Contracts-Examples-Becker-Regs Flashcards

1
Q

Express Contract

A

A contract formed by language, (oral or written) is an express contract.-If Ann promises to give Barb $10 if Barb will wash Ann’s car, the contract is express.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Implied-in-Fact Contract

A

A contract formed by(conduct)s an implied-in-fact contract.-Alex goes to Doctor and tells Doctor that he is sick. Doctor examines Alex and gives him an antibiotic. Alex and Doctor have entered into a contract for Doctor’s services even though no oral or written promises were exchanged. Their conduct implies their intent to enter into a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Quasi-Contract

A

Joanne gives Keith $10,000 as a down payment to purchase Keith’s house. The contract is oral and as will be discussed later, is unenforceable. Keith decides to back out. Joanne can recover the down payment in quasi-contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Advertisements-Genera/not offers

A

Steve places an ad in a local paper announcing the grand opening of his store and quoting the price of certain items. Such an ad is not an offer but is only an invitation seeking offers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Terms Must be Definite and Certain

A

Alex asks Bob to repair a broken window at Alex’s store within three days, at a price to be agreed upon later. The offer here will fail for indefiniteness of the price term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Communication to Offeree - No knowledge, no acceptance

A

To have the power to accept, the offeree must have knowledge of the offer. Therefore, the proposal must be communicated to him-Alex returned to Bob his lost briefcase unaware that Bob had placed an advertisement offering a $20 reward for its return. Since the offer had not been communicated to Alex, there could not be mutual assent. Hence, there is no contract and Bob is not obligated to pay the reward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Revocation by Offeror

A

the offeror can revoke an offer any time before acceptance by communicating the revocation to the offeree. Except as discussed below, this is true even where the offeror promises he will keep the offer open. -Maurice sent Schmit an e-mail offering to sell him a one-acre tract of commercial property for $8,000. Maurice stated that Schmit had three days to consider the offer and in the meantime the offer would be irrevocable. The next day, Maurice received a better offer from another party, and he telephoned Schmit, informing him that he was revoking the offer. This was an effective revocation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Revocation by Offeror-oral-written-conduct-sell to someone else

A

The revocation can be direct (e.g., a phone call to the offeree withdrawing the offer) or indirect, where the offeree receives correct information the offeror no longer wants to make the offer.-Alex offers to sell his car to Bob for $500. Bob tells Alex that he wants to think about it. The next day, Carol, a friend of Bob, drives over to Bob’s house to show Bob the car she just purchased from Alex. The offer to Bob is revoked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Irrevocable Offers 1

A

(1) Ann sends Barb an offer to sell a parcel of land for $60,000. The offer states that it will not be withdrawn for 60 days. Ten days later, Ann calls Barb and tells Barb that she is revoking the offer. The next day, Barb sends Ann a letter of acceptance. There is no contract because the offer was revocable (no consideration was given to keep the offer open). It was revoked before Barb accepted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Irrevocable Offers 2

A

The same facts as above, except the offer stated that Ann would keep the offer open if Barb promised not to sue Ann for 60 days on an unrelated dispute, and
Barb agrees not to sue. There is a contract here because (as will be explained later) forbearance to sue is valid consideration. Thus, an option was created, so Ann’s offer could not be revoked for 60 days; Ann’s attempted revocation was ineffective and Barb’s acceptance was effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Counteroffer-1

A

(1) Alex offers to sell Barb his car for $450. Barb says, “No.” The offer is terminated. If Barb later has a change of heart and tells Alex “I accept ,” Barb has at most made a new offer. No contract is created.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Counteroffer-2

A

Alex offers to sell Barb his car for $450. Barb says “No, but I’ll give you $425.” Barb has rejected and made a new offer through a counteroffer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Counteroffer-3

A

Alex offers to sell Barb his car for $450. Barb(asks)Alex if he’d consider taking $425. Alex says no. Barb accepts the offer for $450. There is a contract here because Barb’s initial question was not a counteroffer, but rather was a mere inquiry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Counter offer-Effective When Received

