Contract Remedies Flashcards
(110 cards)
What are damages?
A sum of money paid by the defendant to the claimant once liability is established in compensation for the harm suffered by the claimant
What case defined the purpose of damages?
Robinson vs Harman
What is Baron Parke’s quote from Robinson vs Harman?
The purpose of damages is to put the victim into the same position he would have been in if the contract had not been broken but had been performed in the manner and at the time intended by the parties
What are the 2 tests used to assess an award for an unliquidated sum of damages in contract law?
- Concerns the loss in respect of which the claimant can recover
- Concerns the quantity of damages available
What does the first test used to assess an award for an unliquidated sum of damages concern?
Causation
What is the general principle regarding an award of damages and causation?
A causal link has to be proved between D’s breach of contract and the damage suffered by the claimant
Damages will not be awarded when the loss suffered is too remote a consequence of D’s breach
What is the POL from London Joint Stock Bank vs MacMillan?
If a loss arises partly from the breach and partly as a result of intervening events, the party in breach may still be liable provided that the chain of causation is not broken
What case states that ‘If a loss arises partly from the breach and partly as a result of intervening events, the party in breach may still be liable provided that the chain of causation is not broken’?
London Joint Stock Bank vs MacMillan
What is the POL from Stansbie vs Troman?
The decorator was liable for the loss which resulted from his failure to comply with his contractual duty to secure the premises properly when leaving
What case states that ‘The decorator was liable for the loss which resulted from his failure to comply with his contractual duty to secure the premises properly when leaving’?
Stansbie vs Troman
What case did the test of remoteness of damage come from?
Hadley vs Baxendale
What is the quote from Hadley vs Baxendale regarding the test of remoteness of damage?
The damages which the other party ought to receive in respect of a breach of contract should be such as may fairly and reasonably be considered either naturally or such as may be supposed reasonably to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract as the probable result of the breach
What is the POL from Hadley vs Baxendale?
The courier was unaware of the importance of a prompt delivery so wasn’t liable for the damages suffered by the mill
Due to the ruling in Hadley vs Baxendale, how is the remoteness of damage test carried out?
In 2 parts - Objectively and subjectively
What is the objective remoteness of damage test?
What loss was a natural consequence of the breach
What is the subjective remoteness of damage test?
Specific knowledge of potential losses in the mind of both parties when the contract is formed
What is the POL from Victoria Laundry vs Newman Industries?
They could sue for the loss of normal profits as that was a natural consequence of breach but not for the loss of the government contract as that was unknown to the defendants when the contract was formed
What case backs up Hadley vs Baxendale and the 2-stage remoteness of damage test?
Victoria Laundry vs Newman Industries
What is the POL from Koufos vs C Czarnikow (The Heron II)?
The claim for lost profits was seen as too remote to the CoA as it was unknown to the defendant that the sugar was going to be resold
However, House of Lords said that the fact the sugar was going to be resold was implied knowledge as the delivery was to a known sugar market, so it was a natural consequence of the breach
What case states that implied knowledge is enough to constitute the damage to be a natural consequence of the breach
Koufos vs C Czarnikow (The Heron II)
What is the POL from H Parsons vs Uttley Ingham?
The loss was considered within the remoteness of damage parameters, and they could sue for the damages suffered
What case states that ‘The loss was considered within the remoteness of damage parameters, and they could sue for the damages suffered’?
H Parsons vs Uttley Ingham
What is the POL from Jackson vs Royal Bank of Scotland?
The termination of the contract was a clear consequence of the bank’s breach of contract and confidentiality so it should have been contemplated that this would be the result of the breach
What case states that ‘The termination of the contract was a clear consequence of the bank’s breach of contract and confidentiality so it should have been contemplated that this would be the result of the breach’?
Jackson vs Royal Bank of Scotland