Contracts concepts Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

Discharge of liabilities

A

1) when contract comes to an end
2) impossibility/frustration
3) when one party breach the contract
4) Substantially Alter the terms
5) where both parties agree to put an end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sec 62

A

Alteration of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sec 63

A

Dispense with or remit performance or increase time for performance. Changes made permanent

Central London case- lesser amount-final contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Damages for breach

A

Step 1: determine material or immaterial breach
Step 2:liquidated or unliquidated damages
Step 3: Reliance interest of expectation interest
Step 4: reasonably foreseeable - natural assumption or specific information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Angelia Television v Reed

A

expenditure incurred before contract could be claimed, so long as it was within the contemplation of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hadley v Bauxerdale

A

Test of remoteness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries

A

Bigger washing machine- expectation interest-special circumstances excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sec 73

A

Hadley case+ Kailash Nath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kailash Nath v DDA

A

If genuine pre-estimate fixed by both parties- liquidated damage paid
Only reasonable compensation is paid- set amount-upper limit
If actual damage proved-liquidation damage not provided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sec 56

A

Impossibility/frustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Taylor v Caldwell

A

The the base of contract affected/cease to exist- implied excuse in law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Satyabhrata Gosh

A

Develop land-government take over- just hard not impossible- sec 56 apply over will of parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Energy Watchdog

A

Force majeure clause- negate sec 56

Power purchase agreement- electricity from coal- price rise- not in force majeure-impossible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sec 27

A

Restraint of trade void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sec 37

A

Must perform duty or promise to perform

Partial completion not acceptable- cutter case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sec 38

A

When offer to perform rejected- Promi’s or does not lose rights under contract -subject to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sec 39

A

Promisor-refuse to perform wholly or disable himself- promisee May put an end to contract or allow to continue- any case can ask compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Sec 40

A

Can appoint agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sec 41

A

If obligation fulfilled by agent-can’t ask original party to complete it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Sec 46

A

Perform in Reasonable time if time not specified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Sec 47

A

Time not specified- deliver during business hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Sec 49

A

Duty of Promi’s or to request promisee for place and time when not provided

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Sec 50

A

Manner of performance and time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Sec 53

A

One party prevent other from performing, voidable at the instance of party prevented. Must pay damages to this party

25
Sec 55
Performance on time is of essence- failure- voidable
26
Essentials of misrep and fraud
1) false statement has to be made | 2) effective enough to make you give consent- but for test
27
Sec 14
But for test and free consent
28
Sec 19 explanation (2)
Unless induced to give consent- not misrep
29
Without free consent
``` Step 1) sec 14 - free consent Step 2) if essentials met Step 3) sec 19 -voidable Step 4) sec 64 Step 5) sec 75 ```
30
Sec 17
Fraud- can be by party or accomplice
31
Sec 17(2)
Fraudulent concealment- duty to speak 1) by law 2) concealment while negotiation 3) when truth become false
32
Sec 23
Unlawful consideration -void
33
Sec 24
Application 23- when one part of consideration legal but other illegal-no concept of sever ability- void
34
Sec 26
Agreements in restraint of marriage void
35
Sec 26
Agreement in restraint of marriage void. Except in case of minors where it’s helping the law
36
Sec 28
Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings void
37
Sec 30
Wager-void
38
Sec 20
Mistake of essential fact-void-no meeting of minds
39
Tarsam Singh v Sugmendar Singh
Land measurement case
40
Sec 21
Mistake of law not a remedie
41
Sec 22
Mistake on part of one party- not excused
42
Sec 16
Undue influence
43
Requirements of undue influence
1) one party must be in a position to dominate 2) party must use this position 3) to gain unfair advantage
44
Raghunath Prasad v Sanju Prasad
Add compound interest- figure multiply 11 times- Court ask to prove undue influence first before unconscionable
45
Subhas Mushib v Aaya Prasad
Grandfather gave away property-elder son sue-16(2) exhaustive of all positions
46
Sec 13
Consent- mirror image rule
47
Sec 14
Free consent vitiated
48
Sec 19
Voidability of agreement without free consent
49
3 solutions to issues arising out of contracts
1) Damages 2) Specific Performance 3) Restitution
50
Sec 15
Coercion
51
Steps for coercion
Step 1) look at act Step 2) whether it’s forbidden under IPC or threat to chattel Step 3) if yes, then coercion
52
Chikum Anvaris v Chikum Sushamma
Coercion-wide enough to cover 3rd party-husband threatened suicide
53
Askari mirza v Bibi Kishori
Threat to sue for crime actually committed is not coercion
54
Steps for economic duress
1) illegitimate pressure 2) substantive enough to make you give consent 3) no alternatives 4) if not for consent face economic duress
55
Sec 11
Who are competent to contract
56
Sec 68
Supplying given to incompetent person can be remembered
57
Necessity
1) look at parties situation at that point of life | 2) Necessary at the point of contract
58
Sec 12
What is sound mind
59
Privity check
1) Whether have right to sue upon contract | 2) whether moving consideration