A

On January 3, Sam sent Ben a signed letter offering to sell his warehouse for $95,000. On January 5, Ben wrote Sam a letter saying that he would not pay $95,000 because that price was too high. On January 6, Ben was advised that similar property had recently been sold for $99,000. Ben immediately faxed Sam an acceptance of Sam’s January 3 offer. Ben’s letter arrived the next day. There is a contract because a rejection is not effective until received. The rejection here arrived after the offer was accepted by fax.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Termination by Operation of Law

A

Dee offered to sell Sue a parcel of land for $300,000. If either Dee or Sue dies before the offer is accepted, the offer will terminate by operation of law. However, if Sue paid consideration for the offer (thus creating an option contract), the offer will remain open for the period of the option (i.e., Sue or Sue’s estate could accept during the option period and a contract would be formed with Dee or Dee’s estate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Termination by Illegality

A

Lucky Lou offers Vegas Vernon a share in his casino business. Prior to acceptance, a law is passed banning casinos. The offer is automatically terminated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Generally)Effective upon Dispatch-the(Mai/box Rule

A

On February 1, Ann sends Bob a letter offering to employ Bob in Ann’s auto dealership. On February 5, Bob sends Ann a letter accepting the offer. On February 6, Ann has a change of heart and calls Bob to revoke the offer. On February 7, Ann receives Bob’s acceptance. A contract was formed here on February 5, when the acceptance was sent. Ann’s attempted revocation is ineffective because it came too late {after the acceptance was sent). The date Ann received the acceptance is irrelevant. Indeed, under the mailbox rule, a contract is formed on dispatch even if the acceptance letter is never received by the offeror.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Offeror May Opt Out

A

On November 1, Dee sent Steve a fax offering to sell Steve a vase. The offer provided that
an acceptance must be received by 5:00 on November 2. At 3:00 on November 1, Steve sent Dee an acceptance by overnight mail, but the acceptance did not reach Dee until November 3. There is no enforceable contract because the acceptance came too late. The offer provided that the acceptance had to be received by 5:00 on November 2, so the mailbox rule does not apply. .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elements of Consideration -Legal Value

A

Phil (promiser) agrees to sell Lori (promisee) his television set for $200. Phil’s promise (to sell) is supported by Lori’s detriment (the giving of $200). Note that consideration must be present on both sides. Thus, Lori’s promise (to give $200) is supported by Phil’s detriment (giving the TV).

20
Q

NeedQ-iave Monetary Value

A

(1) Father promises Daughter that he will give Daughter $500 if she names her first­born son after Father. Daughter does so. Naming the son after Father is valid consideration.

(2) Joanne promises Keith that she will refrain from suing Keith for 60 days on a valid claim if Keith promises to give Joanne an option to purchase Keith’s property for a specified price during the 60-day period. Both promises constitute consideration. (Joanne’s promise is known as a forbearance to sue.)

21
Q

Need(Not)Flow to Party

A

Alex promises Becky that he will pay her $10 if she promises to wash Cindy’s car. Alex’s promise is sufficient consideration to support Becky’s promise, even though Cindy will receive the benefit.

22
Q

Preexisting Legal Duties Generally Not Sufficient

A

(1) Carol is under a contract to sing at a concert for Mike. Carol decides she does not want to sing. To entice Carol to sing, Mike offers to pay Carol $5,000 more if she will sing. Carol agrees and sings. Mike does not have to pay Carol the additional $5,000. There was no consideration for the promise because of the preexisting legal duty rule-Carol was already obligated to sing.
(2) Smith offers a $10,000 reward for recovery of his kidnapped daughter. Jones, a police officer assigned to this case, recovers the daughter. Jones’s performance of his official duty is not sufficient consideration.

