Contracts Flashcards

(75 cards)

1
Q

CONTRACTS: SOURCES OF LAW?

A

Common Law

  • Majority of Bar Questions: anything but sales of goods or leases.

UCC Art. 2

  • Contract is primarily for the sale of goods
  • Personal AND Commercial transactions

UCC Art. 2A - NYBE

  • Lease of GOODS + Sale of Interest in Real Property (NOT buildings/land)
  • Art. 2 Rules ALSO apply to 2A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

INTRODUCTION
What are the 8 types
of contracts question
on the bar exam?

A

8 General Types of Contracts Questions on the Bar

  • Enforcement & Remedies
  • Finding Existence of Agreement
  • Enforceability of Agreement Process (flaw in process)
  • Enforceability of Content of Contract
  • Dispute of Terms of Contract
  • Dispute over Performance of Contract
  • Enforceability Based on 3rd Party Performance
  • 3rd Parties Enforcing Agreements They Didn’t Make
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

IDENTIFYING OFFERS: In a Request for Offer where Delivery Terms + Price Terms sent in response, how is it interpreted?

A

Price Terms:

Request for offer containing delivery terms + prices sent in response = read together to equal an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IDENTIFYING OFFERS: Importance of Price Terms under the UCC - K for Sale of Goods?

A

Price Terms:

UCC for SOG: missing price OK; BUT vague price = NO offer (neg)

  • Requirements: B promises to buy from S all of the goods Buyer requires and S agrees to sell that amt.
  • Outputs: S promises to sell to a certain B all fo the goods Se produces, and B agres to buy that amt.
  • Request for offer containing delivery terms + prices sent in response = read together to equal an offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IDENTIFYING OFFERS: Role of Price Terms in Land Contracts, SOG and Request for Offer?

A

Price Terms:

  • C/L Contract for Land: must describe land & state price (Requirement)
  • UCC for SOG: missing price OK; BUT vague price = NO offer (neg
    • Requirments: B promises to buy from S all of the goods Buyer requires and S agrees to sell that amt.
    • Outputs: S promises to sell to a certain B all fo the goods Se produces, and B agres to buy that amt.
    • (Fillable by Court if Missing)
  • Request for offer containing delivery terms + prices sent in response = read together to equal an offer (Creates Offer alongside Other Terms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

IDENTIFYING OFFERS: Requirement of Price Terms in Contract for Sale of Land?

A

Price Terms:

  • C/L Contract for Land: must describe land & state price
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

IDENTIFYING OFFERS: Words/Conduct, Content + Price Terms?

A

IDENTIFYING OFFERS

  • Manifestation of commitment (words/conduct)
  • Create reasonable expectation of willingness to enter into contract.
  • Context relevant to existence of offer: Ads NOT offers (construed as merely invitation)

Content of Offers:

  • Vague Material Terms = NO Offer (“reasonable” “fair”)
  • BUT “all “only” “solely” (“all A’s cars”) often DO= offer; requisite certainty b/c exclusivity (requirement contract)
    • Reasonably proportionate demands in requirements contracts; NO unprecedented increases
  • Offeror is master: carefully read requirements of offer.

Price Terms:

o C/L Contract for Land: must describe land & state price

o UCC for SOG: missing price OK; BUT vague price = NO offer (neg)

  • Requirments: B promises to buy from S all of the goods Buyer requires and S agrees to sell that amt.
  • Outputs: S promises to sell to a certain B all fo the goods Se produces, and B agres to buy that amt.

o Request for offer containing delivery terms + prices sent in response = read together to equal an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

TERMINATION OF OFFER
What are the 4 ways which a valid offer can be revoked?

A

Termination of Contract Offer

  • Death of Party: offer dies w/party UNLESS option contract (promise not to revoke with consideration)
  • Lapse of Time: +1 month between offer and purported acceptance will terminate offer (unless explicit provision)
  • Revocation: unless irrevocable, offer can be revoked if both parties are aware (conduct/words) –> Express or Implied (good sold to another buyer)
  • Offeree’s Response: conditional acceptance, express rejection, counteroffer, C/L mirror image rule can terminate offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TERMINATION OF OFFER:
OFFEREE’S RESPONSE TO THE OFFER
What are the 3 possible offeree responses that can terminate an offer?

A

Termination of Offer B/c of Offeree’s Response

Counteroffers:

  • Statement will kill ( “I will only pay…”; BUT a question will NOT kill (“Will you accept…?”)
  • Option Contract: counteroffer won’t kill offer during period of option (unless there is detrimental reliance by offeror on offeree’s rejection)

Conditional Acceptance:

  • Clear statement of condition (“provided that” “so long as” “on condition that”) kills offer (MUST be absolutely clear conditional language)
    • o BUT conditional statement can be accepted by original offeror’s compliance w/condition
    • o 2 Merchants Rule: immaterial condition does NOT terminate

C/L Mirror Image Rule:

  • C/L acceptances must be mirror image of offer (Same terms)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ACCEPTANCE:
PERFORMANCE AS ACCEPTANCE - When does Part Performance constitute Acceptance?

