Contract Cases Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

Even if a letter is destroyed, lost .. Acceptance is still effectively communicated at the moment of the postage

A

Adam V Lindsell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When a part of the contract is meaningless

A

Nicolene V Simmonds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Must consider if the person had the capability at the time of entering in transaction

A

Fehily V Akinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unauthorized 3rd party

A

Wenkheim V Ardnt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acted like if there was a contract for years

A

Foley V classic coaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

No completed contract, two letters received at the same time so time to cancel the offer

A

Dunmore V Alexander

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

6 week doesn’t mean they are bound. Fundamental principles of contract law, both parties need to agree.

A

Routledge V Grant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

He refused the offer at 100£

A

Hyde V Wrench

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

English law, postal rule does not apply to instantaneous communication

A

Entorse V Miles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Riding his friend on his bike
There was no contract

A

Coward V MIB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cannot be prosecuted for obscenity if it contains artistic merit

A

R V Penguin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A minor is obligated to pay only if the good is a necessarity

A

Nash V Inman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Didn’t hear about the changement

A

Taylor V Laird

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

May be prepared + new council

A

Gibson V MCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Clear in his language that he wanted to be legally bound

A

Storer V MCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give his wife 30 per month

A

Barbour V Barbour

17
Q

Had to pay 1/month for the economical part of the contract

A

Thomas V Thomas

18
Q

Company held to be negligent

A

Smith V Leech brain & co

19
Q

In the public area it is their duty but not in the colliery

A

Glasbrook V glamorgan

20
Q

Didn’t take into account his old sexual life and directly applied art 6

21
Q

The wrappers did form part of the consideration fort the sale of records despite they have no economical value

A

Chappell & co V Nestle co

22
Q

Agreement who didn’t reach the status of contract

A

Barbour v Barbour

23
Q

A reasonable person would have expected the same oats than in the sample

A

Smith v hughes

24
Q

That employers are responsible for the behavior of their employees

A

Catholic child welfare society v the institute

25
The policy was legitimate but not justified
Sg V Saint Gregory’s catholic science college
26
Displaying on a window is an invitation to treat
Fisher v Bell
27
The letter of intent expired while negociations vers still on
RTS flexible systems v molkerei
28
Consumer make an offer while giving money to the pharmacist ( not the opposite)
Great Britain v Boots cash chemists
29
Bird on sale Invitation to treat not an offer
Partridge v crittenden
30
The first letter sent was the buyer so there is a contract
Henthorn v Fraser
31
Whisky got stolen during the night (the delivery note was already signed). The protection wasn’t enough and it caused loss
British road v Arthur crutchley
32
Londonian company sent their acceptance by Telex to Austria . There was a breach of contract. Court: the communication of acceptance was received in Austria so it is an Austrian contract.
Brinkibon v stahag stahl