Crim Flashcards
(59 cards)
Jurisdiction
State acquires jurisdiction when:
(1) Conduct or
(2) Result
happened in that state
Merger
Only 2 merge into substantive offenses:
(1) Solicitation
(2) Attempt
Actus Reus
Any bodily movement but MUST BE VOLUNTARY
Omissions as an act
Legal duty to act:
(1) By statute
(2) By contract
(3) Because relationship between the parties
(4) Because you voluntarily assume duty of care and then fail to adequately perform
(5) When your conduct creates the peril
Mens rea - Common Law
(1) Specific Intent
(2) General Intent
(3) Strict Liability
(4) Malice
Specific Intent Crimes - Scale Barfff
(1) Solicitation
(2) Conspiracy
(3) Attempt
(4) Larceny
(5) Embezzlement
(6) Burglary
(7) Assault
(8) Robbery
(9) Forgery
(10) False Pretenses
(11) First-Degree Murder
Malice Crimes
Only need reckless indifference to show malice.
(1) Arson
(2) Murder
General Intent Crimes
All crimes that do not fit in other categories
Strict Liability Crimes
No intent crimes
Transferred Intent
Intends the harm that is actually caused, but to a different individual
MPC Mental States
(1) Purposely - conscious objective for conduct or result
(2) Knowingly - aware that conduct will likely cause result
(3) Recklessly - consciously disregards conduct will likely cause result
(4) Negligently - fails to be aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk
Accomplice Liability
Aids, advises, or encourages principal in commission of crime with requisite intent that crime be committed.
Liable for crime committed and all other foreseeable crimes
Accomplice Withdrawal
(1) If encourager, must repudiate encouragement
(2) If aided with assistance, must do everything to neutralize assistance
(3) Alternate is to contact the police
Inchoate (Incomplete) Offenses
(1) Solicitation
(2) Conspiracy
(3) Attempt
Solicitation
Rule: Asking someone to commit a crime.
Common law does not require person solicited to agree to commit crime.
Factual Impossibility is no defense.
Conspiracy
Rule: Agreement with intent to agree and pursue unlawful objective
Majority requires overt act, even mere preparation, in furtherance of conspiracy to ground liability
Minority/Common law only requires agreement itself
Common Law: Agreement need not be expressed. Intent may be inferred from conduct. Bilateral Approach.
Unilateral Approach = Modern Trend. Requires only one person have criminal intent
WITHDRAWAL CAN NEVER RELIEVE OF CONSPIRACY, ONLY SUBSEQUENT CRIMES ON CONSPIRATORS
Attempt
Rule: (1) Specific intent (2) plus overt act in furtherance of the crime
Overt Act = Substantial step; Mere preparation is NOT sufficient
Attempt - Defense of Abandonment
Majority: Once substantial step taken, abandonment is never a defense
Minority/MPC: Defense only if (1) fully voluntary and (2) complete renunciation of criminal purpose
Attempt - Impossibility
Legal: May be used
Factual: May not be used
Insanity Defenses - MIDM
(1) M’Naghten - Defendant lacked ability to know wrongfulness of actions or nature and quality of actions
(2) Irresistible Impulse - Lacked capacity for self control and free choice
(3) Durham Rule - Conduct product of mental illness
(4) MPC Approach - Lacked ability to conform conduct to requirement of law
Intoxication
(1) Voluntary - Only defense to specific intent crimes
(2) Involuntary - Occurs (1) unknowingly or (2) under duress. Defense to all crimes.
Infancy
(1) Under 7 - no criminal liability
(2) Under 14 - rebuttable presumption of liability
Self-Defense - Non deadly force
May use anytime victim REASONABLY BELIEVES force is about to be used on him
Self-Defense - Deadly force
Majority: May use anytime victim REASONABLY BELIEVES deadly force is about to be used on him
Minority: Required to retreat if safe to do so except:
(1) in your home
(2) victim of rape or robbery
(3) Police officer