A

Offer CAN Control Method of Acceptance: if it does, the method is the exclusive means of accepting the offer.

  • Part Performance As Acceptance:
    • Bilateral Contract: start of performance implies agreement to complete, so constitutes acceptance. So, part performance followed by **stop is breach. **
    • Unilateral Contract: acceptance only on completion so part performance followed by stop is NOT breach.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ACCEPTANCE:
PERFORMANCE AS ACCEPTANCE - When does Improper Performance constitute Acceptance?

A

Offer CAN Control Method of Acceptance: if it does, the method is the exclusive means of accepting the offer

Improper Performance as Acceptance:

  • Improper performance IS performance.
  • If performance = acceptance then there IS a contract and offeror can sue for breach.
  • Accommodation (Art. 2): If S tries to accommodate B by shipping improper item w/Express Acknowledgment of impropriety; NOT acceptance –> No Contract
  • Otherwise shipping improper item=acceptance+breach
    • But if S promises to ship before sending –> Breach can Occur
    • Accomodation only applies when Shipment used as form of Acceptance to Offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ACCEPTANCE:
PERFORMANCE AS ACCEPTANCE

A

Offer CAN Control Method of Acceptance: if it does, the method is the exclusive means of accepting the offer.

  • Unilateral Contract: requires explicit acceptance-only-by-performing language
    • Any conduct/statement OTHER than what is prescribed is NOT acceptance; so NO contract = NO breach
  • Part Performance As Acceptance:
    • Bilateral Contract: start of performance implies agreement to complete, so constitutes acceptance. So, part performance followed by stop is breach.
    • Unilateral Contract: acceptance only on completion so part performance followed by stop is NOT breach.

 Improper Performance as Acceptance:

  •  Improper performance IS performance.
  •  If performance = acceptance then there IS a contract and offeror can sue for breach.
  •  Accommodation (Art. 2): If S tries to accommodate B by shipping improper item w/express acknowledgment of impropriety; NOT acceptance –> No Contract
    • Otherwise shipping improper item=acceptance+breach
      • But if S promises to ship before sending –> Breach can Occur
      • Accomodation only applies when Shipment used as form of Acceptance to Offer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

REMEDIES: IN REM REMEDIES What are the 3 forms of
In Rem remedies for breach of contract?

A

Specific Performance

• Equitable Remedy: monetary damages inadequate
• Almost NEVER available to ∏; NEVER for employment: indentured servitude
Exceptions: (1) land tranxn; (2) unique goods; (3) injunctions (negative specific performance)

_Reclamation (Art. 2) _(excludes all other remedies)

  • Recover goods by unpaid S from B who was insolvent at the time of delivery of the goods; w/i 10 days of receipt; from B NOT 3rd party NOR proceeds if sold
  • Generally, NO right for unpaid S to get goods back (damages); must qualify for reclamation for goods

Entrustment

• Generally entrusting owner has NO right to recover goods from BFP (sue for conversion) (e.g. watch to jeweler for repairs and jeweler sells).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DAMAGES: MONETARY DAMAGES
What are the 6 types of monetary damage remedies for breach of contract?

A

(1) Expectation Damages

Benefit of Bargain: put Π in the position as if contract had been performed: (1) what would Π have w/o breach? (2) what does Π have after breach? (3) difference?

Lost Volume Seller: proveable lost profit from lost sale (+1 of the good breached on, so if S sells good, but loses profit)

(2) Punitive Damages

NEVER available; contract damages = compensation

(3) Liquidated Damages Provision

(1) Damages Difficult to Forecast AND (2) Provision Reasonably Forecasts Damages (flexible/NOT lump sum)

(4) Consequential/Special Damages (Specific to Particular Π)

Reasonably Foreseeable: Π can recover damages in parties’ contemplation (should have been) at time of contract

(5) Incidental Damages

Cost of replacement deal: ALWAYS recoverable

(6) Restitution (Quasi-K Remedy)

Not really part of K-Law

Restitution: Used to prevent Unjust Enrichment by providing value of benefit ocnferred (i.e. increase in ∆’s property value or value of goods B received)

Used When: 1) Party rescinds K & sues instead for restitution (only works if π has not fully performed) 2) Breach by P; 3) Unenforcable K 9∆ dies before performance in service K0; 3) No K but π conferred benefit on ∆ who knew of π’s reasonable expectation to get $ and would benefit if retain w/o pay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

FLAWS IN THE AGREEMENT PROCESS: SUMMARY
What are the 6 primary flaws in the agreement process that can render an agreement unenforceable?

