Contract - Mistake Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Couturier v Hastie

A

Common mistake as to the existence of the subject matter.

Parties contracted to buy/sell goods without knowledge that goods had already been destroyed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cooper v Phibbs

A

Common mistake as to the existence of the subject matter.

X contracted to sell his land to Y, but the land already belonged to someone else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bell v Lever Brothers

A

Common mistake as to fundamental fact or quality.

Must consider: “does the state of the new facts destroy the identity of the subject-matter as it was in the original state of the facts?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Raffles v Wichelhaus

A

Mutual mistake - definition:

“objective appraisal of the facts reveals no agreement has been reached as to the terms of the contract”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Smith v Hughes

A

Oats case

For mutual mistake - objective test applied by the courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hartog v Colin & Shields

A

Unilateral mistake

If offeror had made a mistaken offer contrary to hi intention, a knowing offeree cannot accept this offer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

L’estrange v Graucob

A

A signature is binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Thoroughgood’s Case

A

Exception to L’estrange (signature is binding):

Person signing was suffering from blindness, illiteracy or senility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Saunders v Anglia Building Society

A

Signature not binding if there has been fraudulent misrepresentation, however signing party must have taken reasonable care to ensure it was not fraudulent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lewis v Avery

A

Mistake as to person’s identity (identity not attributes)

‘Richard Greene’ the rogue.

Face to face mistake - contract voidable - there is a rebuttable presumption that one intends to deal with the person one is facing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson

A

Mistaken identity - distance selling

Mitsubishi and the rogue.

Contact void - seller not finance company but dealership.

N.B. Dissenting opinion from Lord Nicholls: remove face-to-face distinction and protect good faith purchaser in all cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly