Contract law cases Flashcards

1
Q

Gibson V Manchester City council

A

An offer must be definite in its terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Patridge V Crittenden

A

Advertisements are not offers but invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fisher V Bell

A

Goods in a shop window or shelves are invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Harvey V Facey

A

Request for information is an invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Taylor V Laird

A

Offer comes into existence when it is communicated to the offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Routledge V Grant

A

An offer can end through revocation of the offer before acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hyde V Wrench

A

A counter offer is a rejection of an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ramsgate Victoria Hotel V Montefien

A

A lapse of time can end an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Felthouse V Bindeyy

A

Acceptance cannot be silence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reveille Independent LLC V Anotech International

A

Acceptance by conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Adams V Lindsell

A

Acceptance occurs immediatly a letter is posted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Brinkibon LTD V Stanley Stahl

A

Electronic methods of communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Currie V Misa

A

‘some right, interest, profit or benefit accruing to one party or some forbearance, detriment, loss or responsibility given, suffered or undertaken by the other’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chappell V Nestle CO LTS

A

Consideration need not be sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

White V Bluett

A

Consiideration must be real and have some value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RE Casey’s Patent

A

Past consideration is no consideration

17
Q

Tweedle V Atkinson

A

Consideration must move from the promise

18
Q

Collins V Godefroy

A

Performing a pre existing duty cannot be the consideration for a new contract

19
Q

Foakes V Beer

A

A promise to accept part payment of an existing debt in place of the whole debt is not consideration

20
Q
A