A

Flaws in the Agreement Process

  • Lack of Capacity (infancy, intoxication, mental; CAN enforce; Exception for Necessaries; implied reaffirmation)
  • Duress (physical or economic – threat to breach existing contract when other party has no other option)
  • Misrepresentation Induces Agreement (including good faith/honest misrepresentations)
  • Mutual Mistake of Material Fact At Time of Agreement: mutual mistake about what something actually is (NOT its value) shared by BOTH parties at the time of agreement.
  • Statute of Frauds (SOF): prop. interest +1yr; services +1yr; goods +$500; lease+$1k tot.; debt of other w/i SOF, requires writing unless in exception (full perform svc contract; prop. payment+; already-delivered goods; judicial admission).
  • Lack of Consideration/Consideration Substitute: peppercorn AND no preexisting duty or past consideration; NYS: written substitute always OK)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ACCEPTANCE:
MAILBOX RULE - When does it apply and not apply?

A

Mailbox Rule for Contract Acceptance

Acceptance by mail is effective on deposit in the mailbox

  • ONLY Applies to Acceptance
    • Rule DOES apply when offeree sends acceptance (1st) THEN rejection(2nd): acceptance effective on deposit in mailbox, so rejection is ineffective.
    • UNLESS rejection arrives 1st & offeror detrimentally relies
    • Exception to Mailbox Rule for Acceptance: if rejection is sent first THEN acceptance is sent, whichever arrives first is effective.(Mailbox Rule Does Not Apply)
  • Does Not Apply When:
    • Offer stipulates that acceptance is not effective until received
    • Option K is involved (acceptance only through receipt)
    • Does not apply to revocation/rejection.
  • Note: If Offeror sends Revocation before Offeree sends Acceptance –> Result: No Contract b/c revocation terminates power of acceptance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

SOF: AGREEMENTS W/I SOF
What 8 types of agreements are w/i the SOF?

A

Statute of Frauds: Agreements Are Within SOF

  1. Transfer of Real Estate** **Interest in Land of MORE than 1-YR (366 days)
  2. Services K & Performance Impossible w/t 1 Yr of Agreement (NOT start of performance).
    1. “Lifetime” Deal:
      1. MBE NOT w/i SOF;
      2. NYBE: w/i SOF
  3. Sale of Goods +$500 (Or Lease of Goods +$1k total)
    1. Both Merchants & Non-merchants
  4. Promise to Answer for the Debts of Another (Suretyship)
    1. Express “if X doesn’t pay, I will” language
    2. Estate rep. personally paying estate expenses.
    3. BUT: main purpose exception if direct benefit to surety
  5. Promise in Consideration of Marriage (e.g. prenup)
  6. NYBE: Assignments of insurance policy; promise to name insurance beneficiary; commissions/finder’s fees
  7. Alleged K Modifications: ONLY when contract WITH alleged modification would come w/i SOF (courts ignore provisions purporting to require modifications in writing)
  8. Written Authority to Sign Real Estate Agreement (Equal Dignity Rule): ONLY if underlying agreement is w/i SOF

Note: SOF doesn’t req K to be in writing, only that 1 or more writings signed by **a PERSON **sought to be held liable on K reflect material terms (letter, receipt, check w/ quanity of goods could be sufficient)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

SOF: SATISFYING SOF
WITHOUT A WRITING
What are the 4 ways a party can satisfy the
SOF w/o a writing?

A

Satisfying SOF WITHOUT a Writing

  • 1) Full Performance of Services Contract
    • NOT partial=quasi-contract recovery ONLY
  • 2) Real Estate: Payment + Improvement OR Possession (2/3)
    • NOT full payment if no improvement/possession
  • 3) Already-Delivered Goods +$500 (rcvd/accepted)
    • Applies ONLY to portion of good already delivered by S to B (not the whole contract)
    • Exception: specially manufactured goods not suitable for resale if S substantially begins production
  • 4) Judicial Admission
    • Party asserting SOF admits contract in pleading, depo, testimony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

SOF: Exceptions?

A

Exceptions to SOF

  • Real Property: leases of one year or less; “part performance.”
  • One-Year: full performance.
  • Sale of Goods:
    • i) goods accepted by or paid for by the buyer;
    • ii) custom-made goods;
    • iii) judicial admissions; and a
    • iv) merchant’s confirmatory memorandum.
  • Suretyship: “main purpose” exception. NYBE: No main purpose exception.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

SOF: SATISFYING THE SOF
WITH A WRITING
What is required to satisfy the SOF WITH a writing for Sale of Goods, Lease of Goods, Real Estate, Services and Guarantees?

A

Satisfying the SOF WITH a Writing

  • Sale of Goods: Writing must include: (1) quantity; (2) signature of person asserting SOF;
    • BUT NOT price
    • 2-Merchant Exception: B/M sends signed letter to S/M confirming agreement, & S/M does NOT respond (later raises SOF); Result: B/M letter admissible. (Confirmatory Memo Rule)
      • Binding if B/M has reason to know of contents + No Objection
  • Lease of Goods (NYBE): (different from sales): writing must state: (1) it is a lease; (2) number of items leased; (3) length of lease, and (4) amount of lease.
  • Real Estate/Services/Guarantees: (1) all material terms: who and what AND signed by person against whom enforcement is sought.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Does adequacy matter?

A
  • *Consideration/Consideration Substitutes**
  • Consideration = bargained-for exchange*
  • Peppercorn: adequacy irrelevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Past consideration count?