23
Q

Exception-New or Different”Consideration Given

A

The same facts as in example (1) above, except Carol offers to sing five minutes longer than she was originally obligated to. The modification is binding. -(1) Carol is under a contract to sing at a concert for Mike. Carol decides she does not want to sing. To entice Carol to sing, Mike offers to pay Carol $5,000 more if she will sing. Carol agrees and sings. Mike does not have to pay Carol the additional $5,000. There was no consideration for the promise because of the preexisting legal duty rule-Carol was already obligated to sing.

24
Q

“Past” or “Moral” Consideratio

A

A loose piece of molding fell from a building and was about to hit Sam. Sherry, seeing this, pushed Sam out of the molding’s path and was herself struck by it and seriously injured. Sam promised Sherry that he would pay her $100 per month for life. There is no consideration.

25
Q

Detrimenta/ Reliance/Promissory Estoppal

A

Richie Rich hears that his local hospital needs a new MRI machine. He calls the hospital and promises to donate $100,000 to enable the purchase. Richie’s promise is not supported by consideration; it is an offer to make a gift. However, if the hospital detrimentally relies on the promise by ordering an MRI machine, Richie will be bound.

26
Q

Undue Influence

A

Lawyer convinces Client, a senile person, to sell Lawyer Client’s personal property. An undue influence defense will likely succeed.

27
Q

Mutual Mistake

A

Alex and Bob enter into a contract for Alex to buy and Bob to sell Bob’s Rolex watch for $200. Before the sale is complete, the parties discover that the watch is a fake Rolex. Alex may avoid the contract.

28
Q

Nonexistence of Subject Matter-Contract(Void) ‘St-ole\/ 􀀄est-voye􀀄

A

Ann enters into a contract with Barb to purchase Barb’s car for $1,000. Unbeknownst to either party, the car was destroyed by a fire earlier in the day. There is no contract-the contract is void.

29
Q

Unilateral Mistake 1

A

Sue enters into a contract with Tyler to sell Tyler a parcel of land. Sue knows that the land cannot support a building taller than five stories, but most of the buildings in the area are only three stories. Unbeknownst to Sue, Tyler intends to build a 20-story building on the land. Tyler’s unilateral mistake (as to suitability of the land) is not a defense. However, if Tyler showed Sue the plans to the building before the sale and Sue remained silent, the defense of unilateral mistake is available.

30
Q

Unilateral Mistake 2

A

Phil is selecting bids from contractors for construction of a garage. One bid is substantially lower than the others (e.g., bid 1-$6,000; bid 2-$5,600; bid 3-$3,200) so that it is obvious that there is a mistake in the bid. The mistake will be a defense. Note that the bidder’s negligence is irrelevant.

31
Q

lllegality}-Contract Generally(VoidJ

A

Joe enters into a contract with Jim to murder Jason in exchange for 10 kilos of cocaine. The contract is void both because the subject matter (to murder) is illegal and the consideration on the other side (cocaine) is illegal.

32
Q

Promises Not to Compete EnforceableCif Reasonable)

A

Andy, an accountant practicing in a small town, sells his practice to Dee and agrees not to solicit former clients or practice within five miles of town for two years. The agreement is enforceable.

33
Q

Minors)May Generally Disaffirm Contracts

A

Bob, a 16-year-old, purchased a used car from Paul. Ten months later, the car was stolen and never recovered. Bob may disaffirm the contract and get his money back.

34
Q

Intoxication

A

Rick and Steve have a drink at lunch and then enter into a contract. Neither party is impaired. The contract is enforceable.

35
Q

Goods)for $500 or More

A

Ann offers to buy 200 books from Ben at $3 each, to sell in her store. This contract must be in writing. Subsequently, Ann discovers that she has room for only 150 books and so calls Ben and asks if her order can be reduced. Ben agrees. The contract need not be in writing. Conversely, if the contract were for 150 books and then was modified to 200 books, a writing would be required.

