Court Cases Flashcards
Government (28 cards)
Marbury v Madison
Question: Do the plaintiffs have a right to receive their commissions?
Answer: The court has the power to declare laws passed by congress unconstitutional.
McCulloch v Maryland
Question: Does congress have the power to establish a national bank?
Answer: Congress has the power to create a national bank and states cannot tax the federal government.
Dred Scott v Sanford
Question: Does the constitution apply citizenship rights to people of African descent?
Answer: African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States and therefore did not have the right to sue federal court.
Plessy v Ferguson
Question: Are state laws requiring racial segregation constitutional?
Answer: Racial segregation laws were constitutional as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal.
Schenck v US
Question: Did Charles Schenck’s actions of disturbing leaflets against the military draft during World War I violate his first amendment right?
Answer: The Espionage Act of 1917 was constitutional. The court established the “clear and present danger” test, which limits free speech.
Korematsu v US
Question: Did the president and congress go beyond their war powers by implementing exclusion and restricting the rights of Americans of Japanese descent?
Answer: The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was constitutional.
Brown v Board of Education
Question: Did racial segregation in public schools, based on the “separate but equal” doctrine, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment?
Answer: Racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The ruling overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
Mapp v Ohio
Question: Can evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure by state police be used against a defendant in state court?
Answer: In favor of Mapp, the high court said evidence seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions.
Baker v Carr
Question: Did the supreme court have jurisdiction over questions of legislative apportionment?
Answer: Federal courts do have the jurisdiction to hear cases regarding legislative apportionment that violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Engel v Vitale
Question: Do school-sponsored nondenominational prayers in schools violate the Establishment Clause of the first amendment?
Answer: Yes, the government cannot establish a state religion.
Gideon v Wainwright
Question: Are states required to provide a person charged with a non-capital felony with the assistance of counsel if that person cannot afford to hire an attorney?
Answer: The 6th amendment requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.
Miranda v Arizona
Question: Is interrogating individuals without notifying them of their rights to counsel and protection against self-incrimination a violation of their 5th amendment rights?
Answer: Miranda’s confession could not be used as evidence in a criminal trial because of the fifth amendment.
Tinker v Des Moines
Question: Did the school district’s policy of prohibiting students from wearing armbands, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the student’s 1st amendment rights?
Answer: Public school officials cannot censor student expression unless they can reasonably forecast that the speech will disrupt school.
New York Times V United States
Question: Was the constitutional freedom of the press subordinate tot eh executive branch’s need to maintain the secrecy of information?
Answer: The government cannot use vague claims of national security to suppress the publication of information that was in the public interest.
Wisconsin v Yoder
Question: Did Wisconsin’s law requiring children to attend school violate the First Amendment’s protection of religious freedom?
Answer: Wisconsin’s compulsory school attendance law was unconstitutional as applied to the Amish, as it violated their first amendment right to free religion.
Roe v Wade
Question: Did the U.S. Constitution protect a woman’s right to have an abortion?
Answer: Unduly restrictive state regulation of abortion is unconstitutional.
United States v Nixon
Question: Can the president use executive privilege to withhold information from a judicial subpoena during a criminal investigation?
Answer: A claim of presidential privilege as to materials subpoenaed for use in a criminal trial cannot override the needs tot he judicial process
Regents of the University of California v Bakke
Question: Does a university’s affirmative action policy that uses racial quotas in its admissions process violate the Equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?
Answer: Colleges can consider race as a factor in admissions but could not use racial quotas.
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier
Question: Can school officials censor content in a school-sponsored student newspaper, specifically when the content is deemed inappropriate?
Answer: Schools can limit student speech that goes against their educational mission.
Texas v Johnson
Question: Does burning an American flag constitute protected symbolic speech under the first amendment, can the government prohibit flag burning?
Answer: Burning the American flag is a form of protected symbolic speech under the first amendment, meaning that a state cannot prohibit flag burning.
Shaw v Reno
Question: Did the creation of racially gerrymandered electoral districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment?
Answer: Restricting based on race violated the Equal protection Clause of the 14th amendment.
U.S. v Lopez
Question: Does congress have the authority under the Commerce Clause of the constitution to pass the gun-free school zones act?
Answer: The gun-free school zones act of 1990 was unconstitutional. The court ruled that congress over-stepped its authority under the Commerce Clause.
Bush v. Gore
Question: Does the Florida Supreme Court’s method for recounting ballots in the 2000 presidential election violate the Equal Protection Clause?
Answer: The Equal protection clause guarantees to individuals that their ballots cannot be devalues by “later arbitrary and disparate treatment”.
District of Columbia v Heller
Question: Does the second amendment protect an individual’s right to possess a firearm for self-defense within the home?
Answer: The Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes.