Court Cases Flashcards

(20 cards)

1
Q

What was the significance of Marbury v. Madison (1803)?

A

Created judicial review, allowing the Court to strike down laws that conflict with the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) confirm?

A

Confirmed implied powers (Necessary & Proper Clause) and barred states from taxing the federal government.

“The power to tax is the power to destroy.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What authority did Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) grant Congress?

A

Gave Congress exclusive authority over interstate commerce, curbing state monopolies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)?

A

Held that enslaved persons and their descendants could not be citizens; struck down the Missouri Compromise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) uphold?

A

Upheld state-mandated segregation under the doctrine of ‘separate but equal.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What test did Schenck v. United States (1919) introduce?

A

Introduced the ‘clear-and-present-danger’ test; speech that poses a real threat loses First-Amendment protection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Korematsu v. United States (1944) approve?

A

Approved Japanese-American internment, showing deference to political branches on national security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the outcome of Brown v. Board of Education (1954)?

A

Rejected Plessy and declared segregated public schools ‘inherently unequal,’ launching modern civil-rights litigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Mapp v. Ohio (1961) apply?

A

Applied the exclusionary rule to the states; illegally seized evidence can’t be used in state courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What right did Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) guarantee?

A

Guaranteed state-funded counsel for felony defendants who cannot afford a lawyer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What requirement did Miranda v. Arizona (1966) establish?

A

Required police to give Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation; statements are inadmissible without a knowing waiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) protect?

A

Protected student symbolic speech; students don’t shed their rights at the schoolhouse gate unless it substantially disrupts class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did New York Times v. United States (1971) bar?

A

Barred prior restraint of the Pentagon Papers; imposed a heavy burden on government to censor the press.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What right did Roe v. Wade (1973) recognize?

A

Recognized a woman’s qualified right to terminate pregnancy under the Due Process ‘right to privacy.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What limitation did United States v. Nixon (1974) impose?

A

Limited executive privilege; the president must comply with judicial subpoenas in criminal cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Regents of U.C. v. Bakke (1978) significance

A

Struck down rigid racial quotas but allowed race as one plus factor in admissions.

Foundation of affirmative-action doctrine.

17
Q

Texas v. Johnson (1989) ruling

A

Flag-burning is protected symbolic speech; governments can’t ban expression just because it offends.

18
Q

United States v. Lopez (1995) impact

A

First modern case to curb the Commerce Clause; Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded congressional power.

19
Q

Bush v. Gore (2000) outcome

A

Stopped Florida’s recount; equal-protection concerns decided the presidential election.

20
Q

Citizens United v. FEC (2010) decision

A

Lifted limits on independent corporate and union spending in elections as protected political speech.