Corporations and Business 2 Flashcards
(34 cards)
Duty of Care
No special duty rule – Not an expert rule
Reasonable person under similar circumstances
Acting “in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation.”
* Duty to be Attentive to Corporate Business
* Duty to be reasonably informed, including duly deliberating
* Rational basis for decisions
Duty to be Attentive to Corporate Business
Minimum Requirements:
Reading internal reports and summaries of the corporation’s activities.
Duty of reasonable investigation:
Includes an obligation to act reasonably based on the information discovered.
Purpose: To stay informed about the corporation’s activities, finances, and performance.
Duty to be reasonably informed, including duly deliberating
More information than is needed to fulfill the duty to be attentive to corporate business.
Affirmative duty to learn more about the matters upon which the director will be voting.
Contextual: the “more” needed is enough so that the director can be reasonably informed enough to make a decision.
Duly Deliberating: Directors must actually discuss and consider the issues before them, instead of automatically approving matters without debate.
Rational basis for decisions
Duty on Directors to be rational actors
Contextual – viewed at the time the decision was made
Decisions must be:
* Made in good faith,
* Based on reliable information, and
* There must be a rational basis for the decision made.
Business judgment rule
A Rebuttable
Presumption of due care, which
Protection from personal liability for directors
Always analyze after the Duty of Due Care
Duty of Loyalty
The nature of the duty of loyalty is fiduciary.
The duty of loyalty requires the officers, directors, and controlling shareholders of a corporation to act putting the interests of the corporation before their own interests
Conflict of Interest
Practical Application of the Duty of Loyalty
Ratification – Fairness Factors
First, Full disclosure by the director or officer seeking approval
Then, evaluate:
* Adequacy of the proposed consideration
* Corporation’s need to enter into the transaction
* Financial position of the corporation
* Availability of alternatives to the proposed transaction
Effect of Ratification
Presumption of fairness and honesty
Party challenging a transaction bears the burden of proving that it was not fair and honest
Note: Fairness to the corporation is viewed at the time that the approval is sought.
Duty to Disclose Information
Affirmative duty to disclose material facts relevant to a proposed transaction before the board
Applies even to disinterested directors and officers
Failing to disclose such material information is also a breach of the fiduciary’s duty of loyalty
Source of the information is irrelevant; any credible source will do, provided the information is materially relevant to a transaction before the board of directors
Self-dealing
Defined: Where the officer or director has a personal interest in the transaction in which the corporation is involved.
Not Self-Dealing: Interests that are inside the corporation, that are aligned with those of the corporation.
Self-Dealing: Interests outside the corporation, that are aligned with the other company with which the officer or director’s corporation is doing business.
Ratification by Directors - to resolve self-dealing
Only disinterested directors can ratify
Full disclosure by conflicted director
Four Fairness Factors:
* Adequacy of the proposed consideration,
* Corporation’s need to enter into the transaction,
* Financial position of the corporation
* Availability of alternatives to the proposed transaction.
Corporate Opportunity Doctrine
Officers directors , and controlling shareholders must not take for themselves any business opportunity that could benefit the corporation.
See self-dealing
Business Opportunity that could Benefit the Corporation
The corporation must be financially able to undertake the opportunity,
The opportunity must be within the corporation’s line of business, and
The corporation must have an interest or an expectancy in the opportunity.
Disclose AND Decline
For a fiduciary to take advantage of a business opportunity for personal benefit, they must first:
Disclose the business opportunity to the board of directors of the corporation, and
The board of directors must decline to take the business opportunity for the corporation,
Director’s Right to Inspect Corporate Books and Records
Directors’ Right to Inspect:
Near Absolute – NOT Absolute
Purpose of near absolute right to inspect: to enable the director to perform his or her duties intelligently
Within this scope, analysis is done on a case-by-case basis as to whether it is necessary in order for the director to perform his or her duties intelligently
Can only be denied to prevent abuse
Shareholder’s Right to Inspect Corporate Books and Records
Shareholders’ Right to Inspect:
Limited to matters reasonably related to their interest as shareholders
including possible corporate wrongdoing
With a proper purpose, the corporation must provide access to all documents in the corporation’s possession, custody or control necessary to satisfy that proper purpose
A shareholder must be a stockholder of the corporation at the time of:
* the demand for inspection, and
* the transaction in question
Rule 10b-5 - Enforceability
Can be enforced by:
Civil enforcement action by the Securities Exchange Commission – No statute of limitations
Criminal charges by the U.S. Department of Justice – No statute of limitations
Civil litigation by private parties – Within 2 years from the discovery of the violation, but not more than 5 years after the violation is committed
Rule 10b-5 - Actionable
Interstate Commerce: means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of anynational securities exchange
Fraud
Materiality: The untrue statement or omission must be about the sort of information that a reasonable investor would consider significant in making an investment decision.
Scienter: the defendant’s specific knowledge that their statement or omission is untrue and their awareness of its likelihood of influencing investor behavior.
Standing: (1) completed sale/purchase; and (2) “in connection with”
Causation: Transaction causation and loss causation
Damages: Liquidated (i.e., able to be reduced to a specific dollar figure)
Rule 10b-5 - Rule and elements
Rule 10b-5 prohibits officers and directors, directly or indirectly, from
(1) omitting to state a
(2) material fact necessary to make a statement not misleading, in light of the circumstances under
which the statement containing the omission was made, where
(3) the omission is made with scienter and
(4) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. (misstatement “in connection with” buy/sell)
Rule 10b-5 - Types of Liability
Primary Liability – primary participants
Secondary Liability
* aiders and abettors
* control persons
Rule 10b-5 - Participants
Primary Participants
* Material misrepresentation, and * Material omission
- - - Substantial Factor – Was the defendant a substantial participant in making the material statement or material omission?
- - - Bright Line - The statement or omission must be attributed to the defendant or otherwise is identified as having been made by the defendant
* Committing a manipulative act
Rule 10b-5 - Participants - Secondary
Aider and Abettor – Not a primary participant, BUT – Involved in the creation, distribution, or publication of a statement or omission that violates Rule 10b-5.
Control Person – Must have actually exercised general control over the activities or operations of a primary participant, AND – Must have had the power or ability to control the specific transaction or activity that led to the violation.
Disclose or Abstain - Scienter
An insider who possesses material, non-public information must either:
(a) disclose that information before trading in that company’s stock; or
(b) if disclosure is not possible or it would be improper, abstain from trading in that company’s stock.
Scienter is required to violate Rule 10b-5, including the disclose or abstain rule.
The defendant is only liable for actions knowingly taken, for trades knowingly made while possessing material, non-public information.