36
Q

Impossibility 1

A

Alex contracts with Phil to have Phil manufacture at his factory 1,500 wrenches. Fire then destroys the factory. Phil has the defense of impossibility because no one can make wrenches at Phil’s factory since it is now destroyed.

37
Q

Impossibility 2

A

Alex contracts to buy 1,500 wrenches from Phil, a tool wholesaler. Phil’s warehouse, full of tools, is then destroyed by fire. Phil must still supply Alex because performance is not objectively impossible; Phil can purchase more wrenches to sell to Alex.

38
Q

Parol Evidence Rule

A

Bob, a 16-year-old, is looking at cars on Lori’s used car lot. Lori tells Bob that if Bob buys a car today, Lori will wash the car once a week at no charge for a year. Bob selects a car and the parties sign a
fully integrated agreement setting out the parties, the price, the warranty, etc., but failing to mention anything about the washing agreement. Assuming Lori’s statement was not fraudulent (e.g., she actually intended to provide the washings when she made the statement but later changed her mind), Bob will not be able to introduce evidence of the statement in court. However, the parol evidence rule would not prohibit Bob from introducing evidence of his age, since that is not seeking to vary the contract’s terms.

39
Q

Compensatory Damages-Benefit of the Bargain

A

Bob contracts to build a garage for Barb for $5,000. Bob gets a more lucrative construction job and refuses to build Barb’s garage. Barb hires Jim to build a garage for $6,000. Barb can collect $1,000 from Bob.

40
Q

SWAP Exception-Specailly manufactured goods

A

Sam and Ben orally agree that Sam will specially manufacture a machine for Ben for $40,000. After Sam spends $30,000 to build the machine, Ben tells Sam that he no longer needs it. Even though the contract is oral, Ben is bound because the goods were specially manufactured.

41
Q

Non merchant Seller-Risk Passes on Tender of Delivery

A

Steve is not in the business of selling computers, but agrees to sell a computer to his neighbor, Bill, for $400. Bill gave Steve the $400. When Steve tendered delivery of the computer, Bill said he’d come back later to pick it up. Before Bill returns, the computer is destroyed by fire through no fault of Steve’s. Steve may keep the $400 because Bill had the risk of loss when the computer was destroyed.

42
Q

Merchant Seller-Risk Passes on Actual Delivery

A

The same facts as the example above, but Steve is a computer merchant. Steve must get a computer for Bill or pay damages because Steve still had the risk of loss when the computer was destroyed.

43
Q

Shipment Contract-Risk Passes on Delivery to Carrie

A

Brenda Corp. entered into a shipment contract with Sally Co. to purchase a used computer from Sally Co. It was understood that Sally Co. would ship the computer to Brenda Corp.’s main office. Even though Sally Co. must arrange for the shipment, Brenda Corp. bears the risk of loss during shipment, and if the computer is damaged while in transit, Brenda Corp. must still pay for the computer.

44
Q

FOB-Free on Board

A

Ann, an appliance retailer, agreed to purchase 100 radios from Stan, an appliance wholesaler. The contract provided that the goods were to be shipped to Ann by common carrier “FOB Stan’s loading dock.” If the radios are destroyed during shipment, Ann must still pay because she had the risk of loss. If the contract were “FOB Ann’s store” and the radios were destroyed in transit, Stan would bear the loss.

45
Q

Effect of Breach on Risk of Loss

A

Betsy orders 100 alarm clock radios from Stan “FOB Stan’s loading dock.” Stan sends 100 table radios. If the radios are destroyed in transit or shortly after the goods reach Betsy (before acceptance), Stan bears the risk of loss despite the “FOB Stan’s loading dock” term.

46
Q

Compare to Merchantability

A

Ben goes to “Sam the used car man” and tells Sam that he wants to buy a car suitable for towing his two­ton boat. Sam selects a Chevy Blazer for Ben. There is an implied warranty of merchantability that the Blazer will be fit for ordinary purposes, such as driving around town, and an implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose that the Blazer can tow a two-ton boat.

47
Q
A