech (1st Amendment) Test
How to decide if something is obscene, sexually-oriented speech 1. The material must appeal to the prurient interest (excites lustful or lascivious thoughts) * *community/local standard 2. The material must be patently offensive under the law prohibiting obscenity (patently offensive standard is whatever the court has previously held falls under this ) 3. Taken as a whole, the material must lack serious redeeming artistic, literary, political or scientific value * *national standard
38
Defamation: Public Official
Must prove: 1. Falsity of the Statement 2. Actual Malice
39
Defamation: Public Figure
Must prove: 1. Falsity of the statement 2. Actual Malice
40
Defamation: Private Figure, Matter of Public Concern
Must prove: 1. Falsity 2. Negligence by the speaker/defendant (to recover presumed or punitive damages then must prove actual malice)
41
Defamation: Private Figure, Matter of Private Concern
Must prove: 1. Falsity 2. Negligence by the speaker/defendant (can recover presumed or punitive damages WITHOUT proving actual malice)
42
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (for defamatory speech)
Must meet defamation standards for that given person
43
Public Forums and 1st Amendment Regulations
Regulations: 1. Subject matter AND 2. viewpoint neutral if not, Strict Scrutiny must be met Not least restrictive, but NARROWLY TAILORED Must be IMPORTANT gov't interest -Can regulate time, place, or manner
44
Designated Public Forums and 1st Amendment Regulations
Regulations: 1. subject matter AND 2. viewpoint neutral (same as public forums) if not, strict scrutiny must be met Not least restrictive, but NARROWLY TAILORED Must be an IMPORTANT gov't interest -Can regulate time, place, or manner
45
Limited Public Forums and 1st Amendment Regulations
Regulations: 1. Reasonable AND 2. viewpoint neutral Must be a LEGITIMATE gov't interest
46
Non-public Forums and 1st Amendment Regulations
Regulations: 1. Reasonable AND 2. Viewpoint neutral Must be a LEGITIMATE gov't interest
47
Test of when you gov't can punish membership in a group
Must be proven that the person: 1. Is actively affiliated with the group 2. Knowing of its illegal activities; AND 3. With the specific intent of furthering those illegal activities
48
Establishment Clause Test
A law does not violate the establishment clause if: 1. There is a secular purpose for the law AND 2. The effect must be neither to advance nor inhibit religion AND 3. There must not be excessive entanglement with religion