Crime And Deviance Flashcards
(61 cards)
What is functionalists view of crime?
That it is inevitable and universal - Durkheim believes it’s a part of normal society
Durkheim positive functions of crime?
1) Boundary maintenance- crime produces a reaction from society - punishments issued to reinforce social solidarity
2) Adaptation and change - all change starts with a deviant act - if these challenges couldn’t happen society would be unable to make necessary adaptations
Other functions of crime
Davis - prostitution acts as safety valve for release for men’s sexual frustration without threatening monogamous nuclear family
Criticisms of Durkheim
- says there is a required amount of deviance for society but doesn’t say how much that is
- looks at the functions crime serves but not it’s affects in people in society
Functionalism: Mertons strain theory
People engage in deviant behaviour to achieve success and goals by illegitimate means if can’t do it legally
Functionalism: what is deviance the result of?
Merton states it’s a result of:
- Goals that culture encourages individuals to achieve
- what the institutional structure of society allows them to achieve legitimately
What is the American Dream?
Society is meritocratic - opportunities for all who make an effort - reality is different many disadvantaged groups are denied opportunities leading to strain Merton calls “strain to anomie”
Deviant adaptations to strain
Positions in social structure affects the way they adapt or respond to the strain, 5 diff types of adaptation:
- Conformity
- Innovation
- Ritualism
- Retreatism
- Rebellion
Evaluation of Merton
Criticised for:
- Taking official statistics at face value - over-represent working class crime
- Mar it’s argue it ignored ruling class power to enforce laws
A.K Cohen: status frustration
Deviance mainly lower class - focuses on working class boys and argues they gave anomie in middle class school systems making them bottom of the official status hierarchy - this is known as status frustration resulting in joining delinquent subcultures
Alternative status hierarchy
Cohen - delinquent subcultures invert mainstream values this offers an “alternative status hierarchy” where they can create their own opportunities to achieve and win status from their peers through delinquent actions
Cloward and Ohlin: 3 subcultures
- Criminal subcultures - give youths an apprenticeship in criminality
- Conflict subcultures - gangs are formed active through violence
- Retreatist subcultures - those who failed legitimately and illegitimately “double failures”
Evaluation of Cloward and Ohlin
- Ignore the wider power structure - who enforces laws
- Miller - deviance is widespread in lower class but argues it arises out of attempts to achieve own goals not mainstream ones
Institutional anomie theory
Messner and Rosenfield - focuses on American dream - its obsession with money success puts pressure on crime as encourages people to do anything to pursue wealth
Interactionism and labelling
Don’t seek causes of criminal behaviour they ask his and why some people’s actions come to be labelled as criminal
Social construction of crime
Becker - deviant is simply someone to whom the label has been successfully applied and deviant behaviour is simply behaviour that has been labelled as such
What are “moral entrepreneurs”?
People who lead a moral crusade to change the law results in 2 effects:
- New group of outsiders (outlaws)
- Expansion of social control agency (police etc)
Juvenile delinquency - Platt
Argues the idea was created as result of upper class campaigns from Victorian moral entrepreneurs aimed at Epcot etching young people at risk - juveniles established as separate category of offender
Who gets labelled?
Not everyone who commits a crime gets punished for it this depends on factors such as:
- Interactions with agencies of social control
- Appearance background etc
- Situation and circumstances of offence
Cicourel - negotiation of justice
Found that officer’s typifications (stereotypes) cause them to concentrate on certain types of people - showed class bias as working class fit the officers types - justice not fixed but negotiable
Topic versus resource
Cicourel argues statistics don’t give a valid picture of the patterns of crime and cannot be used as a resource
Social construction of crime statistics
Internationalist see statistics of crime as constructed, the outcomes depend on the label attached - as a result statistics only tell us about the activities of police and prosecutors rather than about crime
“Dark figure of crime”
Difference between statistics and “real” rate of crime - unsure how much goes unreported
Primary and secondary deviance
Lemert- primary deviance is deviant acts not publicly labelled unlikely to have a single cause, whereas secondary deviance is a result of societal reaction of labelling also known as a “master status”