Core Knowledge Theory Flashcards

1
Q

Core Knowledge theory

A
  • existence of core concepts
  • built-in or innate (not blank slate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

concepts

A
  • essential things we know about [blank]
  • used to group together objects (or events, qualities, or abstractions) that are similar in some way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why do we need concepts/categories?

A
  • simplify world
  • reasoning and inference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nativism

A
  • there are innate concepts
  • core domains = simple, starter (innate) concepts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

empiricims

A
  • there are not innate concepts
  • concepts are learned with general learning mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

core knowledge theory

A
  • core concepts are built-in or innate
  • nativism (ignore book’s term constructivism in this section)
  • core domains/selected over evolution just like physical structures:
  • physical objects (inanimates)
  • number
  • space
  • living things (animates)
  • language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theory-theory (wellman & gelman)

A

children have intuitive theories, each has an innate basis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Baillargeon’s landmark study

A
  • violation of expectation/”looking time”
  • perfected piaget’s idea of lack of mental representations
  • object permanence with 4 month olds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

inanimates: physical objects/ niave theory of physics

A
  • spelke and colleagues: physical objects:
  • move in continuous path (4 months)
  • take up space/can’t pass through other objects (4 months)
  • cannot move on their own (but animates can) (7 months)
  • nativists argue yes beacuse reaching/grapsing experience is minimal and visual acuity low before this point
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

all innate?

A
  • some time or experience required for full knowledge of gravity and support
  • violation detected at 6.5 months
  • before that age, the violation is not detected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Number

A
  • infants (and some other primates) discriminate objects and events by small numerosity
  • habituate to different arrangments of same number
  • 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, but not 4-5 etc.
  • “subitization”
  • innate constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

addition

A
  • 5 months olds
  • only up to 3+1 -> same innate constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

post-infancy

A
  • once again, these are “starter” concepts
  • how do we get past this limit?
  • and why don’t non-human animals?
  • language: each numerosity has a name
  • Piraha tribe of brazil: no number names and no counting or numerical reasoning beyond 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a (fully developed) theory of mind

A
  • knowing that others have intential actions
  • emotions desires
  • perceptions
  • beliefs
  • especially difficult when they are different from one’s own
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where does TOM begin?

A
  • innate knowledge of human face
  • newborns prefer faces to other complex stimuli
  • preference for general facial configuration? “top” heavy”
  • biological motion preferred over non-biological motion
  • newborns imitate facial expressions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

newborn imitation

A

from 2 days

17
Q

intentions/goals

A
  • reaching experiment (6 months) (woodward)
  • vilation of expectation
  • focusing on the intention of the hand
  • if you reach for object that they want or expected the human hand to reach for
18
Q

emotional understanding

A
  • emotion contagion in newborns
  • 3-4 months: discrimination of emotions
  • 7 months: ERP evidence of discrimination of basic emotions
  • understanding emotions when they differ from one’s own: social referencing (~10 months)
19
Q

social referencing

A

use somebody eles’s reaction to gauge a socail situation

20
Q

emotional contagion

A

automatic immitation of someone eles’s emotions (0-3 months olds)

21
Q

Desires: how early, if different?

A
  • bowl of goldfish crackers, bowl of raw broccoli
  • babies/toddlers like goldfish, hate broccoli
  • experimenter demonstrates her own likes (desires) and dislikes
  • experimenter asks child to give her one
  • two conditions: same desire (easy) vs. different desire (hard)
  • results in “different desire” condition: 18 mo old gives broccoli and 14 mo give goldfish anyway
22
Q

Perceptions

A

joint attention/gaze following (9-10 months)

23
Q

Apple hiding experiment

A
  • the child will always respond by hiding the apple behind their back or by hiding it on the side the experimentor hid from child
  • adult response by hiding in it on their side of screen
25
Perceptions
* apple behind screen: * fail at 2.5 * pass by 3
26
Beliefs: False belief Task
* false belief = different belief * "Sally-Ann task" * 3 yr olds = answer look in box * 4 yr olds = answering correctly -> look in basket because that was the last place sally saw it
27
3 yr olds pass Sally-Ann Task if
1. sally is in view the whole time, and 2. they are prompted to put sally where she wants to go rather than ask where she would go (Rubio.-Fernandez Geurts)
28
Looking time studies: onishi & baillargeon
* 15 mo olds look longer when reach is inconsistent with person's (false) belief