Crim

Question 1

Specific Intent Crimes

Answer 1

Must be D’s specific intent to commit that crime

Solicitation (intent to have the person solicited commit the crime)
Attempt (intent to complete the crime)
Conspiracy (intent to have the crime completed)
First degree murder (premeditated intent to kill)
Assault (intent to commit a battery)
Larceny and Robbery (intent to permanently deprive another of property)
Burglary (intent to commit felony in dwelling)
Forgery (intent to defraud)
False pretenses (intent to defraud)
Embezzlement (intent to defraud)

Question 2

Malice Crimes

Answer 2

Reckless disregard of an obvious or high risk that the harmful result will occur.
Defenses to specific intent crimes (ex. voluntary intoxication) don’t apply to malice crimes

Arson
Common Law Murder

Question 3

General Intent

Answer 3

D generally intends to commit act prohibits by law (D’s intent doesn’t matter)

Battery
Rape 
Manslaughter
Kidnapping
False Imprisonment

Question 4

Strict Liability

Answer 4

D must voluntarily commit the act…D’s intent is irrelevant
State of mind defenses (ex. mistake of fact) don’t apply

Statutory Rape
Selling Liquor to Minors
Bigamy (some jurisdictions)

Question 5

MPC Mens Rea

Answer 5

Eliminates common law distinctions between general and specific intent and replaces them with

Purposely
Knowingly or willfully
Recklessly
Negligently

Question 6

Common Law Murder

Answer 6

Killing with malice aforethought – exists when NO facts to reduce the killing to voluntary manslaughter or excuse it AND when committed with one of the following states of mind:

Intent to kill

Intent to inflict great bodily injury

Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (depraved heart murder)

Intent to commit a felony (felony murder)

Question 7

Voluntary Manslaughter (Heat of Passion)

Answer 7

Would be murder if there hadn’t been an adequate provocation

Adequate provocation must be the kind that would cause a sudden and intense passion in an ordinary person that would cause them to lose control

If there’s cooling time, it’s not heat of passion. Think: if D had time to walk around the block and cool down, it’s not heat of passion

Question 8

Involuntary Manslaughter

Answer 8

An unintentional killing committed

1. With criminal negligence
   –Grossly negligent action or inaction when there’s a duty to act that puts someone at significant risk of bodily harm or death. Remember this is more intense than regular negligence
2. During an unlawful act
   a. Misdemeanor Manslaughter (killing while committing a misdemeanor)
   b. Killing while committing a felony but doesn’t qualify as 1st degree felony murder or second degree murder

Question 9

First Degree and Second Murder

Answer 9

Generally a murder is 2nd. degree unless:

1. Deliberate and premeditated killing in a cool and dispassionate manner where D reflected on the idea of killing, even if only for a few seconds
2. Felony Murder (typically BARRK felonies – burglary, arson, rape, robbery, kidnapping but can also include other felonies that are inherently dangerous to human life)
3. Heinous Murder.
   –Refers to the way the murder is committed. Think: gruesome violent murders like where torture, mutilation are used

Question 10

Felony Murder Limitations

Answer 10

A death caused in the commission of, or in an attempt to commit, a felony is murder. BUT there are limitations:

1. D must have committed or attempted to commit the underlying felony. Defenses that negate an element of the underlying felony will also serve as a defense to felony murder
2. The felony has to be distinct from the killing itself (ex. if a battery causes someone to die, it doesn’t qualify because the battery isn’t distinct from the killing)
3. The death must be a foreseeable result of the felony
4. The death has to be cause before D’s “immediate flight” from the felony.
   –I.e. Once the felon has reached a place of “temporary safety,” subsequent deaths are not felony murder

Question 11

Homicide Causation

Answer 11

D’s conduct must be both the cause in fact and the proximate case.

Cause in fact: but for D’s conduct, V wouldn’t have died

Proximate cause: V’s death must be natural and probable consequence of D’s conduct.
–Superseding events break the chain of proximate causation (i.e. intervening acts that are NOT foreseeable typically protect D. However, third party’s negligent medical care or victim’s refusal of medical treatment for religious reasons are foreseeable so D remains liable)

Traditionally, the death must occur within 1 year and 1 day from the infliction of the injury or wound

Question 12

Battery

Answer 12

Harmful or offensive touching to victim’s person that results in bodily harm or offensive conduct.

General intent crime (not necessary to intend to cause the injury…only have to intend to do the unlawful act)

Question 13

Assault

Answer 13

1. An attempt to commit a battery, OR
2. Intentionally placing someone in apprehension of imminent bodily harm

Remember:
–Apprehension is awareness. Doesn’t mean fear.
–Once there’s physical contact with victim, the crime can no longer be assault…it would have to be battery

Question 14

False Imprisonment

Answer 14

Unlawful confinement without valid consent

MPC requires confinement “interfere substantially” with V’s liberty
–Basically, if there are other routes available or you can reasonably leave, it’s not confinement

General intent crime.

Question 15

Kidnapping

Answer 15

Unlawful confinement that involves either moving the V or hiding the V

General intent crime.

Question 16

Larceny

Answer 16

Taking and carrying away the personal property of another without consent and with the intent to permanently deprive

Intent to permanently deprive must be present at the time of the taking.