A
  • *Consideration/Consideration Substitutes**
  • Consideration = bargained-for exchange*
  • No, Past Consideration NOT bargained for exchange
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Does a Pre-Existing duty count as new consideration?

A
  • *Consideration/Consideration Substitutes**
  • Consideration = bargained-for exchange*
  • Pre-existing duty id NOT new consideration (req. some new benefit/detriment), BUT:
    • TP Exception: promise to pay from 3rd party not part of original agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Do you need new consideration for a modification of Contract for the Sale of GOods?

A
  • *Consideration/Consideration Substitutes**
  • Consideration = bargained-for exchange*
  • Under UCC Art. II, new consideration is unnecessary for modification of a K for SOG but party must show GOOD FAITH reason for change. (e.g. agreement to ↑ price w/o consideration OK if GF present)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Is Part Payment consideration for a Due & Undisputed Debt?
* *_Consideration/Consideration Substitutes_** * Consideration = bargained-for exchange* * **Due & Undisputed Debt:** part payment is **NO consideration** * **BUT** *written promise* to pay debt barred by SOL is **Enforceable** w/o** **conisderation * Payment of sum smaller than debt due not sufficient consideration UNLESS New/Diff Consideration** ** * **(1)****paid Earlier or** * **(2) in Stock instead of cash**
26
CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Does Promissory Estoppel count as consideration?
* *_Consideration/Consideration Substitutes_** * Consideration = bargained-for exchange* * **Promissory Estoppel = Consideration Substitute:** though no consideration, ***Foreseeable*** and ***Detrimental*** **reliance** will make promise enforceable (w/o consideration)
27
CONSIDERATION: LACK OF CONSIDERATION/SUBSTITUTE - Exceptions to the Requirement of Consideration under the NYBE?
* *_Consideration/Consideration Substitutes_** * Consideration = bargained-for exchange* **NYBE (NY Law of General Obligations):** * If debt _due and undisputed_ --\> No consideration req. if ***Promise to Forgive*** in **signed writing**. * If debt is _time-barred_ --\> **Signed writing** is substitute for consideration (NYBE + MBE) * If it is a _contract modification_ --\> No consideration req. as long as ***Modification Embodied*** in **signed writing**
28
PAROL EVIDENCE RULE: Meaning and Exceptions
* *_Parol Evidence Rule_** * For integrated agreement, a court cannot consider parol evidence that contradicts that agreement.* * _Integrated:_ written final deal * _Parol Evidence:_ written OR spoken prior to or contemporaneous with writing _(not after)_ * _Merger Clause:_ highly persuasive only **_Exceptions: Parol Evidence Admissible_** * **Reformation (Scrivener’s Error):** NOT different deal; parol evidence to prove clerical error * **Rescission:** NOT different deal; parol evidence to prove flaw in process makes deal unenforceable. * **Explanation:** parol evidence explains vague terms * **Additional Words Rule:** parol evidence adds term to contract; ONLY for partially integrated agrmnt
29
UNENFORCEABILITY B/C OF CONTENT OF AGREEMENT: What areas raise public policy concerns? What is Unconscionability?
**_Unenforceable B/c of Content of Agreement_** **Illegality:** _Public Policy:_ * Covenants Not to Compete: (1) time limitation, (2) geographic limitation; (3) business need * Exculpatory Clause: usually negligence OK BUT NOT intentional torts/gross negligence _Unconscionability:_ * Oppressive terms; unfair surprises at the time of contract in substance/process
30
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS DELIVERY OBLIGATION AND RISK OF LOSS - Risk of Loss Rule on NYBE for Lease of Goods
**_UCC as Gap-Filler in Sales/Leases of Goods_** ## Footnote _For Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods:_ **(NYBE_)_ _Rules_**: For a **Lease of Goods,** owner/lessor *retains risk of goods* in hands of lessee, ***UNLESS _Finance Lease_*** (e.g. Bank buys, leases to lessee).
31
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS DELIVERY OBLIGATION AND RISK OF LOSS - Risk of Loss Rules - What Controls? Who is Liable? Who retains ROL in Shipment, Destination or Lease of Goods K? Any Wrinkles?
**_UCC as Gap-Filler in Sales/Leases of Goods_** _Risk of Loss in Sale of Goods:_ _Rule:_ 1. **Agreement Controls** 2. **Breaching Party is Liable** (EVEN if breach unrelated to loss) 3. **Shipment Contract:** _S_ retains risk until obligation complete 4. **_Destination Contract:_** 1. _Merchant S_ retains risk until B physically receives 2. _Non-merchant S_ has risk until she **tenders** (makes goods available to B: how, where, when to get goods) **Lease of Goods(NYBE)**: _owner/lessor_ retains risk of goods in hands of lessee, UNLESS finance lease (e.g. Bank buys, leases to lessee).
32
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS DELIVERY OBLIGATION AND RISK OF LOSS - Delivery Obligations in Common Carrier K for (1) Shipment or (2) Destination vs. (3) Non-Carrier K? Who has ROL?
