Corps 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Formation Issues: There are 3 SCENARIOS under which …:

[Co properly formed?
If so, PCV?]

A

a Co can EXIST:

1) De Jure Co
2) De Facto Co
3) Co by Estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A DE JURE Co is formed when ..: =>Result?

A
INCORPORATORS SIGN & FILE the AoI w/ the SoS. 
[AoI needs:
1) NAMES of O/D/& Agent 
2) Describe Co's PURPOSE and Duration & 
3) state its Capital STRUCTURE.]
In a DE JURE Co, the D/O/ & SHs are generally immune from PERS. LIAB. for Acts of the Co
(b/c Co =Separate Legal Entity 
=>LIMITED LIABILITY).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

*De Facto Co, which is ABOLISHED in many states:

A

Even if a de jure formation fails, a Ct may use the equit. doctrine of DE FACTO corp. formation if there’s:

1) relevant INCORP. STATUTE
2) COLORABLE GF ATTEMPT to comply w/ it &
3) the Co has EXERCISED any corporate PRIVILEGES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Co by Estoppel, which is ABOLISHED in many states, …:

Typically applies only to CONTRACT Vs:
=> DoesNOT help TORT V.

A

Altern., Ct may find a Co by ESTOPPEL where a 3P who TREATS an Entity LIKE a Co is estopped from denying the Co status to avoid liability.
Estopps: 1) K Ps +2) Co itself
[from asserting invalid formation as DFN 2avoid K].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bylaws:

A

1) Amended & REPEALED by:
The SHs
(sometimes: by the Bd).

2) If Bylaws conflict with AoI:

=> AoI control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pierce Corporate Veil: GR +When?:
(to make SH liable for Co’s dDebts)

[Cf. LLC:
Cts won’t pierce LLC for lack of formalities, b/c LLC STATUTES require LESS FORMALITY than for Co].

A

GR: MGT & SH areNOT PERS. LIABLE for corp. oblig. b/c Co is its own legal entity. [+Parent too]
BASIS for PIERCING the VEIL of NONliab. to hold SHs liable: is to PREVENT FRAUD or INJUSTICE
IF the Co was:
1) UNDERcapitalized at Formation
2) merely an ALTER EGO of its SH
3) Or formed to commit a FRAUD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Basis for PIERCING the VEIL (Details):
+*Cts. will allow a TORT V…:

[Cf.: Corp. NonLiability does NOT shield a person (D/O) from liability for ooScope (=his OWN) Torts]

A

1) UNDERcapital.: (=NOT ADEQ. FUNDED to meet FORES. LIAB.
[SH loans doNOT count.]
2) ALTER EGO: by TREATING Co & Pers. ASSETS as interchangeable.
[SHAM: O/D=Same /Commingle funds. CCA: SLOPPY Admin.].
*Cts. will allow a TORT V. to reach the PERS. assets of a SH who
1) SERIOUSLY IGNORED Formalities
2) AND some INJUSTICE Occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
*Pre-incorp. K. LIABILITY:
Trigger / Definition: 
Subscriber makes written offer to buy stock FROM a Co NOT YET formed. 
Note: Pre-incorp. offer:
is IRRevocable for 6 mts.
A
The Co is liable: 
when it ADOPTS by:
1) expr. Bd ratification or 
2) impl. by accepting the BEN of the K. 
PROMOTER is liable: 
always, unless
1) K expr. RELEASES him 
2) OR there's a NOVATION.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Secret Profits:

[++Discuss: CL, 10b-5, & 16b
if Stock changes hands!]

A

1) PROMOTER canNOT make SECRET PROFITS by selling Property to the Co!
2) Deals must be DISCLOSED & FAIR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
**SELF-Dealing: Transactions ..:
([Dir buys/sells from/to the Co 
=> inherent c.o.i.]):
\++Dirs CAN set their own Compensation, but it must be REAS.  
CA: Breach of DoL if:
Excessive =WASTE of corp. ASSETS.
A
b/w the Co & a Dir, 
who has a PERS. C.o.I., 
MUST be SET ASIDE, UNLESS:
1) Ct Deems the DEAL FAIR 
2) Or Dir shows!: all MAT. FACTS were DISCLOSED & 
3) Tx APPROVED by either: 
a) DISinterested maj. of the Bd 
b) Or the maj. of SHs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Directors’ DoL (BoP on D)
**A Dir owes the Co & Each SH a DoL to 1) act in GF and 2) in the Co’s best interest, which includes a duty to not engage in … +Remedy:

(If C.o.I. =>No BJR applies!)

