Contract Law Flashcards
(9 cards)
What are an innocent party’s rights for breach of a condition and breach of an innominate term?
Breach of a condition
—> right to terminate AND damages
Breach of an innominate term
—> same as above but ONLY where the breach is sufficiently serious to be treated as repudiatory
The rule in Hadley v Baxendale
- sets out the traditional test of remoteness
Hadley v Baxendale
special notice
The Achilleas
A loss for which the seller has “assumed responsibility”
What is the law on penalties?
- penalty rule only regulates secondary obligations
- test is whether the secondary obligation imposes a detriment on the contract breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of the primary obligation
- whether the remedy is extravagant, exorbitant or unconscionable
- if a penalty, the penalty element would be unenforceable but the balance would still be payable
Cavendish v Makdessi
Practical point: need to be careful with default rates of interest
Variation to a contract
Prudent that an agreement that varies the terms of an existing contract should be supported by consideration or executed as a deed.
Contra proferentem rule
- may apply where drafting is ambiguous in a contractual exclusion clause
- an interpretive rule that provides that where a party has drafted or proposed an ambiguous clause and later seeks to rely on that clause - the court will adopt the interpretation most favourable to the other contracting party
- the clause must be ambiguous in the first place
Mitigation
Common law provides that avoidable losses are not recoverable if a claimant acts unreasonably by not avoiding them
Severance and the blue pencil test
- a court does not need express authorisation in a contract to sever unenforceable wording from a clause
- it must be possible to strike out the unenforceable wording without adding to or modifying the wording that remains
Variations
Despite developments on the need for consideration when varying an existing contract (Williams v Roffey), it’s prudent that an agreement that varies the terms of an existing contract is supported by consideration or executed as a deed
If you are seeking a guarantee what potential problems should you be mindful of?
1 - reliant on underlying obligation
a guarantor’s liability under a guarantee is contingent on the underlying obligation - so if the underlying obligation is void and unenforceable, the guarantee will fall away
2 - inadvertent release by amending the underlying contract
as a general rule, any amendments to the underlying contract after giving the guarantee will discharge the guarantor’s liability under the guarantee unless:
I) the guarantor consents to the variation; or
II) the variation is patently insubstantial or incapable of adversely affecting the guarantor
Get consent of the guarantor to the amendment
- still need substance / credit worth of the guarantor