**_UCC as Gap-Filler in Sales/Leases of Goods_** ***S’s Delivery Obligation*** in: **_Common Carrier Contracts_** * **_(1) Shipment-K:_** S obligation compete before receipt * (1) *goods to carrier*; * (2) delivery arrangements; * (3) notify B * _**(2) Destination-K**:_ S has obligation to get *goods to* B @ *specific destination *; “_FOB (Buyer’s City)_" * **Note:** FOB always followed by location and **Risk of Loss** ("**ROL**") pases to B @ _named location_. * If Seller's location --\> Shipment * If Buyer's location --\> Destination **_Non-Carrier Case_** * **(3) No Use of Common Carrier-K:**. B either picks up or S delivers depending on whether S is S=M or S≠M --\> * If **S/M** --\> ROL passes when B takes **physical possession.** * BUT If S≠M, ROL passes to B upon **Tender of Delivery. (Pay then)**
33
DISPUTE OVER AGREEMENT TERMS How is conduct relevant to contract interpretation? And what is the Order of Importance for conduct?
**_Conduct Can:_** * **Explain Words** in the Contract * **Fill Gaps** in the Contract * *_Order of Importance of Conduct:_** * *1. Course of Performance:** what parties have done under this contract? * *2. Course of Dealing:** what these parties have done in earlier similar contracts * *3. Custom & Usage:** what is the custom in the industry in similar situations?
34
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: When can Seller "Cure"? How? When is it available?
* **Cure:** S can CURE less-than-perfect tender **before contract Deadline Date** * S can cure by re-attempting **perfect tender** * **Availability:** If S can show that B had previously accepted imperfect tender, S will get opportunity to cure.
35
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: Perfect Tender?
**_Performance in Sales of Goods Contracts_** * _Perfect Tender:_ general standard for sales of goods; * **less-than perfect tender = breach** and B has option to **reject** and not **pay**
36
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: Contracts not subject to perfect tender? Rule and Principle?
**Installment Sales Contract** are **Not Subject to Perfect Tender** **Rule:** ONLY if explicit in contract language (NOT just b/c S made installment delivery); **Principle:** Continuing relationship = mistakes can be fixed in future
37
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: When can Goods no longer be Rejected?
* **Acceptance of Goods**: Once goods accepted goods CAN'T be rejected * **Req.:** reasonable time for opportunity to **inspect** and **payment before inspection** is NOT acceptance.
38
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: When is the Revocation of Accepted Goods permissible? What is the Buyer's Obligation to Pay? Consequences for Buyer?
* **GENERAL RULE:** B cannot revoke acceptance of goods * **EXCEPTION: Revocation of Acceptance OK when ** (1) something really wrong with goods(non-confirmity substantially impairs value) & (2) that was difficult to discover (latent defect). * **Note:** **Immediate act**=rejection; **Later act**=revocation * **B's Payment Obligation:** check OK by deadline, but S’s allowed to **refuse it (reasonable time allowed)** * **Consequence of Rejection/Revocation of Acceptance** * **Return:** Buyer can return goods to seller at seller’s expense * **Refund:** Buyer can get back any $$ paid for the goods * **Dmgs:** Buyer can get dmgs from seller for K-breach
39
PERFORMANCE DISPUTES IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT: Define Perfect Tender & Cure, Exceptions to Perfect Tender and General Rules/Exceptions Governing the Rejection/Revocation of Accepted Goods
**_Performance in Sales of Goods Contracts_** * _Perfect Tender:_ general std for sales of goods; less-than perfect tender (breach): B has option to reject and not pay * _Cure:_ less-than-perfect tender before contract deadline date: S can cure by re-attempting perfect tender * If S can show that B had previously accepted imperfect tender, S will get opportunity to cure. * _Installment Sales Contract Not Subject to Perfect Tender Rule:_ ONLY if explicit in contract language (NOT just b/c S made installment delivery); * Continuing relationship = mistakes fixed in future * _Acceptance of Goods:_ accepted goods **CAN'T** be rejected * Requires reasonable time for opportunity to inspect and payment before inspection is NOT acceptance. * _Revocation of Acceptance:_ (1) something really wrong with goods, (2) that is difficult to discover. * Immediate act=rejection; later act=revocation * _Payment:_ check OK by deadline, but S’s option to reject
40
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - Express warranties?
_**Express Warranties**:_ statement of fact or promises, NOT opinions (puffing) CANNOT be Disclaimed [Seller]
41
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - Define Implied Warranty of Merchantability
_**Implied Warranty of Merchantability**:_ goods sold by merchant who *regularly sells such goods,* must be fit for their ordinary purpose [Merchant]