Question 17

Embezzlement

Answer 17

Fraudulent conversion of the personal property of another by someone in lawful possession of that property

Remember:
–D must intend to defraud. If D intends to return that exact property taken, it’s not embezzlement

Question 18

False Pretenses vs. Larceny by Trick

Answer 18

False Pretenses: Obtaining TITLE to the personal property of another by an intentional false representation of a material fact with the intent to defraud

Larceny by Trick: Same as false pretenses EXCEPT instead of obtaining title, this is obtaining POSSESSION or CUSTODY

Question 19

Robbery

Answer 19

Taking and carrying away the personal property of another from their person or presence by force or threat of force and with the intent to permanently deprive

Question 20

Burglary

Answer 20

Breaking and entering the dwelling of another at nighttime with the intent to commit a felony therein

Remember:
–Even if you only use a little force to open, that’s “breaking.” Think: opening an unlocked window…that’s breaking
–The intent must exist at the time of entry

Question 21

Arson

Answer 21

Malicious burning of another’s dwelling

Remember:
–Malicious: intentional OR reckless disregard of an obvious risk
–Burning: the fire MUST cause damage. If there’s no damage, it’s not sufficient.

Question 22

Attempt

Answer 22

Requires: specific intent to do the crime AND an overt act beyond mere preparation
–Most states also require a substantial step

Merger: Attempt merges with the underlying crime so a person can’t be convicted for both attempt and the underlying crime

Withdrawal:
Common Law: abandonment or withdrawal is NOT a defense. If D had intent and commit an overt act, D is guilty even if D changes their mind and abandons before the crime was completed
MPC (minority rule): A fully voluntary and complete abandonment is a valid defense. Abandonment is not voluntary if motivated by desire not to get caught.

Question 23

Solicitation

Answer 23

Requesting another to commit a crime and intending the solicited person commit that crime
–Crime is completed upon request. Other person doesn’t have to agree to be found guilty of solicitation

Merger: In most jx, merges with substantive offense

Withdrawal:
Common Law: In most jx, not a defense that solicitor renounces or withdraws the solicitation.
MPC (minority): Renunciation is a defense IF D prevents commission of the crime

Question 24

Conspiracy

Answer 24

Common Law: An agreement between 2 or more people to accomplish a criminal objective with the intent to enter into the agreement and with the intent to commit the criminal objective

MPC: Also requires an overt act committed in furtherance of the criminal objective (the overt act doesn’t have to be criminal)

Termination: Terminates upon completion of the criminal objective. Any acts or statements after termination are inadmissible against a coconspirator (basically you can’t rat out your co criminals to the police)

Pinkerton Liability: You can be held liable for crimes committed by co-conspirators if they were committed in furtherance of the criminal objective and foreseeable

Withdrawal: Might be a defense to crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy but you can’t withdraw from the conspiracy UNLESS you:

1. Perform an affirmative act notifying all co-conspirators of your withdrawal
2. Give notice in time for them to also abandon plans, AND
3. Attempt to neutralize your help

Merger: Doesn’t merge with completed crime so you can be connected of conspiracy and whatever crimes you committed in furtherance of the conspiracy

Question 25

Insanity

Answer 25

DIMM Durham Irresistible Impulse Test M'Naughten MPC Durham: If D wouldn't have committed the crime BUT for their mental illness Irresistible Impulse Test: Because of their mental illness, D lacked the capacity for self-control or free choice OR to conform conduct in accordance with the law M'Naughten: Because of a mental illness, D did not know the nature and quality of the unlawful act OR the wrongfulness of that act MPC: Because of mental illness, D lacked substantial capacity to appreciate wrongfulness of the unlawful act OR to conform conduct in accordance with the law (basically Irresistible Impulse + M'Naughten)

Question 26

Intoxication

Answer 26

Voluntary Intoxication: Defense to specific intent crimes if the intoxication prevents formation of required intent but does NOT apply to general intent, malice or strict liability crimes Involuntary intoxication: Defense to ALL crimes if the intoxication negates an element of the crime

Question 27

Self-Defense

Answer 27

Nondeadly Force: Person without fault can use non deadly force in self-defense when confronted with unlawful force AND with reasonable belief it's necessary to protect from imminent use of unlawful force upon themself Deadly force: Person without fault can use deadly force when confront with unlawful force AND reasonably believes there's a threat of imminent death or great bodily harm Duty to Retreat: MINORITY of jx require person to retreat before using deadly force UNLESS 1. Attack occurs in V's home 2. Attack occurs while V is making a lawful arrest, or 3. Assailant is in process of robbing victim Imperfect Self-Defense: Can reduce a murder charge to voluntary manslaughter if D kills based on honest but unreasonable belief that use of deadly force was necessary to prevent death or serious bodily harm Defense of Others: D may defend others with force with reasonable belief that that person would have legal right to use force in their own defense. Some courts also will apply imperfect self-defense to defense of others.

Question 28

Duress

Answer 28

D reasonably believed another person would imminently inflict death or great bodily harm upon them or a family member if they didn't commit the crime MPC: threats to property may allow duress defense IF the value of the property outweighs the harm done to society by commission of the crime

Question 29

Mistake of Fact

Answer 29

Defense that indicates that D lacked the state of mind for the crime. Applied to: –Specific intent crimes: mistake doesn't have to be reasonable Malice and general intent crimes: mistake must have been reasonable Strict liability: mistake of fact is irrelevant

Question 30

Accomplice Liability

Answer 30

An accomplice – one who intentionally aided or encouraged someone with the intent that the crime be committed – can be convicted of the encouraged/aided crime AND any foreseeable crimes that occur as a consequence of the initial crime