Covalent and Ionic Radii, Effective Nuclear Charge, Orbital and Promotion Energies Flashcards
(32 cards)
What is the Covalent radius?
How can we calculate the distance for new bond?
However what must we take into account?
- Covalent radius is the defined as half the length of a symmetrical homonuclear bond (X-X)
- Knowing the radii of two elements we can calculate distances for new bonds
- Generally works well, but we must take into account electronegativity differences
What is the metallic radius?
Is the equivalent distance between ions in a metal lattice
For some elements like helium and neon the covalent radius is difficult to measure due those elements not having any bonds
How is this overcome?
through measuring the van der Waals radius
What is the ionic radii?
equivalent distance between positive cations and negatie ions
But additionally increase with increasing -ve charge and decrease with increasing +ve charge
How does the size of the atomic radii change across the p-block from left to right?
- from left to right, the size of the elements decreases across a period (angstrom radii numbers shown)
- so flourine is smaller than boron
What is 1 Angstrom (Å) in pm?
1 Angstrom = 100ppm
What do Slater’s rules (Zeff) recognise?
the outermost electrons feel a nuclear charge which is less than the actual nuclear charge, because of shielding effects from other electrons
When using Slater’s rules to work out effective nuclear charge, for a particular electron in a ns or np orbtial
(i) Each of the other electrons with the same principle quantum number in the same (ns, np)(nd) group contributes =
(ii)Each of the electrons in the (n-1) shell contributes =
(iii) Each of the electrons in the (n-2) or lower shells contributes =
(i) 0.35
(ii) 0.85
(iii) 1.00
When using Slater’s rules to work out effective nuclear charge, for an electron in a nd or nf orbital
(i) how much does each of the other electrons in the (nd, nf) group contribute
(ii) how much does each of the electrons in a lower group than the one being considered contribute
(i) 0.35
(ii) 1.00
Calculate the shielding constant, s, for the 2p electron in a boron atom, and the effective nuclear charge, Zeff, that this electron experiences
B: 1s² 2s² 2p¹
Zeff = Z - S
S = 2(0.35) + 2(0.85) = 2.4
5-2.4 = 2.6
Calculate the shielding constant, s, for the 4p electrons in an atom of germanium, and the effective nuclear charge, Zeff, that this electron experiences
Ge: [Ar] 3d¹⁰ 4s² 4p²
= 3(0.35) + 18(0.85) + 10(1)
s = 26.35
zeff = 32 - 26.35
= 5.65
Calculate the shielding constant, s, for the 3d electron in an atom of nickel, and the effective nuclear charge, Zeff, that this electron experiences
Ni: [Ar] 3d⁸ 4s²
= 7(0.35) + 18(1.00)
S = 20.45
= 28-20.45
= 7.55
How does effective nuclear charge change going accross the periodic table from left to right?
- Effective nuclear charge increases substantially across the periodic table
- Hence explaining why F has such a high ionisation energy (hard to remove that first proton due to high amounts of nuclear charge felt) and also a smaller atom
Slater’s rules predict an increase in nuclear charge going down the group
Why is this incorrect
- Because we know the ionisation energy decreases on descending a group
- Slater’s rules are simplistic: they do not account for distance from nucleus or penetration (nodes, varying likelihood of finding an electron etc)
What are the s- vs p-electrons energies like
- s-electron energy are lower in energy due to being closer to the nucleus hence more stabilised by positive attraction force
- p-electron energies are higher due to being less pentrating and hence less stabilised by positie attractive force
Within a group, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energies increases (become less negative/less stable) from top to bottom and the s-p separation decreases
Why is this?
Higher principal quantum number shells so electrons further away from the nucleus
s and p energies decrease across a period, but more for s
Why?
- Zeff for s increases, resulting in the s-electrons becoming much more stable than p
- (this is why the sigma and pi MOs swap around from N₂ to O₂ (s-p mixing)
the 4s orbital energies for As, Se, Br and Kr are lower than expected
Why?
related to d-block contraction
Increased Zeff from 3rd period which has a strong affect on 4s (penetration to inner core)
Describe the trend in Promotion Energies
General increase in energies required to promote e- from ground state to excitied state going down a group
e.g. s²p² → s¹p³
What two thing affect promotional energies
- The energy difference between orbitals (this increases down a group)
- The effect on the energies of other electrons in the shell which have not been promoted and now experience less electrostatic repulsions
Why do Ga and Ge deviate from the trned of promotional energies
- 4p row immediately proceded by full 3d row so lower than expected s orbital energy - d-block contraction
Why are the promotional energies for Tl and Pb so unexpectly high?
Tl and Pb have highest promotional energies indicating that the reorganisation energies are substantial (relates to rehybridiation)
(when one electron moves the others do not stay static but their energies change due to electron correlation)
Why can the first row not expand its octet?
Because there are only s and p orbtials which are available
How do the properites of the p-block compound affect the structure of the oxide it forms
Tl(I), Pb(II) and Bi(III)
- All metals (minus Sn) will form an ionic structure with some covalent character
- All metalloids (plus Se) will form a covalent network structure
- All non-metals (minus nobel gases) will form a discrete covalent structure