42
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - Define Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
_**Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose**:_ if B has particular purpose known to merchant [Seller]
43
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - Do Leases have warranties?
**(NYBE)****Leases**do h**_ave_** warranties of fitness/merchantability**.**
44
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - How to disclaim warranties?
**_Disclaimer of Implied Warranties:_** * Magic Phrases: “as is” “w/all faults” * Conspicuous Writing of Disclaimer
45
UCC AS GAP FILLER IN SALE/LEASE OF GOODS EXPRESS & IMPLIED WARRANTIES - Scope of Limits on Remedies
* ***Remedies*** for BOTH implied & express warranties ***can be limited UNLESS unconscionable*** * Limitations on personal injuries in consumer goods is ***_prima facie unconscionable_***
46
EXCUSE OF CONTRACT B/C OF LATER AGREEMENT What are the 4 forms of later agreements that will excuse performance?
**_4 LATER AGREEMENTS that EXCUSE Contract PERFORMANCE_** **_Accord and Satisfaction:_** * New agreement between parties which agrees t**o discharge old contract if accord is satisfied instead.** * **Breach of Accord**: sue on original deal OR accord * Cashing check marked “paid in full” of disputed debt **_Modification → Substituted Agreement:_** * New agreement immediately discharges old contract, regardless of performance on modification **_Novation:_** * Mutually-agreed upon substitution of a new party to the contract: steps into the shoes of the existing party **_Rescission → Cancellation:_** * If neither party has accomplished full performance both parties can mutually agree to rescind contract.
47
PERFORMANCE OF C/L CONTRACTS - Define Anticipatory Repudiation
**_Performance of C/L Contracts_** * **Anticipatory Repudiation:** unequivocal indication of non-performance (not just a request for more money).
48
PERFORMANCE OF C/L CONTRACTS Substantial Performance & Partial Performance - General Rule and Role of Materiality & Damages
**_Performance of C/L Contracts_** * Substantial performance makes breach immaterial and non-breaching party must still perform (sue for damages) (e. g. use of Reading Pipe instead of Cohoe Pipe)* * **General Rule:** Any breach, even **immaterial breach = damages** * Partial performance **that is NOT substantial performance** is a breach so there is NO contract, and **non-breaching party does NOT have to perform** (pay) * BUT _breaching party_ can sue **in quasi-contract** for work completed. * Express divisible contract divides payment on per-unit basis, so --\> examine performance on per-unit basis.
49
PERFORMANCE: EXCUSE OF PERFORMANCE When is contract performance excused b/c of impossibility? Generally? UCC Art. II - SOG?
**_Impossibility_** * Increased cost is NOT an excuse * Destruction of necessary object (concert hall) IS an excuse * Death of necessary person is only an excuse where the person is unique (e.g. architect) **Frustration of Specific Known Purpose:** * At time of contract both parties know specific purpose for contract which is then frustrated: **Performance Excused** (e.g. rent apt to see parade which is then cancelled). **_Sale of Goods_** * **S has Risk of Loss:** destruction of goods excuses * **B has Risk:** destruction does not excuse (must pay) * **Fungible Good:** destruction of S’s quantity of fungible good NOT an excuse: can be replaced * **Commercial Impracticability:** may excuse (1) crop failures for specifically ID’able crop; (2) labor strike; (3) weather problems; (4) trade embargoes.
50
CONTRACT DELEGATION: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT DELEGATED TO 3RD PARTY NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT - General Rule, Exceptions and Breach + Liability
**_Delegation: Transfer of Duties_** _**General Rule**:_ contract can be delegated to 3rd party(3P) for performance **_Exceptions:_** * Contract prohibits delegation/assignment * Contracting party has specific skills/rep (artist). **_Breach:_** * Delegating Party **is liable** to other contracting party for breach by delegatee (3P). * Delegatee (3P) is **NOT liable** to **original non-delegating party** for breach, UNLESS delegatee assumes the duty by promising to perform.
51
ASSIGNMENTS Requirements, Prohibitions, & Invalidations, Rights & Defenses and Multiple Assignments
* *_Assignment: Transfer of Benefits_** * Assignor assigns contract benefits; obligor must perform* **_Requires_**: present (NOT future) lang. (“I assign” NOT “I promise to assign.”; NO CONSIDERATION; +$5k must be in writing _**Restrictions in Contract (**Prohibition vs. Invalidation)_ * **Prohibition: “not assignable”:** assignee w/o knowledge of prohibition CAN still enforce against obligor. * **Invalidation:** “assignments are void”: NO enforcement against obligor (regardless of knowledge) * ** C/L Limitation:** assignment cannot change obligor’s duties significantly **_Rights and Defenses:_** assignee steps into obligor’s shoes, so * Assignee CAN sue obligor for breach * Obligor has same defenses vs. assignee as vs. assignor * Payment to assignor OK until obligor knows of assignment **_Multiple Assignments:_** gift assignments **(no consid**) = last in time wins; but if consid, 1st assignee wins, but 2nd can sue assignor