A

1) INSIDER Trading
2) SELF-Dealing (see)
[at the expense of Co]
3) USURPING a Co Opport.,
CA1: NOT in LINE of biz.
[=no reas. interest/Expectancy]
CA2: DISCLOSED & WAITED for the Bd. to DELCINE the Opport.
[=>CT /Sell to Co @COST]
4) & COMPETING w/ the Co
[=>1) DMG or 2) INJ.]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WHICH Dir. are liable for Bd action?+CA
[*ULTRA VIRES Act =ooSCOPE of AoI’s biz. PURPOSE:
ML: D/O =Competent=>K =VALID.
=>1) Co may Sue O/D for DMG.
2) SHs: can Seek an INJ.
++IMPROPER LOANs:
SOX prohibits loans to EXECUTIVES in large Co]

A

ALL Bd. members PRESENT in mtg. are PRESUMED to AGREE
=PERS. liable. 4 the D’s breach.
CA: Dir. who:
1) DISSENTED in writing [minutes]
2) was ABSENT
3) GF DFN: reas. relied on REPORTS by EXPERTS
[Competent +Non-N. selected: EE, O, Profess’l, Committee].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

GR: O/D SUED in such CAPACITY is entitled to …+CA:
[NO CAP on DMGs: to LIMIT Dirs’ PERS. liab. IF:
1) BREACH of DoL [DoC OK]
2) INT. MISCONDUCT
3) Or WRONGFUL FINANCIAL BENEFIT ]

A

REIMBURSEMENT for all EXPENSES incurred for any corporate purpose IF: D/O PREVAILS in defending.(=MANDATORY indemnification)
CA: If UNsuccessful:
PERMISSIVE: Co MAY indemnify IF: O/D Acted in GF.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

[**CONSIDERATION paid to Co for issued stock. +CA:
Trigger: Description of the Pr used to PAY for STOCK TO BE ISSUED by Co.]
VALID CONSIDERATION:

A
Co may ACCEPT any:
1) INTANGIBLE Pr
2) TANGIBLE Pr 
3) & PAST services rendered to the Co. 
CA: 
1) FUTURE Services 
2) UNsecured Promissory Notes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

[AMOUNT of Valid CONSIDERATION +CA:
&
REMEDY:]

A
1) PAR stock MUST be sold at par price 
[=MIN. value, set in AoI]
ELSE (if issued < par value =>) Watered Stock.
REMEDY: C'ors can ELECT to sue for water the Dirs=Co, who auth'd issuance, OR the (non-BFP) Buyer.
2) TREASURY stock: 
can sell at any price. 
3) “No Par”stock 
(=any STATED value, set by Bd).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Directors’ DoC (burden on P)

=> BJR applies! [=Discuss AFTER DoC]

**Dir. owes Co a DoC to act … :

A

1) in GF
2) in a MANNER D Believes is in the Best interest of Co
3) with DUE CARE a RPP would exercise w.r.t. her own affairs.
[=Non-N. =reas. INFORMED /investigate*].
But Dir. is LIABLE for Breach IFF: it causes a LOSS to the Co.

17
Q

Defense of **BJR:
BUT the Dir. may be Protected by the BJR. Courts will not 2ndGuess a biz. decision to hold Dir. PERS. liable if the Dir. …: +EVEN if BJR fails, …:

[+AoI may LIMIT Pers. LIABILITY to SH/Co for $DMG.
CA: ILLEGAL /INT. Misconduct]

A

1) acted in GF,
2) was REAS. INFORMED
[did HW /analyzed], &
3) had a RATIONAL BASIS for his decision
[CA: GrossN., Reckless]
EVEN if BJR fails, Dir has DFNs to PERSONAL Liability if:
1) SH RATIFY a Transaction, or
2) GF rel. on EXPERTS’ Reports (non-N. selected).