52
CONTRACT FORMATION: When does a Quasi-Contract arise?
**_Contract Formation_** **_Quasi Contract:_** 2 Situations * No contract but ***detriment*** to one party * No ***express contract provision*** **_to deal_** with problem (e.g. what to do with deposit if contract is breached).
53
CONTRACT FORMATION: Implied in Fact Contract?
**_Contract Formation_** ## Footnote **_Implied in Fact_**: implied through party conduct (e.g. patient undergoes surgery after repeated promises of success by doctor
54
3RD PARTY BENEFICIARIES - What are they? Do they have Rights?
* *_3rd Party Beneficiary (TPB)_** * Promisee contracts with promisor that promisor will render some performance that will benefit TPB.* TPB must be **explicitly named** in the contract, or else she is ONLY an incidental beneficiary w/no contract right of enforcement **_Rights Vest in TPB_** **ONLY if** _TPB has_(1) knowledge PLUS (2.a) detrimental reliance OR (2.b) assent as requested **_Rights of TPB_** * TBP has contract law right of enforcement even w/o consideration w/ promisor. * However, TPB is subject to any defenses promisor has against promisee. * TPB also has NO right to sue promisee unless TPB is a creditor of promisee.
55
UNILATERAL VS. BILATERAL CONTRACTS: General Difference
Contracts usually _Bilateral_ (an exchange of promises: promise for a promise) _Unilateral:_ exchange of act for promise; **MUST clearly state that performance is the ONLY means of acceptance.**
56
VALIDITY: 3 Categories of Contested Contracts
**_Void Contract_** * _Void K_ has no legal efect from beginning and ***Cannot be Enforced* by either party.** **_Voidable Contract_** * _Voidable K_ is one that one or both parties may elect to avoid (ex. by raising a defense that makes it voidable like infancy or mental illness). **An aggrieved party *may elect to ENFORCE* a Voidable K** **_Uneforceable Contract_** * _Unforceable K_ is an agrmt that is otherwise invalid but may not be enforceable b/c of an extraneous defense to K formation (ex. SOL or SOF).
57
REVOCATION: Limits on Offeror's Power to Revoke
**_Irrevocable Offers_** * **_Options_:** Offeree gives consideration for a promise by the offeror not to revoke an outstanding offer. * Can be held open for as long as parties specify. * **_Merchant's Firm Offer under Art 2_:** If (i) merchant, (ii) offers to sell goods in a signed writing and (iii) writing gives assurance that it will be held open --\> Offer is not revocable for lack of consideration duringtime stated, or if no time stated,for reaosnable time (that cannot exceed 3 months). * 3 Month Limit ONLY applies to offers **W/O support by Consideration** * If consideration --\> prob Option and thus no time limit.
58
CONTRACT CREATION: 3 Basic Questions
**_CREATION OF CONTRACT_** When seeking to enforce a k or obtain damages ct must determine existing of a K **_Questions to Always Ask:_** 1. Was there **mutual assent**? 2. Was there **consideration** or substitute for consideraiton? 3. Are there any **defenses** to the creation of the contract?
59
CONTRACT BREACH: When does a Breach Occurs and What makes it a material/minor breach (NYBE)?
**_A Breach of K occurs when:_** * (1) an absolute_ Duty to Perform_, And * (2) _Duty_ has _Not been Performed_ **ONLY for NYBE: Know Whether Breach is MInor or Material** * _Amt of Benefit_ Received by Non-Breaching Party * _Adequacy_ of Compensation * Extent of _Part Performance_ * _Hardship_ to Breaching K * _Negligent or Willful Behavior_ of Breaching K * _Likelihood_ Breaching Party w/ _Perform Remainder_ of K **Nonbreaching K must show** (1) willing and (2) able to perform
60
CONTRACT BREACH: If purchaser of real estate is not ready or unwilling to perform, can seller keep down payment? If so, when?
Yes, if down payment constitutes a valid liquidated dmg clause **Req. for Valid Liquidated Dmgs Clause:** difficult to ascertain and amount must be a reasonable forecast
61
CONTRACT BREACH: Start of a Material Breach (NYBE)?
**_Material Breach Occurs:_** when non-breaching party does not receive ***the Substantial Benefit*** of bargain b/c of * **(a) Non-Performance** or * **(b) Defective Performance** **Ex:** H sells interest in Company-D for 5-yr employement K w/ Company-E for salary of $3K a month and special position. Company-E removes H from special positon. * **Benefit:** Salary and Position * Benefit not realized when Company-E removed H from position.
62
CONTRACT MODIFICATION: Consideration and Writing - Availability and Requirements?
**_CONTRACT MODIFICATION_** **Consideration:** CL reqs. modification w/ consideration but **UCC permits new/diff terms** to sales K **w/o consideration** **Writing:** Written can be modified orally but if SOG modified for $500 or more in w/t SOF --\> writing needed * **Only UCC Ks** can prohibit oral modification
63
PERFORMANCE: When Duty to Perform becomes absolute? - Condition vs. Remedies
**Analysis**: Ct looks to intent to determine whether condition or promise exist. If doubtful --\> Ct construe as promise. **_Absolute Promise v. Condition_** **Absolute Promise: **Commmitment to do or refrain form doing something. * If promise is unconditional--\> failure to perform to term is breac of k * **Result**: Gives rise to liability **Condition: **Condition is a promise *modifier*. **Tells you that** **If:** (1) X occurs or fails to occur OR (2) if X occurs party is released from duty to perform. * **Types:** Condition Precedent, Conidtion Concurrent; Condition Subsequent * NO breach of promise UNTIL promisor is under an immediate duty to perform (condition *may* create duty) * **Failure** of contractual provision that is only a **condition is not a breach** * But **discharges liability of promisor** whose obligation was based on the condition * **Result:** Relieves a part of the obligation ot perform **Remedy**: (1) If conditions fails/occurs + (2) one party fully/partially performed --\> recovery through unjust enrichment
64
DAMAGES: Contracts for Sale of Goods - Buyer's Damages
**_Buyer's Dmgs_** * Measured @ time B learns of breach* (1) S does not deliver or B reject goods/revoke accept: * **K-$** **(**MINUS) **MP-$** OR **Cost of Replace** * **[PLUS] Incident** or **Consequential** Dmgs * If any, **less** expenses save as result of S' breach (2) S delivers NonConforming Goods that B accepts: * **Value of Delivered Good** (MINUS) **Value of Good in K** * [PLUS] **Incident** or **Consequential** Dmgs (3) S antiicpatorily breaches K: * **MP-$ **@ _time B knows_ of breach (MINUS) * **K-$** **Note:** For **Consequential** dmgs, If S knew of B's general or particual req. and loss could not be covered then S liable
65
DAMAGES: Contracts for Sale of Goods - Seller's Damages ## Footnote
**_Sellers's Dmgs_** * Seller's Dmgs: Measured @ time for Delivery* (1) B wrongfully Repudiates or Refuses to Accept Conforming Goods: * (i) **MP-$** (@ Time & Deliv Pl) [MINUS] **K-$** * (ii) Resell Goods(RSP) gets diference of **MP-$** [MINUS] **RSP-$ ** * (iii) If S is *Loss Volume Seller* --\>* Lost Profits Rule* Applies then **K-$** [MINUS] **_$ to S_** * ONLY applies when S has **Unlimited Inventory** (ex. would have sold 2 widgets instead of 1) * If S' supply limited, then must use other two measures --\> (i) or (ii) (2) B Accepts Goods - Action for Price **Circumstance**: (i) B does not pay or (ii) B does not accept Goods and S cannot resell at Reasonable Price or (iii) Goods lost/damaged when risk of loss is on B * Action for **Full K-$**
66
DAMAGES: Contracts for Sale of Land/Real Estate Contract
**_Land Sale_** Contract Price [MINUS] Fair Market Value of Land
67
DAMAGES: Sale of Land; Employment & Construction
**_Employment Contract_** * Breach by Employer: **Full K-$** * Breach by Employee: **$ to Replace Employee** **_Construction Contract_** * Breach by Owner: B gets **profits from K-$** [PLUS] **Costs Expended** * Breach by Builder: **$ of Completion** [PLUS] **Reasonable Comp for Delay**
68
MITIGATION: Duty to Mitigate
**_Mitigation_ (Δ Affirmative Defense)** ***Π must mitigate or recovery (comparable benefit***) --\>* **Only reduces recovery and No Duty if Specially Mfg* **_Duty for Types of K:_** * _Employment_: RC to find same Kind/Rank/Grade * _K for SOG:_ S cannot bring Action a/gst Pf for Full K-# Unless no reasonable sell-$ or dmg/risk loss on B * _Mfgr:_ Stop Working but if completionn reduces dmgs --\> work * _Construction K:_ Stop Working
69
CONTRACTS: SOURCES OF LAW - The Common Law covers?
The **Common Law** covers anything but sales of goods or leases.
70
CONTRACTS: SOURCES OF LAW - UCC Art. 2A covers?
UCC Art. 2A covers leases of GOODS + Sale of Interest in Real Property (NOT buildings/land)
71
IDENTIFYING OFFERS: Offer includes a manifestation of.... a
72
DAMAGES: Buyer's remedy when seller does not deliver goods?
**Difference between K price and cost of replacement goods = COVER** ## Footnote **Req:** Reasonable K for substitute goods in **good faith** and **without delay** **Availability**: Not available if Buyer bore risk of loss
73
UCC DELIVERY: When a Contract says "F.O.B., Buyer's location," to which party and when does the risk of loss shift?
**This is a Destination Contract** * **Seller** bears initial **ROL until GOODs DELIVERED to Buyer's DOOR** * **ROL *shifts to* Buyer** as soon as carrier delivers.
74
UCC DELIVERY: When a Contract says "F.O.B., seller's location," to which party and when does the risk of loss shift?
**This is a Shipment Contract** * **Seller** bears initial **ROL until DELIVERY to CARRIER** * **ROL *shifts to* Buyer** as soon as Seller completes delivery obligations. * **Note**: * applies under the UCC, * Seller must deliver goods to licensed carrer +send docs + notify of hopment
75
UCC DELIVERY: F.O.B.
**F.O.B**.: Free on Board